ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07888153CCePPUpdated Oct 22, 2026

Study of Cross-Cutting E-Health Prevention Approaches

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions in Alcohol Misuse Prevention and Sexual Violence Prevention, sponsored by University of New Hampshire. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by University of New Hampshire · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Oct 22, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
350
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The National Institute of Health Academic Research Enhancement Award research study fills a major gap in sexual violence and alcohol misuse prevention on college campuses by implementing and testing the feasibility of a multi-level social ecological model approach consisting of six established e-health primary prevention strategies in a feasibility study.

Read the detailed description

The National Institute of Health Academic Research Enhancement Award Pilot Study fills a major gap in sexual violence and alcohol misuse prevention on college campuses by implementing and testing the feasibility of a multi-level approach consisting of six established e-health primary prevention strategies of a Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program, with six evidence-based and proven alcohol misuse and sexual violence prevention strategies as a full package of synergistic cross-cutting interventions that target multiple levels of the social ecological model (individual, relationship, and community).

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Misuse Prevention
  • Sexual Violence Prevention

Keywords

  • sexual violence
  • sexual assault
  • alcohol misuse
  • E-Health
  • bystander
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of New Hampshire is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • full-time University of New Hampshire student
  • first-year University of New Hampshire student
  • live in the University of New Hampshire residence halls
  • not married

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not a University of New Hampshire first-year student
  • does not live in the University of New Hampshire residence halls
  • married
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
350 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Programming Intervention

    Participants in the intervention arm will participate in the RealConsent serial webinar program, the +Change Social Norms Program, and the ShipHappens Bystander Video Game.

    Behavioral: Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions

  • No intervention
    Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Control Arm

    True control group.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions

    Three sexual violence and alcohol misuse ehealth prevention programs for college students.

    Also known as: RealConsent, +Change, ShipHappens

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization

    Sexual assault victimization was assessed with Revised Sexual Experience Survey. Participants were asked how often they experienced 7 unwanted sexual experiences. Also, the tactic that was used (for example, "using force") was also noted. Response options ranged from 0 (never) to 3 (3 or more times). An overall score for the Revised Sexual Experience Survey, was calculated by Summing each Outcome and Tactic Score with a range from 0 to 135 with higher scores indicating more sexual violence victimization, a worse score than the lower scores. The second method combines several of the outcomes, but keeps tactics separate, resulting in a potential range of 0 to 63 with the higher score being a worse score than the lower score.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Perpetration

    The Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Perpetration is a 7-item, behaviorally specific self-report instrument designed to assess the perpetration of unwanted sexual behaviors. It covers sexual coercion, unwanted contact, attempted rape, and rape, typically asking about acts committed since age 14 or in the past year. The higher score indicates more unwanted sexual experiences and therefore is a worse score than a lower score.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  3. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise

    The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test is a 10-item screening tool developed by the World Health Organization to assess alcohol consumption, drinking behaviors, and alcohol-related problems. The higher the score indicates more alcohol related problems, therefore a worse score.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  4. Drinking Behavior Questionnaire

    A ten-item self report measure looking at an individual's drinking habits. The higher the score indicates more problematic drinking habits, therefore a worse score.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bystander Attitudes Scale Revised

    12-item measure of attitudes towards bystander behaviors. Higher scores are better scores indicating that the participant is more willing to engage in prosocial bystander intervention before, during, or after sexual assault or violence situations.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. Barriers to Sexual Assault Bystander Intervention Scale

    The Barriers to Sexual Assault Bystander Intervention Scale is a 16-item, 7-point Likert-scale questionnaire that measures five key psychological barriers hindering bystander intervention in sexual violence. It assesses failure to notice, interpret risk, take responsibility, possess skills, or fear of negative evaluation. Higher scores are worse scores indicating greater perceived barriers to prosocial bystander intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  3. Social Self-identification Scale

    4-item measure to assess the relevancy of the intervention to the participant's life. The higher score indicates that intervention was more relevant to the participant's life indicating a better score.

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  4. Bystander Efficacy Scale

    The Bystander Efficacy Scale measures the effectiveness of sexual violence prevention programs based on preventing antecedents to sexual violence by increasing prosocial bystander behavior. On this measure, participants are asked to indicate their confidence, on an 11-point scale, in performing each of the listed 14 bystander behaviors. Higher average scores are better scores indicating a person's greater bystander self-efficacy (higher confidence in one's ability to intervene).

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  5. Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale,

    The Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale, is a 22-item instrument designed to measure contemporary, often subtle, rape-supportive beliefs. It updates the original 45-item scale to reflect modern language and attitudes, aiming to reduce social desirability bias, featuring a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Agree, 5 = Strongly Disagree). The higher the score is the worse score indicating that the participants holds negative rape myth scores.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  6. Intent to Help Friends-Stranger Scale

    Intent to Help Friends-Stranger Scale is a psychometric instrument designed to measure a bystander's intention to intervene in situations involving interpersonal violence (sexual assault, dating violence) depending on their relationship to the victim. The higher the score is the better score indicating participants are more willing to help a friend or stranger in a probably dangerous situation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  7. Alcohol Expectancies Regarding Sex, Aggression, and Sexual Vulnerability Questionnaire

    The Alcohol Expectancies Regarding Sex, Aggression, and Sexual Vulnerability Questionnaire is used too assess three types of sex-related alcohol expectancies: sexual affect, sexual drive, and vulnerability to sexual coercion. A higher score is worse than a lower score.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Potter SJ, Moynihan MM, Stapleton JG. Using social self-identification in social marketing materials aimed at reducing violence against women on campus. J Interpers Violence. 2011 Mar;26(5):971-90. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365870. Epub 2010 Jun 3. PubMed 20522887 ↗
  • Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Hardin J, Berkowitz A. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 5;16(9):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3426. PubMed 25198417 ↗
  • Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, McGroarty-Koon K. Formative Research With College Men to Inform Content and Messages for a Web-Based Sexual Violence Prevention Program. Health Commun. 2017 Sep;32(9):1133-1141. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1214219. Epub 2016 Sep 3. PubMed 27593559 ↗
  • Schipani-McLaughlin AM, Gilmore AK, Salazar LF, Potter SJ, Stapleton JG, Orchowski LM. Advancing a Comprehensive Multilevel Approach to Sexual Violence Prevention Using Existing Efficacious Programs. J Forensic Nurs. 2024 Jan-Mar 01;20(1):20-29. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000457. Epub 2023 Nov 24. PubMed 38015061 ↗
  • Basile KC, DeGue S, Jones K, et al. STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevension. Published online 2016.
  • Potter S, Howard R, Murphy S, Moynihan MM. Long-term impacts of college sexual assaults on women survivors' educational and career attainments. J Am Coll Health. 2018 Aug-Sep;66(6):496-507. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1440574. Epub 2018 Mar 30. PubMed 29447618 ↗
  • doi:10.1177/1521025115584750
  • doi:10.1037/a0033470
  • Crosby RA, Salazar LF. Essentials of Public Health Research Methods. 1st ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2021. Accessed October 11, 2023. https://www.jblearning.com/catalog
  • Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Cares AC, Potter SJ, Williams LM, Stapleton JG. Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain 1 year later? J Interpers Violence. 2015 Jan;30(1):110-32. doi: 10.1177/0886260514532719. Epub 2014 May 20. PubMed 24850763 ↗
  • Potter SJ, Stapleton JG. Bringing in the target audience in bystander social marketing materials for communities: suggestions for practitioners. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):797-812. doi: 10.1177/1077801211410364. PubMed 21727157 ↗
  • Potter SJ, Flanagan M, Seidman M, Hodges H, Stapleton JG. Developing and Piloting Videogames to Increase College and University Students' Awareness and Efficacy of the Bystander Role in Incidents of Sexual Violence. Games Health J. 2019 Feb;8(1):24-34. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0172. Epub 2018 Sep 5. PubMed 30183345 ↗
  • Gilmore AK, Lewis MA, George WH. A randomized controlled trial targeting alcohol use and sexual assault risk among college women at high risk for victimization. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Nov;74:38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 29. PubMed 26408290 ↗
  • Gilmore AK, Leone RM, Oesterle DW, Davis KC, Orchowski LM, Ramakrishnan V, Kaysen D. Web-Based Alcohol and Sexual Assault Prevention Program With Tailored Content Based on Gender and Sexual Orientation: Preliminary Outcomes and Usability Study of Positive Change (+Change). JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 22;6(7):e23823. doi: 10.2196/23823. PubMed 35867393 ↗
  • Salazar LF, Schipani-McLaughlin AM, Sebeh Y, Nizam Z, Hayat M. A Web-Based Sexual Violence, Alcohol Misuse, and Bystander Intervention Program for College Women (RealConsent): Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 21;25:e43740. doi: 10.2196/43740. PubMed 37342080 ↗
  • Schipani-McLaughlin AM, Salazar LF, Muilenburg JL, Lauckner C, Swartzendruber A, Walters D. A Mixed Media Campaign to Promote Bystander Intervention and Reduce Alcohol Use Among College Students: A Pilot Study. Health Promot Pract. 2022 Nov;23(6):973-983. doi: 10.1177/15248399211027542. Epub 2021 Jul 31. PubMed 34338037 ↗
  • Potter SJ, Moschella EA, Smith D, Draper N. Exploring the Usage of a Violence Prevention and Response App Among Community College Students. Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(1_suppl):44S-53S. doi: 10.1177/1090198120910995. PubMed 32452252 ↗
  • 10.1080/15228835.2021.1929665
  • Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Schipani-McLaughlin AM. Theoretical Mediators of RealConsent: A Web-Based Sexual Violence Prevention and Bystander Education Program. Health Educ Behav. 2019 Feb;46(1):79-88. doi: 10.1177/1090198118779126. Epub 2018 Jul 11. PubMed 29996689 ↗
  • Potter SJ. Using a multimedia social marketing campaign to increase active bystanders on the college campus. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(4):282-95. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.599350. PubMed 22559087 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The research team will retain and share aggregated quantitative and qualitative data (after all identifying information is redacted), if users commit to the following: (1) using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) securing the data using appropriate computer technology (for example, using a secure firewall-protected server to store datasets and transcriptions); and (3) destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. If the researcher agrees to these stipulations, the PI will send him/her the data set prepared using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 29 and/or the de-identified transcriptions from focus groups. Research participants will be identified by number. All data, including focus group transcriptions, will not include identifying information from any participant. Any information that could potentially identify a participant will be removed from the data set.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: The scientific data will be made available to other users no later than time of an associated publication or end of the performance period, whichever comes first and for how long data will be available.

Access criteria: Upon completion of the proposed study, we will work with the program officer to access how to share the data and will follow their direction.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 7 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 5, 2026
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
StartActual
Sep 21, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07888153
Lead sponsor
University of New Hampshire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
Start date
Sep 21, 2026
Primary completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Sharyn J Potter, PhD, MPH
Contact
sharyn.potter@unh.edu
16038623630
Jane G Stapleton, MS
Contact
jane.stapleton@unh.edu
6038625444

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion