ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07888660fingerbreadthsUpdated Oct 22, 2026

Discrepancy of Airway Assessment for Intubation Among Thai Population Using Fingerbreadths as Substitute for Centimetres

An observational study in Airway Assessment, sponsored by Prince of Songkla University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Prince of Songkla University · Observational

Updated Oct 22, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hand-dimensions of 64 airway assessment personnel were measured by one investigator using a vernier caliper. These personnel assessed the thyromental distance and inter-incisor gap of 15 pseudo-patients in a fully crossed design following normal practice. They then measured these parameters using a vernier caliper. Inter-assessor variability using the same pseudo-patient was then compared between measurements based on raw fingerbreadths, fingerbreadths adjusted for hand size, and vernier caliper.

Read the detailed description

A sample of personnel who may need to undertake airway assessment of patients scheduled for intratracheal intubation was enrolled and their hand measurements taken. Each assessor was requested to make the 4 airway assessments, TMD, ICG, Mallampati grade and upper lip bite test on each of a group of volunteers. The TMD and ICG were measured first using fingerbreadths and then making measurements using a vernier caliper. Agreement between raw and hand size adjusted fingerbreadth measurements and vernier measurements of TMD and ICG were evaluated, and inter-assessor variation using each of the measurement/grading methods assessed

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Assessment

Keywords

  • airway
  • airway assessment
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Prince of Songkla University is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Sixty-four persons are recruited as assessors from among the hospital personnel who would at times need to make airway assessments.

Fifteen volunteers were purposively selected from among male and female faculty staff to act as pseudo-patients on whom airway assessments were to be made.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • understand the instruction of airway assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cannot cooperate
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Week
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • 1

    Sixty-four persons were recruited as assessors from among the hospital personnel who would at times need to make airway assessments. They included 9 attending anaesthesiologists, 20 nurse anaesthetists, 18 anaesthesia residents and 17 nurse anaesthetist students. The instruction on the use of a vernier caliper was oriented to all participants before the study was begun. Basic characteristics of each assessor (age, sex, height, weight, hand-dominance) were determined and recorded.

    Diagnostic Test: the caliper venier will be used to measure the airway.

  • Sixty-four persons were recruited as assessors from among the hospital personnel who would at times

    Fifteen volunteers were purposively selected from among male and female faculty staff to act as pseudo-patients on whom airway assessments were to be made.

    Diagnostic Test: the caliper venier will be used to measure the airway.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testthe caliper venier will be used to measure the airway.

    the vernier calipers were applied with only light pressure so that the soft tissue of the hand was not indented. Each measurement was made three times and the mean dimension calculated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Discrepancy of airway assessment for intubation

    Inter-assessor variability

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of measurement at 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Prince of Songkla University, Faculty of Medicine
    Songkhla, Changwat Songkhla 90110, Thailand
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — I would share after I finish the analysis.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07888660
Responsible party
Sumidtra Prathep, MD (Attending Staff and Lecturer, Prince of Songkla University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 10, 2025
Completion
Dec 27, 2025
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion