An interventional study of Video-Laryngoscope Platform in Video Laryngoscopy, Quality Improvement and Operating Rooms, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.
Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The goal of this quality improvement protocol is to compare the evaluations between video laryngoscopes (VLs) available in the University of Colorado Health Hospital at Metro Denver operating rooms (ORs).
With the feedback from survey answers collected, they will be translated into quantifiable data to easily review the VL usability and efficiency per VL device.
An evidence-based, comparative evaluation of commonly available VL systems in the UCHealth operating rooms (ORs). Building on our institution's prior QI approach for airway equipment selection (structured provider surveys, nonparametric analyses, and multi-year cost modeling), this project will
University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,538 studies on the registry; 319 are open to participants now.
Of its 146 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (63%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
AMBU Laryngoscope randomization
Device: Video-Laryngoscope Platform
CMAC-Storz Laryngoscope randomization
Device: Video-Laryngoscope Platform
Glidescope Laryngoscope randomization
Device: Video-Laryngoscope Platform
One of three video-laryngoscope platforms will be used for each randomized study participant undergoing an intubation.
Global usability rating
Likert-scale measurement (1-5) of global usability. Question is framed as: "what is your overall rating of this product?"
Time frame: 3 months
Illumination and airway visualization
Likert-scale outcomes (1-5 scale) assessed via survey of study physicians
Time frame: 3 months
Packaging and assembly
Likert-scale outcomes (1-5 scale) assessed via survey of study physicians
Time frame: 3 months
Sturdiness and rigidity
Likert-scale outcomes (1-5 scale) assessed via survey of study physicians
Time frame: 3 months
Comfort and ease-of-use
Likert-scale outcomes (1-5 scale) assessed via survey of study physicians
Time frame: 3 months
Screen resolution
Likert-scale outcomes (1-5 scale) assessed via survey of study physicians
Time frame: 3 months
Overall rating
Likert-scale outcomes (1-5 scale) assessed via survey of study physicians
Time frame: 3 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 3 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Colorado, Denver →