ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07886866VR-DT-DRHSSUpdated Nov 9, 2026

The Effect of Virtual Reality-Based Disaster Training on Disaster Readiness of Health Science Students

An interventional study of simulations Virtual Reality-Based Disaster Training With Simulation in Disaster Readiness Among Health Science Students, sponsored by Vision College - Riyad. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 28 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Vision College - Riyad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2026, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Nov 4, 2026Primary outcomes revisedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 28 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluated the effect of three-dimensional (simulations) virtual reality-based disaster training with simulation on disaster readiness among health science students. The study used a randomized controlled design. Participants assigned to the intervention group received disaster training using 3D virtual reality technology and simulation, while participants in the control group received usual education or training. Outcomes were assessed at baseline before the intervention, after completion of the training, and at a subsequent follow-up assessment. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of simulations virtual reality-based simulation training on disaster readiness over time.

Read the detailed description

Disaster readiness is an important competency for health science students, who may be required to contribute to healthcare responses during emergencies and disasters. Educational strategies that combine practical learning with simulated scenarios may help students develop the preparedness needed to respond to disaster situations.

Three-dimensional (simulations) virtual reality technology combined with simulation provides an immersive learning environment in which students can engage with simulated disaster scenarios. This approach allows students to experience disaster-related situations in a controlled educational setting.

This randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of simulations virtual reality-based disaster training with simulation on disaster readiness among health science students. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group received simulations virtual reality-based disaster training with simulation, while the control group received usual education or training.

Study outcomes were assessed before the intervention, after the training, and at a subsequent follow-up assessment using the measurement instruments specified in the study protocol. The study examined whether the intervention affected disaster readiness and whether any observed effects were maintained at follow-up after 8 week.

02

Conditions studied

  • Disaster Readiness Among Health Science Students

Keywords

  • Virtual Reality
  • Three-Dimensional Simulation
  • Disaster Preparedness
  • Disaster Readiness
  • Health Science Students
  • Disaster Education
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Vision College - Riyad as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 28 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Students enrolled in the participating health sciences programs at the study institution.

Students who met the study's age and participation requirements.

Students who provided to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who did not meet the inclusion criteria.

Students who declined to participate or did not provide .

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
110 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality-Based Disaster Training

    Participants received disaster training using simulations virtual reality technology and simulation

    Behavioral: simulations Virtual Reality-Based Disaster Training With Simulation

  • No intervention
    Usual Education or Training

    Participants received disaster training without using simulations virtual reality technology and simulation

Interventions

  • Behavioralsimulations Virtual Reality-Based Disaster Training With Simulation

    Participants in the intervention group received disaster training using three-dimensional virtual reality technology and simulation. The training was designed to provide an immersive learning experience involving disaster scenarios to support disaster readiness among health science students. The intervention was delivered according to the study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disaster Preparedness Skills

    Disaster preparedness skills will be assessed using the Disaster Preparedness Skills Form (DPSF). The minimum possible score is 0, and the maximum possible score is 25. Higher scores indicate better disaster preparedness skills.

    Time frame: Baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of training.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disaster Preparedness Skills at 8-Week Follow-Up

    Disaster readiness skills will be assessed using the Disaster Preparedness Skills Form (DPSF), the same measurement instrument used for the baseline and post-training assessments. The minimum possible score is 0, and the maximum possible score is 25. Higher scores indicate better disaster preparedness skills.

    Time frame: 8 weeks after completion of the training.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Vision Colleges
    Riyāḑ, 3422, Saudi Arabia
08

Updates

3 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • ChangedBefore Change in Disaster Readiness Score From Baseline to Post-TrainingNow Disaster Preparedness SkillsTime frame: Baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of training.
Nov 4, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedDisaster Readiness ScorePreparedness Skills at 8-Week Follow-UpTime frame: 8 weeks after completion of the training.
Nov 4, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 3 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Nov 4, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • ChangedBefore Change in Disaster Readiness Score From Baseline to Post-TrainingNow Disaster Preparedness SkillsTime frame: Baseline before the intervention to immediately after completion of training.
    Secondary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedDisaster Readiness ScorePreparedness Skills at 8-Week Follow-UpTime frame: 8 weeks after completion of the training.
  3. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07886866
Lead sponsor
Vision College - Riyad
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026
Completion
Sep 15, 2026
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion