ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07880184Updated Oct 19, 2026

Graftless Periosteal Coverage Versus Xenogenic Graft for Jumping Gap Management in Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants

An interventional study of Coronally Advanced Periosteal Flap and Particulate Xenogenic Bone Graft with Collagen Membrane in Dental Implants, sponsored by Horus University. Recruiting at 3 sites in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.

Sponsored by Horus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Sep 2026).
  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Updated Oct 19, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Graftless Periosteal Coverage Versus Xenogenic Bone Graft for Jumping Gap Management in Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants. Volumetric and density bone analysis as well as the secondary aesthetic and stability outcomes were assessed.

Read the detailed description

Graftless Periosteal Coverage versus Xenogenic Bone Graft beneath a Collagen Membrane for Jumping Gap Management in Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants. The primary outcome of volumetric and density bone analysis as well as the secondary aesthetic and stability outcomes were assessed at 4 months. Prospective, parallel-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Implants
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Horus University is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Single mandibular molar immediate implant placement, with an intraoperative jumping gap ≥ 2 mm, and adequate primary implant stability (≥30 Ncm).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes), smokers, acute infection at the site, immunosuppressive therapy, severe parafunction, or poor oral hygiene (PI > 25%).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Mucoperiosteal Coverage

    Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using a coronally advanced periosteal flap.

    Procedure: Coronally Advanced Periosteal Flap

  • Active comparator
    Particulate Bone Graft & Collagen membrane

    Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using particulate xenogenic bone graft.

    Procedure: Particulate Xenogenic Bone Graft with Collagen Membrane

Interventions

  • ProcedureCoronally Advanced Periosteal Flap

    Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using a coronally advanced periosteal flap. A minimally elevated buccal full-thickness flap will be followed by a deep-to-shallow periosteal releasing incision. The periosteum will be coronally advanced to completely cover the implant shoulder and jumping gap. The gap will be left to heal under the periosteal envelope without placement of bone graft or collagen membrane, followed by tension-free primary closure.

  • ProcedureParticulate Xenogenic Bone Graft with Collagen Membrane

    Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using particulate xenogenic bone graft. The jumping gap will be filled with particulate xenogenic bone graft, which will be covered with a resorbable collagen membrane extending approximately 2-3 mm beyond the defect margins, followed by wound closure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bone volume

    The volume of regenerated bone within the jumping gap surrounding the dental implant will be assessed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The regenerated bone volume will be measured in cubic millimeters (mm³) using standardized CBCT images and a predefined region of interest corresponding to the jumping gap. The volumetric measurements will be performed according to a standardized image-analysis protocol.

    Time frame: 4 months post-operatively

  2. Bone density

    The radiographic density of the regenerated bone surrounding the dental implant will be assessed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Bone density will be measured in Hounsfield units (HU) within a predefined region of interest corresponding to the regenerated bone around the implant. Standardized CBCT acquisition and image-analysis protocols will be used to ensure consistency of measurements.

    Time frame: 4 months post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant Stability

    Measurements will be obtained using an appropriate resonance frequency analysis device at the predefined assessment time points and expressed as an implant stability quotient (ISQ). The ISQ value, ranging from 1 to 100, will be recorded for each implant, with higher ISQ values indicating greater implant stability. For each implant, ISQ measurements will be obtained in two perpendicular directions, and the mean value will be calculated and used for statistical analysis.

    Time frame: Implant stability will be assessed at baseline and after 4 months

  2. Post-operative pain

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Participants will record their pain intensity at the specified postoperative time points.

    Time frame: days 2, 7, and 14 post-operative

  3. Patient-reported post-operative swelling

    Visual numeric rating scale (VNRS)/numeric scale for swelling, 0-10 numerical scale, which captures the patient's perception at 2, 7 and 14 days post-operative.

    Time frame: At 2, 7 and 14 days post-operative.

  4. Postoperative complications

    The occurrence of postoperative complications, including membrane exposure, flap dehiscence, and postoperative infection, will be clinically assessed at each scheduled postoperative follow-up visit. Each complication will be recorded as present or absent (yes/no), and the date of occurrence will be documented. Membrane exposure will be assessed in participants receiving the collagen membrane, while flap dehiscence and postoperative infection will be assessed in both treatment groups.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 2, 7, and 14, and monthly thereafter through 4 months.

  5. Objective facial swelling

    Standardized facial measurements in mm, will be measured at baseline + postoperative follow-ups. Postoperative facial swelling will be assessed using standardized facial linear measurements. Three facial distances (tragus to corner of mouth, tragus to pogonion, and angle of mandible to corner of mouth) will be measured preoperatively as baseline and postoperatively on days 2, 7 and 14 using a flexible measuring tape. All measurements will be performed by the same calibrated examiner using standardized anatomical landmarks and with the patient in a standardized seated position. The change in each facial measurement from baseline will be recorded as an objective measure of postoperative swelling.

    Time frame: Pre-operative (baseline), and then 2, 7 and 14 days post-operative

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Horus University, Egypt
    Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate 35111, Egypt
    Completed
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt
    Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate 35111, Egypt
    Completed
  • Dental hospital of Aswan University
    Aswān, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 23, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers because of ethical, privacy, and confidentiality considerations related to the limited sample size. Only aggregate, de-identified study results will be reported and made available through publication.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2026 to primary completion in Sep 2026, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 30, 2026
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
StartActual
Mar 31, 2026
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 20, 2026
Last update
Oct 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 19, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 19, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07880184
Lead sponsor
Horus University
Responsible party
Eman Abdel Salam Yousef (Associate Prof, Horus University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
Start date
Mar 31, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026
Completion
Oct 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2026

Study contacts

Eman Abdel-Salam, Associate Prof
Contact
moonysalam1302@gmail.com
+201556767533
Mohamed Salah Mohamed, Lecturer
Contact
+201002620460

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion