ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07885631Updated Oct 21, 2026

A School-Based Intervention to Prevent Disordered Eating in Middle School Students

An interventional study of School-Based Disordered Eating Prevention Education Program in Disordered Eating Behaviors, sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 12 Years to 13 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 21, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
235
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to develop an educational program for the prevention of disordered eating behaviors among middle school students and to evaluate its effectiveness. The study was conducted with seventh-grade students and their parents at a middle school in Izmir, Türkiye. Classes were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. The three-week educational program focused on body image, social media literacy, and healthy eating attitudes. The effects of the program were evaluated by comparing eating attitudes, body satisfaction, social media literacy, sociocultural appearance attitudes, dietary quality, nutrient intake, and anthropometric measurements between the groups over time.

Read the detailed description

The study was conducted with seventh-grade middle school students aged 12-13 years (n = 235) and their parents (n = 129). Classes were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 138 students) and control (n = 97 students) groups. Before the intervention, the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short Parent Version was administered to parents, and one-day dietary records of their children were collected. The students completed the Numerical Rating Scale, Social Media Literacy Scale, Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4-Revised, and Mediterranean Diet Quality Index, and their anthropometric measurements were taken.

The scales were administered to the intervention group before and after the intervention and at the 12-week follow-up, and to the control group at baseline and at the 12-week follow-up. The intervention group received a three-week educational program delivered once per week. Each weekly session consisted of two consecutive 40-minute class periods (80 minutes per week), for a total of six 40-minute class periods over three weeks. The control group continued their usual school curriculum with their teachers during the same period. In addition, parents of students in the intervention group received one 40-minute educational session.

02

Conditions studied

  • Disordered Eating Behaviors

Keywords

  • disordered eating behaviour
  • body image
  • adolescent
  • social media
  • education
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Izmir Katip Celebi University is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Enrolled in the seventh grade at the school where the study is conducted.
  • Aged 11-13 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having any health condition that would prevent the participant from completing the questionnaires.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
235 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual School Curriculum

    The control group continued its regular school curriculum with their teachers during the three-week intervention period.

  • Experimental
    Disordered Eating Prevention Education

    The intervention group received a three-week educational program consisting of six 40-minute sessions focused on body image, social media literacy, and healthy eating attitudes. Parents of students in the intervention group also received one 40-minute educational session.

    Behavioral: School-Based Disordered Eating Prevention Education Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralSchool-Based Disordered Eating Prevention Education Program

    The intervention consisted of three student modules and one parent module. The first module focused on body image, body satisfaction, body acceptance, and the prevention of weight- and body-related peer bullying. It was delivered by a psychologist specializing in adolescent psychology and included scenarios, videos, and positive peer feedback activities. The second module addressed social media literacy, unrealistic appearance ideals, dieting myths, online information reliability, screen time, and family meals. The third module covered healthy and balanced nutrition, food groups, the balanced plate model, and physical activity, including a classroom-based plate activity. Previous session topics were briefly reviewed at the beginning of each module. Six weeks after the intervention, a 10-minute refresher session was delivered by the researcher, a dietitian. The parent session addressed eating disorders, their symptoms and risk factors, and healthy nutrition principles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) Score

    Eating attitudes were assessed using a 24-item version of the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26). Total scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of disordered eating attitudes and behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (intervention group only), and 12-week follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short Parent Version (EDE-QS-P) Score

    Eating disorder symptoms in students were assessed from the parent perspective using the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short Parent Version (EDE-QS-P). Total scores range from 0 to 33, with higher scores indicating greater severity of eating disorder symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (intervention group only), and 12-week follow-up

  2. Change in Body Satisfaction

    Body satisfaction was assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), on which students rated their level of satisfaction with their body. The minimum possible score is 0 ("not at all satisfied"), and the maximum possible score is 10 ("very satisfied"). Higher scores indicate greater body satisfaction. Changes in body satisfaction scores were evaluated across the assessment time points.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (intervention group only), and 12-week follow-up

  3. Change in Sociocultural Attitudes

    Sociocultural attitudes toward appearance were assessed using the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 Revised (SATAQ-4R), which consists of 31 items across seven subscales assessing internalization of appearance ideals and perceived appearance-related pressures. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Possible subscale scores range from 4 to 20 for thinness/low body fat internalization and each perceived pressure subscale (family, peers, significant others, and media), from 5 to 25 for muscularity internalization, and from 6 to 30 for general attractiveness internalization. Higher subscale scores indicate greater internalization of sociocultural appearance ideals or greater perceived appearance-related pressure.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (intervention group only), and 12-week follow-up

  4. Change in Social Media Literacy

    Social media literacy was assessed using the Information Awareness dimension of the Social Media Literacy Scale (SMOÖ). This dimension evaluates students' awareness and critical understanding of information encountered on social media. The minimum possible score is 3, and the maximum possible score is 15. Higher scores indicate greater information awareness in relation to social media content.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (intervention group only), and 12-week follow-up

  5. Change in BMI-for-Age Z-Score

    BMI-for-age z-scores were calculated based on participants' measured body weight and height using age- and sex-specific reference standards. Changes in BMI-for-age z-scores were evaluated from baseline to the 12-week follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12-week follow-up

  6. Change in Waist Circumference

    Waist circumference was measured in centimeters (cm) using a non-stretchable measuring tape. Changes in waist circumference were evaluated from baseline to the 12-week follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12-week follow-up

  7. Change in Body Fat Percentage

    Body fat percentage was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Changes in body fat percentage were evaluated from baseline to the 12-week follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12-week follow-up

  8. Change in Diet Quality and Dietary Intake

    Diet quality was assessed using the Mediterranean Diet Quality Index for Children and Adolescents (KIDMED). Total KIDMED scores range from -4 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet. Dietary intake was assessed using dietary records to estimate energy and nutrient intakes. Changes in diet quality and dietary intake were evaluated from baseline to the 12-week follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12-week follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mediha Mahmutbey Secondary School
    Izmir, İzmir 35000, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2025 to primary completion in Feb 2026, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 11, 2026
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
StartActual
Nov 2, 2025
Primary completionActual
Feb 2, 2026
CompletionActual
May 5, 2026
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07885631
Responsible party
Gamze Yurtdaş Depboylu (Associate Professor, Izmir Katip Celebi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Nov 2, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2026
Completion
May 5, 2026
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion