ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07879651SPICE-CFUpdated Oct 19, 2026

SPutum Induction and Nebuliser deviCEs for Patients With CF

An interventional study of Sputum induction in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease, sponsored by Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.

Sponsored by Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 19, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the SPICE-CF feasibility trial is to learn whether it is feasible to recruit and retain people with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are unable to produce sputum spontaneously in a study comparing two different nebuliser devices for sputum induction. The study will also assess how acceptable and practical the sputum induction procedures are.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is it feasible to recruit and retain people with cystic fibrosis in a study comparing two nebuliser devices for sputum induction?
  • Can sputum be successfully obtained using each nebuliser device?
  • How acceptable are the two nebuliser devices to participants?
  • How long does sputum induction take with each device?
  • What microorganisms are identified in sputum collected using each device?
  • Can a visual scoring system be used to distinguish sputum from saliva and describe sputum characteristics?

Researchers will compare a jet nebuliser with an E-flow Rapid nebuliser. Each participant will undergo sputum induction using both devices, with the order in which the devices are used determined at random.

Participants will:

  • Attend two study visits, separated by at least 2 weeks
  • Receive a bronchodilator before sputum induction
  • Inhale hypertonic saline using either the jet nebuliser or E-flow Rapid nebuliser
  • Perform their usual airway clearance technique with supervision from a physiotherapist
  • Have their lung function, oxygen levels, heart rate, and chest sounds monitored
  • Provide sputum produced during the procedure for assessment and routine microbiological testing
  • Complete a brief questionnaire about their experience and the acceptability of each nebuliser device
Read the detailed description

SPICE-CF is a non-commercial feasibility trial evaluating sputum induction using two different nebuliser devices in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are unable to spontaneously expectorate sputum.

With the increasing use of CFTR modulator therapies, many people with CF produce less spontaneous sputum. However, obtaining lower respiratory tract samples remains important for microbiological surveillance and clinical management. Sputum induction using nebulised hypertonic saline provides a non-invasive method of obtaining respiratory samples when spontaneous sputum is unavailable. There is currently limited evidence comparing nebuliser technologies for sputum induction in people with CF.

This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, two-period crossover feasibility trial comparing a jet nebuliser with the E-flow Rapid vibrating mesh nebuliser. Each participant will undergo sputum induction using both devices and will therefore act as their own control. The order of device use will be randomised, with a minimum two-week washout period between study visits.

Sputum induction will follow a standardised protocol using nebulised hypertonic saline together with physiotherapist supervised airway clearance. The primary focus of the study is to assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining people with CF who are unable to spontaneously expectorate sputum in a randomised crossover trial comparing two nebuliser systems for sputum induction. The study will also assess the acceptability and deliverability of the procedures and collect preliminary information on successful sputum collection, procedure duration, participant experience, microbiological yield, and the use of a visual scoring system to characterise sputum colour and viscosity and differentiate sputum from saliva. The findings will help inform the design of a future definitive randomised controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
  • Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • sputum induction
  • cystic fibrosis
  • nebuliser
  • e-flow
  • jet nebuliser
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,605 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 196 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 36 across 1,051 interventional studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 140 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of CF (confirmed by standard criteria)
  • Sixteen years of age or over

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of intolerance to hypertonic saline 3% or 7%
  • Lung function impairment (\<30%pp FEV1)
  • Hypoxia (oxygen saturations of less than 90% on room air)
  • Any haemoptysis within past 2 weeks
  • Pneumothorax within 6 weeks
  • Unstable cardiovascular status as determined by clinical assessment
  • Any known history or known family history of thoracic or cerebral aneurysm
  • Acute pulmonary emboli (within 6 weeks)
  • Acute undifferentiated chest pain
  • Fractured ribs or other chest trauma in the past 6 weeks
  • Recent eye surgery within past 6 weeks
  • Inability to perform spirometry
  • Treatment for a pulmonary exacerbation within 21 days of screening visit
  • Inability to give consent
  • Current participation in another interventional medicinal study
  • Spontaneous sputum production
  • Inability/unwillingness to expectorate
  • Pregnancy or currently trying to conceive
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Sputum induction completed via E-flow Rapid nebuliser device

    Diagnostic Test: Sputum induction

  • Active comparator
    Sputum induction completed via jet compressor nebuliser device

    Diagnostic Test: Sputum induction

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSputum induction

    Sputum induction is a non-invasive procedure used to obtain a lower respiratory tract sputum sample from individuals who are unable to expectorate sputum spontaneously. Participants inhale nebulised hypertonic saline (3% or 7%) to help mobilise airway secretions and stimulate sputum production. Nebulisation is performed in up to three five-minute periods and is combined with physiotherapist supervised airway clearance using the participant's usual airway clearance technique. Participants are encouraged to expectorate sputum throughout the nebulisation and airway clearance procedure for collection and subsequent microbiological analysis.

    Also known as: induced sputum

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of participant recruitment and retention

    Feasibility will be assessed by the number of eligible participants who consent to participate and the number of enrolled participants who complete both study visits. Recruitment and retention rates will be calculated to determine the feasibility of conducting a future definitive randomised controlled trial comparing nebuliser devices for sputum induction in adults with cystic fibrosis.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment to completion of the second study visit, assessed up to 3 months from first visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful sputum sample collection

    Sputum induction success will be assessed as whether a sputum sample of at least 1 mL is successfully obtained during each sputum induction procedure (yes/no). Success will be recorded separately for sputum induction performed using the jet nebuliser and the E-flow Rapid nebuliser.

    Time frame: During sputum induction at Visits 1 and 2, assessed within 90 minutes per visit, up to 3 months after enrolment

  2. Classification of collected samples as sputum or saliva

    Collected samples will be assessed using a study-specific standardised visual sputum scoring system. Samples will be characterised using macroscopic features including colour and viscosity to determine the presence of sputum and differentiate sputum from saliva. Assessments will be performed independently by the physiotherapist and laboratory personnel using direct assessment and the corresponding video recording

    Time frame: Following sample collection at Visits 1 and 2, up to 3 months after enrolment

  3. Participant-reported acceptability of sputum induction

    Participant experience of sputum induction using each nebuliser device will be assessed using a study-specific questionnaire completed after each study visit. The questionnaire assesses participant preference, ease of use, comfort, tolerance, and overall acceptability. Responses will be recorded using a five-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree", where appropriate.

    Time frame: Immediately following sputum induction at Visits 1 and 2, up to 3 months after enrolment

  4. Duration of sputum induction procedure

    The duration of the sputum induction procedure will be recorded for each nebuliser device. Procedure duration will be assessed separately for sputum induction performed using the jet nebuliser and the E-flow Rapid nebuliser.

    Time frame: During sputum induction at Visits 1 and 2, assessed within 90 minutes per visit, up to 3 months after enrolment

Other outcomes

  1. Microbiological yield of induced sputum samples

    Induced sputum samples successfully obtained using each nebuliser device will undergo routine microbiological analysis for cystic fibrosis relevant respiratory pathogens. Analysis will include routine microbiology culture and sensitivity (MC\&S) and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) testing

    Time frame: Samples collected at Visits 1 and 2, up to 3 months after enrolment; results assessed following laboratory processing

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Royal Brompton Hospital
    London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Collins N. (2021) Guideline for Administration of Inhaled Medication for Sputum Induction in Cystic Fibrosis via Patient Specific Direction. Unpublished internal document. London: Royal Brompton Hospital.
  • Ahmad A., Simmonds N., Stanford G. (2026) Benchmarking sputum induction (SI) practice across UK cystic fibrosis (CF) centres. [Poster]. Royal Brompton Hospital, London.
  • Ahmad A., Tobin T., Stanford G., Simmonds N. (2025) "Another one?" - dealing with an increase in sputum induction referrals in a large adult uk cystic fibrosis (CF) centre: a quality improvement initiative. [Poster]. Royal Brompton Hospital, London.
  • European Cystic Fibrosis Society Clinical Trials Network (2024) Sputum Induction for Non-expectorating Older Children and Adults. Unpublished internal document. Unknown: European Cystic Fibrosis Society.
  • Flament MP, Leterme P, Gayot A. Study of the technological parameters of ultrasonic nebulization. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2001 Aug;27(7):643-9. doi: 10.1081/ddc-100107320. PubMed 11694011 ↗
  • Ratjen F, Bell SC, Rowe SM, Goss CH, Quittner AL, Bush A. Cystic fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 May 14;1:15010. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.10. PubMed 27189798 ↗
  • Wong HH, Fahy JV. Safety of one method of sputum induction in asthmatic subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Jul;156(1):299-303. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9610114. PubMed 9230765 ↗
  • Hunter CJ, Ward R, Woltmann G, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. The safety and success rate of sputum induction using a low output ultrasonic nebuliser. Respir Med. 1999 May;93(5):345-8. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90317-7. PubMed 10464902 ↗
  • Murray MP, Pentland JL, Turnbull K, MacQuarrie S, Hill AT. Sputum colour: a useful clinical tool in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J. 2009 Aug;34(2):361-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00163208. PubMed 19648517 ↗
  • Wong LK, Barry AL, Horgan SM. Comparison of six different criteria for judging the acceptability of sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;16(4):627-31. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.4.627-631.1982. PubMed 7153311 ↗
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (2025) Sputum. Available at: https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/microbiology/a-z/sputum/
  • Davidson WJ, Dennis J, The S, Litoski B, Pieron C, Leigh R. Identification and validation of nebulized aerosol devices for sputum induction. Can Respir J. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):101-6. doi: 10.1155/2014/925305. Epub 2013 Nov 28. PubMed 24288700 ↗
  • Loh LC, Eg KP, Puspanathan P, Tang SP, Yip KS, Vijayasingham P, Thayaparan T, Kumar S. A comparison of sputum induction methods: ultrasonic vs compressed-air nebulizer and hypertonic vs isotonic saline inhalation. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2004 Mar;22(1):11-7. PubMed 15366653 ↗
  • Nie S, Wang L, Ma S, Sun H. Impact of silicone midline catheter tip location on catheter-related complications and indwelling duration: results from a multicentre randomised clinical trial in China. BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 12;15(3):e086717. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086717. PubMed 40074277 ↗
  • Paggiaro PL, Chanez P, Holz O, Ind PW, Djukanovic R, Maestrelli P, Sterk PJ. Sputum induction. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2002 Sep;37:3s-8s. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00000302. No abstract available. PubMed 12361361 ↗
  • Henig NR, Tonelli MR, Pier MV, Burns JL, Aitken ML. Sputum induction as a research tool for sampling the airways of subjects with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2001 Apr;56(4):306-11. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.4.306. PubMed 11254823 ↗
  • Collins N. Nebulizer therapy in cystic fibrosis: an overview. J R Soc Med. 2009 Jul;102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):11-7. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.s19003. No abstract available. PubMed 19605869 ↗
  • Stanford G, Morrison L, Brown C. Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 9;11(11):CD007639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007639.pub3. PubMed 37942828 ↗
  • O'Connor C., Callaghan M., Crosby C., Leeney A., Nicholson T., Rilley CM., Carter S. (2024). Sputum Induction - A Quality improvement Initiative. [Poster]. St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin
  • Cystic Fibrosis Trust (2020) Standards of care and good clinical practice for the physiotherapy management of cystic fibrosis (4th ed.). London: Cystic Fibrosis Trust. Available at: https://www.cysticfibrosis.org.uk/sites/default/files/2020-12/Standards%20of%20Care%20and%20Good%20Clinical%20Practice%20for%20the%20Physiotherapy%20Management%20of%20Cystic%20Fibrosis%20Fourth%20edition%20December%202020.pdf
  • Ronchetti K, Tame JD, Paisey C, Thia LP, Doull I, Howe R, Mahenthiralingam E, Forton JT. The CF-Sputum Induction Trial (CF-SpIT) to assess lower airway bacterial sampling in young children with cystic fibrosis: a prospective internally controlled interventional trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Jun;6(6):461-471. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30171-1. Epub 2018 May 16. PubMed 29778403 ↗
  • Cystic Fibrosis Trust (2023) Laboratory standards for processing microbiological samples from people with cystic fibrosis (2nd ed.). London: Cystic Fibrosis Trust. Available at: https://www.cysticfibrosis.org.uk/sites/default/files/2023-01/CF%20Lab%20Standards%20FINAL.pdf
  • Cystic Fibrosis Trust (2020) Standards of care and good clinical practice for the physiotherapy management of cystic fibrosis (4th edition). London: Cystic Fibrosis Trust. Available at: https://www.cysticfibrosis.org.uk/sites/default/files/2020-12/Cystic%20Fibrosis%20Trust%20Standards%20of%20care.pdf
  • Schaupp L, Addante A, Voller M, Fentker K, Kuppe A, Bardua M, Duerr J, Piehler L, Rohmel J, Thee S, Kirchner M, Ziehm M, Lauster D, Haag R, Gradzielski M, Stahl M, Mertins P, Boutin S, Graeber SY, Mall MA. Longitudinal effects of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on sputum viscoelastic properties, airway infection and inflammation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2023 Aug 3;62(2):2202153. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02153-2022. Print 2023 Aug. PubMed 37414422 ↗
  • Kapouni N, Moustaki M, Douros K, Loukou I. Efficacy and Safety of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review. Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 15;10(3):554. doi: 10.3390/children10030554. PubMed 36980112 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 8, 2026
  • Informed consent form · Jun 30, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 19, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 19, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07879651
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2026

Study contacts

Gemma Stanford, BSc (Hons), PhD
Contact
gemma.stanford2@nhs.net
+44 20 7351 8071
Afrasiab Ahmad, BSc (Hons)
Contact
afrasiab.ahmad2@nhs.net
+44 20 7351 8071

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion