ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07888738EASY DISTALUpdated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluation of Safety, Performance and Usability of the TR Band DISTAL Device for Hemostasis Following Distal Radial Access in Coronary Procedures

An observational study in Hemostasis and Distal Radial Artery Access (dTRA), sponsored by Terumo Europe N.V.. Not yet recruiting at 7 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Terumo Europe N.V. (part of Terumo Corporation) · Observational

Updated Oct 22, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study has been organised to learn more about the safety and use of the TR Band Distal device in patients who have had a heart procedure through a blood vessel in the wrist near the base of the thumb (called distal radial access). The study will look at how well the device helps stop bleeding after the procedure, while still allowing blood to flow normally through the blood vessel in the wrist.

Read the detailed description

Individuals may be invited to participate in this clinical study if they have been offered a procedure to examine the blood vessels of the heart, treat any narrowing or blockage, or both. The procedure involves inserting a thin flexible tube (catheter) through a blood vessel in the wrist near the base of the thumb, which allows the doctor to reach the heart. The procedure will be carried out as part of the individual's planned medical treatment.

The TR Band Distal is a band placed around the hand after the procedure. It contains a small clear cushion that gently presses on the area where the artery was accessed to help stop bleeding. The band is temporary and is removed once bleeding has stopped.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemostasis
  • Distal Radial Artery Access (dTRA)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Terumo Europe N.V. is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients receiving a diagnostic or interventional procedure via the distal radial artery. Up to 10 clinical investigation sites located in Europe will participate. Up to 10 clinical investigation sites located in Europe will participate.

The maximum number of subjects per site is 80.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Successful insertion of Distal Radial Sheath
  • Scheduled to undergo a heart procedure through a blood vessel in the wrist near the base of the thumb (called distal radial access)
  • Suitable blood vessel in the wrist for the procedure;
  • Successful placement of the required equipment.
  • Willingness to participate by signing this informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a certain type of heart attack requiring emergency treatment
  • Dialysis
  • Doctor is unable to perform the procedure through the planned blood vessel in the wrist near the base of your thumb
  • Procedure is started through a different blood vessel and then switched to the blood vessel in the wrist near the base of the thumb.
  • A previous distal radial access procedure has been performed in the same arm, or
  • The participant is in a life-threatening condition in which the heart cannot pump sufficient blood to the body (known as cardiogenic shock)
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceTR Band Distal

    Coronary procedure via distal radial access using the TR Band Distal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Subjects Achieving Successful Hemostasis Within 24 Hours

    Proportion of subjects achieving successful hemostasis within 24 hours following a coronary procedure performed via distal radial access. Successful hemostasis is defined as the absence of proximal radial artery occlusion (blockage of the artery), confirmed by Doppler ultrasound, and the absence of clinically relevant access-site hematoma (modified EASY grade II or higher).

    Time frame: Within 24 hours following the index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to hemostasis

    Time to hemostasis, measured in minutes, between the removal of the procedural sheath up to the removal of the TR Band Distal device without the re occurrence of bleeding.

    Time frame: From sheath removal until removal of the TR Band Distal device, up to 24 hours post-procedure

  2. Proportion of Subjects With Proximal Radial Artery Occlusion

    Proportion of subjects with proximal radial artery occlusion (blocked artery) within 24 hours after the procedure. Doppler ultrasound will be used to assess whether blood continues to flow normally through the artery.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after the procedure

  3. Proportion of subjects achieving clinically relevant access-site hematoma

    Proportion of subjects with clinically relevant access-site hematoma within 24 hours after the procedure, defined as a modified EASY grade II, III, IV, or V hematoma. The wrist access site will be examined before hospital discharge to assess for bruising or swelling around the puncture site.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after the procedure

  4. Proportion of subjects achieving freedom from other access-site and vascular complications within 24 hours post-procedure, including bleeding (BARC score)

    Bleeding events will be classified according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria,a standardized bleeding classification system ranging from Type 0 to Type 5, where: Type 0 = no bleeding, Type 5 = fatal bleeding. Higher BARC scores indicate more severe bleeding and therefore a worse clinical outcome.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure

  5. Proportion of subjects achieving freedom from other access-site and vascular complications within 24 hours post-procedure, including hematoma (EASY score 1 or higher)

    Hematomas (bruising around the wrist access site) will be classified using the modified EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries Study) hematoma scale, which categorizes bruising according to its size and severity, from Type Ia (a small bruise around the wrist puncture site that remains below the wrist bone) to Type V (a hematoma associated with an ischemic threat to the hand). Higher grades indicate a worse clinical outcome.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure

  6. Patient-reported outcomes following distal radial access and hemostasis using the TR Band Distal device, assessed by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Patient-reported pain intensity will be evaluated using a standardized Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The NPRS is an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "No pain" and 10 indicates "Worst pain imaginable." Higher score indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: (i) Periprocedural (during device wear), and (ii) Periprocedural (after removal of the TR Band Distal device but before hospital discharge)

  7. Patient-reported outcomes following distal radial access and hemostasis using the patient satisfaction questionnaire

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a study-specific questionnaire that evaluates comfort while wearing the device and the ability to move the hand and fingers, and the overall satisfaction. Each item is assessed using four ordered response categories ranging from the least favorable to the most favorable response (e.g., poor to excellent, very uncomfortable to very comfortable, or very dissatisfied to very satisfied).. Patient should only select one response for each question. Responses in more favorable categories indicate better outcome.

    Time frame: Periprocedural (during device wear)

  8. Usability of the TR Band Distal device from the operator perspective, evaluated through a questionnaire completed

    Data on device usability and operator satisfaction will be collected using an operator questionnaire completed by the operator who deployed the TR Band Distal device. The questionnaire will capture the operator's assessment of device handling, ease of application, inflation/deflation process, stability during use, and overall satisfaction. The questionnaire consists of 11 multiple-choice questions, each with four response options, and only one response may be selected for each question.

    Time frame: Periprocedural (after removal of the TR Band Distal device but before hospital discharge)

07

Study locations

7 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07888738
Lead sponsor
Terumo Europe N.V.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion