An interventional study of Coronally Advanced Periosteal Flap and Particulate Xenogenic Bone Graft with Collagen Membrane in Dental Implants, sponsored by Horus University. Recruiting at 3 sites in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.
Sponsored by Horus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Graftless Periosteal Coverage Versus Xenogenic Bone Graft for Jumping Gap Management in Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants. Volumetric and density bone analysis as well as the secondary aesthetic and stability outcomes were assessed.
Graftless Periosteal Coverage versus Xenogenic Bone Graft beneath a Collagen Membrane for Jumping Gap Management in Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants. The primary outcome of volumetric and density bone analysis as well as the secondary aesthetic and stability outcomes were assessed at 4 months. Prospective, parallel-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Horus University is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using a coronally advanced periosteal flap.
Procedure: Coronally Advanced Periosteal Flap
Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using particulate xenogenic bone graft.
Procedure: Particulate Xenogenic Bone Graft with Collagen Membrane
Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using a coronally advanced periosteal flap. A minimally elevated buccal full-thickness flap will be followed by a deep-to-shallow periosteal releasing incision. The periosteum will be coronally advanced to completely cover the implant shoulder and jumping gap. The gap will be left to heal under the periosteal envelope without placement of bone graft or collagen membrane, followed by tension-free primary closure.
Immediate mandibular molar implant placement with management of the peri-implant jumping gap using particulate xenogenic bone graft. The jumping gap will be filled with particulate xenogenic bone graft, which will be covered with a resorbable collagen membrane extending approximately 2-3 mm beyond the defect margins, followed by wound closure
Bone volume
The volume of regenerated bone within the jumping gap surrounding the dental implant will be assessed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The regenerated bone volume will be measured in cubic millimeters (mm³) using standardized CBCT images and a predefined region of interest corresponding to the jumping gap. The volumetric measurements will be performed according to a standardized image-analysis protocol.
Time frame: 4 months post-operatively
Bone density
The radiographic density of the regenerated bone surrounding the dental implant will be assessed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Bone density will be measured in Hounsfield units (HU) within a predefined region of interest corresponding to the regenerated bone around the implant. Standardized CBCT acquisition and image-analysis protocols will be used to ensure consistency of measurements.
Time frame: 4 months post-operatively
Implant Stability
Measurements will be obtained using an appropriate resonance frequency analysis device at the predefined assessment time points and expressed as an implant stability quotient (ISQ). The ISQ value, ranging from 1 to 100, will be recorded for each implant, with higher ISQ values indicating greater implant stability. For each implant, ISQ measurements will be obtained in two perpendicular directions, and the mean value will be calculated and used for statistical analysis.
Time frame: Implant stability will be assessed at baseline and after 4 months
Post-operative pain
Postoperative pain will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Participants will record their pain intensity at the specified postoperative time points.
Time frame: days 2, 7, and 14 post-operative
Patient-reported post-operative swelling
Visual numeric rating scale (VNRS)/numeric scale for swelling, 0-10 numerical scale, which captures the patient's perception at 2, 7 and 14 days post-operative.
Time frame: At 2, 7 and 14 days post-operative.
Postoperative complications
The occurrence of postoperative complications, including membrane exposure, flap dehiscence, and postoperative infection, will be clinically assessed at each scheduled postoperative follow-up visit. Each complication will be recorded as present or absent (yes/no), and the date of occurrence will be documented. Membrane exposure will be assessed in participants receiving the collagen membrane, while flap dehiscence and postoperative infection will be assessed in both treatment groups.
Time frame: Postoperative days 2, 7, and 14, and monthly thereafter through 4 months.
Objective facial swelling
Standardized facial measurements in mm, will be measured at baseline + postoperative follow-ups. Postoperative facial swelling will be assessed using standardized facial linear measurements. Three facial distances (tragus to corner of mouth, tragus to pogonion, and angle of mandible to corner of mouth) will be measured preoperatively as baseline and postoperatively on days 2, 7 and 14 using a flexible measuring tape. All measurements will be performed by the same calibrated examiner using standardized anatomical landmarks and with the patient in a standardized seated position. The change in each facial measurement from baseline will be recorded as an objective measure of postoperative swelling.
Time frame: Pre-operative (baseline), and then 2, 7 and 14 days post-operative
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers because of ethical, privacy, and confidentiality considerations related to the limited sample size. Only aggregate, de-identified study results will be reported and made available through publication.
Ran from Mar 2026 to primary completion in Sep 2026, 5 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Horus University