An observational study in ECMO Cannula Infection and Extracorporel Membrane Oxygenation Complication, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used as rescue support in patients with refractory respiratory and/or circulatory failure. ECMO cannula site infection (ECMO-CSI) complicates approximately 10% of ECMO runs and is associated with septic shock, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay and increased mortality. To date, there is neither a standardized definition nor consensus diagnostic criteria for ECMO-CSI, and the optimal microbiological sampling strategy, as well as the diagnostic accuracy of the available methods, remains undetermined.
This single-center, prospective, non-interventional study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of three microbiological sampling methods (superficial swab of the cannula insertion site, needle aspiration along the cannula tract, and cannula tip culture) for the diagnosis of ECMO-CSI in adult patients receiving veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO.
A superficial swab and a needle aspirate will be obtained at each cannulation site on the day ECMO-CSI is clinically suspected and on the day of decannulation. In addition, the tip of each cannula will be cultured at decannulation. The results of these index tests will be compared with a reference diagnosis of ECMO-CSI established by an adjudication committee of expert clinicians blinded to the index test results.
A total of 500 patients will be enrolled in order to obtain at least 50 patients with adjudicated ECMO-CSI.
BACKGROUND ECMO is a life-support technique widely used in refractory respiratory and/or circulatory failure. It is associated with infectious complications, notably cannula infections, whose incidence is estimated at about 10%. These infections are associated with an increased risk of septic shock and contribute to longer ICU stay and higher mortality. There is to date neither a standardized definition nor consensus diagnostic criteria, particularly regarding the nature and diagnostic performance of the microbiological samples to be collected. Superficial swabbing of the insertion site is simple and minimally invasive but frequently yields contaminated results or results reflecting colonizing flora. More invasive methods (needle aspiration, culture of the cannula tip at decannulation) may be more specific but are less commonly performed and have not been comparatively validated. A recent international Delphi consensus identified cannula aspiration and cannula swab as the two preferred microbiological methods. The lack of an established diagnostic algorithm leads to heterogeneous management, with potential consequences for antibiotic stewardship and patient outcomes.
DESIGN Single-center, prospective, non-interventional study conducted in the medical ICU of Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (AP-HP, Paris, France), which manages about 300 ECMO patients per year. All adult patients on veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO are eligible. The patient (or trusted person, relative or legal representative) is informed and the patient is included unless an objection is expressed. Inclusion period: 24 months. Participation: duration of ICU stay (maximum 2 months). Total study duration: 26 months.
SAMPLING
On the day the clinician in charge suspects a cannulation site infection, a swab and a needle aspiration are performed at each cannulation site. On the day of decannulation, a swab and a needle aspiration are performed at each cannulation site and the tip of each cannula is sent for culture.
MICROBIOLOGY Samples are cultured in the microbiology laboratory using the Brun-Buisson technique: suspension in 1 mL of sterile saline and vortexing for about 1 minute, then 100 microliters are plated on fresh blood agar, chocolate agar and Sabouraud agar, incubated for 48 hours to 10 days under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and read daily. In case of positive culture, identification is performed by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). Each sample is recorded as culture positive or culture negative.
REFERENCE STANDARD The reference diagnosis of ECMO cannula infection is the clinical diagnosis established by an adjudication committee of three clinician experts, ruling retrospectively and blinded to the results of the index tests, on the basis of the available clinical, biological, microbiological and outcome data.
DATA Data are collected prospectively from the electronic medical record into a REDCap electronic case report form hosted by AP-HP. At each sampling: local appearance of the insertion site (photograph), general and hemodynamic status, biological inflammatory markers, nosocomial infection during the stay, antibiotic therapy within the previous 7 days, rectal colonization with a multidrug-resistant organism, positive blood culture within the previous 48 to 72 hours, duration of ECMO support.
STATISTICS The sample size was set to obtain at least 50 cases of cannula infection; with an expected incidence of 10%, 500 patients will be included. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of each sampling strategy are computed against the reference diagnosis. Paired comparisons use the McNemar test. Agreement between methods is assessed with the kappa coefficient. Exploratory logistic regression analyses will identify factors associated with microbiological positivity. Analyses are performed on complete cases; a failed sampling technique is considered negative.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,578 studies on the registry; 1,030 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adult patients managed in the medical intensive care unit of Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France) on veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO during the inclusion period.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Adult patients on veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO in the ICU. Swab and needle aspiration of each cannulation site on the day of clinical suspicion of cannula infection and on the day of decannulation; culture of each cannula tip at decannulation.
Diagnostic performance of each sampling strategy (superficial swab, needle aspiration, cannula tip culture) for the diagnosis of ECMO cannula infection
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of each sampling strategy, and its agreement with the reference diagnosis of cannula infection established by the adjudication committee.
Time frame: On the day of clinical suspicion of cannula infection and on the day of decannulation, up to ICU discharge (maximum 2 months)
Factors associated with positivity of the microbiological samples
Variables assessed at each sampling: local appearance of the cannula insertion site on a photograph (purulence, inflammatory signs), general and hemodynamic status (fever, blood pressure, heart rate, vasopressors), biological criteria (inflammatory syndrome), nosocomial infection during the stay, antibiotic therapy within 7 days before sampling, rectal colonization with a multidrug-resistant organism, positive blood culture within 48 to 72 hours before sampling, positive culture of the ECMO cannula tip, duration of ECMO support.
Time frame: On the day of clinical suspicion of cannula infection and on the day of decannulation, up to ICU discharge (maximum 2 months)
Agreement between the sampling methods
Agreement on culture positivity and on microbiological identification between swab, needle aspiration and cannula tip culture (kappa coefficient).
Time frame: On the day of clinical suspicion of cannula infection and on the day of decannulation, up to ICU discharge (maximum 2 months)
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris →