ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07891832SACOVLM-PEDIUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Video Laryngeal Mask SaCoVLM Versus LMA Supreme and Ambu AuraGain in Children

An interventional study of SaCoVLM video laryngeal mask and LMA Supreme in Airway Management, Anesthesia, General and Pediatric Anesthesia, sponsored by Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 1 Month to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
135
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Month to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomised controlled trial compares three supraglottic airway devices (laryngeal masks) in children with a body weight of 3-30 kg undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: the SaCoVLM video laryngeal mask (UE Medical), which has an integrated camera allowing visual confirmation and adjustment of mask position, the LMA Supreme (Teleflex) and the Ambu AuraGain (Ambu). Children are randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three devices. The main question is whether the SaCoVLM provides a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (a measure of how well the mask seals the airway) than the LMA Supreme and the Ambu AuraGain. Secondary questions include first-attempt insertion success, the need for repositioning or reinsertion of the mask during surgery and airway-related complications.

Read the detailed description

Blind insertion of supraglottic airway devices is associated with a first-attempt success rate of about 85% and frequent suboptimal positioning, which may require repositioning or reinsertion and can lead to desaturation, laryngospasm or bronchospasm. The SaCoVLM combines a second-generation laryngeal mask with a video camera that visualises the laryngeal inlet and allows the position to be corrected without reinsertion.

Design: prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled superiority trial with three arms (SaCoVLM, LMA Supreme, Ambu AuraGain), conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice.

Procedures: After confirmation of eligibility, written informed consent of the parent or legal guardian and pre-anaesthetic assessment, participants are randomised 1:1:1 using a computer-generated sequence with variable block sizes (Study Randomizer). Anaesthesia is induced with propofol and sufentanil at the discretion of the attending anaesthesiologist; neuromuscular blocking agents are not administered before device insertion and OLP measurement. Device size follows manufacturer weight-based recommendations; the dorsal surface is lubricated with water-based gel. In the SaCoVLM group, the integrated video display is used to visualise the laryngeal inlet and to verify and, if necessary, adjust the device position. A maximum of three insertion attempts is permitted; failure leads to conversion to tracheal intubation or a different supraglottic airway device. Cuff pressure is set to 40-60 cmH2O using a manual manometer. OLP is measured within 5 minutes after insertion once stable ventilation is achieved (manual mode, ventilation paused, fresh gas flow 10 L/min, APL valve set to 50 cmH2O; the airway pressure at which the manometer reading becomes stable is recorded). In the SaCoVLM group, video image quality (5-point Likert scale) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) are recorded immediately after OLP measurement. Device function, need for repositioning or reinsertion and complications are recorded during surgery; blood staining is assessed after removal at the end of emergence.

Blinding: the anaesthesiologists inserting the device are not blinded; statistical analysis is performed by investigators blinded to group allocation.

Statistics: The primary hypothesis is tested by two pre-specified pairwise comparisons (SaCoVLM vs LMA Supreme and SaCoVLM vs Ambu AuraGain) using independent-samples t-tests (or Mann-Whitney U test), with Bonferroni-adjusted two-sided alpha of 0.025 per comparison. LMA Supreme vs Ambu AuraGain is reported descriptively. Secondary endpoints are exploratory (chi-square/Fisher exact test, t-test/Mann-Whitney U test). The primary analysis follows the intention-to-treat principle; a per-protocol analysis is a sensitivity analysis.

Sample size: assuming mean OLP of 25 cmH2O (SD 5) for LMA Supreme and 29 cmH2O (SD 5) for SaCoVLM (minimal clinically important difference 4 cmH2O, Cohen's d 0.8), alpha 0.025 and 90% power, 41 evaluable patients per group are required; allowing 10% non-evaluable data, 45 patients per group (135 in total) will be enrolled.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Management
  • Anesthesia, General
  • Pediatric Anesthesia

Keywords

  • supraglottic airway device
  • video laryngeal mask
  • SaCoVLM
  • LMA Supreme
  • Ambu AuraGain
  • oropharyngeal leak pressure
  • children
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s. is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Paediatric patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with a supraglottic airway device
  • Body weight 3-30 kg (supraglottic airway device sizes 1-2.5)
  • Written of the parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body weight \< 3 kg or > 30 kg
  • Anticipated difficult airway
  • History of difficult airway
  • Indication for airway management by a method other than a supraglottic airway device
  • Emergency surgery
  • Absence of written of the parent or legal guardian
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
135 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SaCoVLM

    Children randomised to airway management with the SaCoVLM video laryngeal mask, with video-guided verification and adjustment of device position.

    Device: SaCoVLM video laryngeal mask

  • Active comparator
    LMA Supreme

    Children randomised to airway management with the LMA Supreme, inserted using the standard blind technique.

    Device: LMA Supreme

  • Active comparator
    Ambu AuraGain

    Children randomised to airway management with the Ambu AuraGain, inserted using the standard blind technique.

    Device: Ambu AuraGain

Interventions

  • DeviceSaCoVLM video laryngeal mask

    Airway management with the SaCoVLM video laryngeal mask (UE Medical, China), a second-generation supraglottic airway device with an integrated camera. The video display is used to visualise the laryngeal inlet and to verify and, if necessary, adjust the device position. Size per manufacturer weight-based recommendation; cuff pressure 40-60 cmH2O.

  • DeviceLMA Supreme

    Airway management with the LMA Supreme (Teleflex, USA), a second-generation supraglottic airway device inserted using the standard blind technique. Size per manufacturer weight-based recommendation; cuff pressure 40-60 cmH2O.

  • DeviceAmbu AuraGain

    Airway management with the Ambu AuraGain (Ambu A/S, Denmark), a second-generation supraglottic airway device inserted using the standard blind technique. Size per manufacturer weight-based recommendation; cuff pressure 40-60 cmH2O.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)

    Airway pressure (cmH2O) at which the circuit manometer reading becomes stable, measured with the breathing circuit in manual mode, ventilation paused, fresh gas flow 10 L/min and the APL valve set to 50 cmH2O, after stable ventilation is achieved.

    Time frame: From device insertion up to 5 minutes after insertion

Secondary outcomes

  1. First-attempt insertion success rate

    Proportion of patients in whom the device is successfully inserted with adequate ventilation at the first attempt.

    Time frame: From the start of the first insertion attempt until successful insertion (maximum 3 attempts), up to 10 minutes

  2. Need for device repositioning or reinsertion during surgery

    Proportion of patients requiring repositioning, reinsertion of the device or other airway intervention after successful insertion.

    Time frame: From device insertion until device removal at the end of anaesthesia, up to 5 hours

  3. Incidence of perioperative airway-related complications

    Proportion of patients with at least one of: desaturation (SpO2 \< 92%), laryngospasm, bronchospasm, aspiration; each complication also reported separately.

    Time frame: From device insertion until device removal at the end of anaesthesia, up to 5 hours

  4. Blood staining of the device on removal

    Proportion of patients with visible blood on the device or in secretions after device removal.

    Time frame: At device removal at the end of emergence from anaesthesia, up to 5 hours after insertion

  5. Video image quality (SaCoVLM group only)

    Quality of the video image of the integrated display rated by the inserting anaesthesiologist on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = worst, 5 = best; image quality only).

    Time frame: Immediately after OLP measurement, up to 5 minutes after device insertion

  6. Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) (SaCoVLM group only)

    Percentage of the glottic opening visible on the integrated video display (0-100%).

    Time frame: Immediately after OLP measurement, up to 5 minutes after device insertion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem, Krajska zdravotni a.s.
    Ústí nad Labem, 400 11, Czechia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gao X, Liu JH, Chen CM, Wang Y, Wang ZY, Yan CL, Zuo MZ, Cao Y, Qiao X, Huang YQ, Liu PC, Zhang H, Zhang JQ, Shen JM, Li C, Wang Y, Sun YY, Song JN, Zhang XZ, Zhang YL, Luo XT, Wu LN, Zhang Y, Shi L, Zhang Y, Xue FS, Tian M. Comparison of the supraglottic airway device BlockBusterTM and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in anaesthetised, paralyzed adult patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022 Aug;19(8):649-656. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2130048. Epub 2022 Oct 5. PubMed 36200143 ↗
  • Sun Y, Zhang M, Gao X, Gao Z, Zou T, Guo Y, Liu M, Chen L, Zhang X, Liu Y, Feng H, Wang Y. Effect of the new video laryngeal mask airway SaCoVLM on airway management in lateral laparoscopic urological surgery: A single center randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):2132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51856-4. PubMed 38272937 ↗
  • Yan CL, Chen Y, Sun P, Qv ZY, Zuo MZ. Preliminary evaluation of SaCoVLM video laryngeal mask airway in airway management for general anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01541-0. PubMed 34979936 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 7 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07891832
Lead sponsor
Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.
Collaborators
Faculty of Health Studies, J. E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Charles University, Czech Republic
Responsible party
Michal Kalina (MD, PhD, MBA, Deputy for Science and Research, Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Michal Kalina, MD, PhD, MBA
Contact
michal.kalina@kzcr.eu
+420477111111
Michal Kalina, MD, PhD, MBA
principal investigator · Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem, Krajska zdravotni a.s.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion