ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07878507Updated Oct 16, 2026

Smart Knee Evaluation of Exparel and Zynrelef in TKA Recovery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intra-articular injection of bupivacaine in the knee joint and intra-articular injection of Exparel in the knee joint in Total Knee Anthroplasty, sponsored by Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study looks at how three different numbing injections affect how quickly patients recover after knee replacement surgery (total knee arthroplasty, or TKA). Pain after knee replacement is common and can slow down how soon patients get moving again. Doctors often inject a numbing medication around the knee during surgery to help control this pain, but it is not clear which medication helps patients recover fastest in the first few days after surgery.

The study compares three injections that are all FDA approved and already used as part of routine knee replacement care: Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine), Zynrelef (bupivacaine with meloxicam), and Marcaine (bupivacaine). Exparel and Zynrelef are the two groups being studied, and Marcaine is the comparison (control) group.

Adults who are already planning to have a knee replacement may take part. People who join are placed into one of the three injection groups at random, so each person has a one in three chance of receiving each injection. Patients are not told which injection they received. Everything else about the surgery, anesthesia, and recovery care stays the same as usual.

The main goal is to see which injection helps patients recover best in the first three days after surgery. To measure recovery, the study team collects information on pain, pain-medication use, knee motion, activity level, and function. Patients complete short questionnaires about their activity, pain, and quality of life at their regular visits (before surgery and at 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years). A smart knee implant also records information about knee movement and motion at 3 and 7 days after surgery. About 200 people will take part. The study is considered minimal risk, meaning the risks are similar to those of having a knee replacement outside of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Total Knee Anthroplasty

Keywords

  • Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • Intra-articular Injection
  • Early Recovery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to undergo primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty for symptomatic end-stage osteoarthritis, with the Persona IQ implant.
  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test \<20 seconds
  • Planned to receive a periarticular injection of either liposomal bupivacaine, bupivacaine mixed with meloxicam, or bupivacaine hydrochloride alone as part of surgical care.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent and to complete the first-week assessment schedule.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision or unicompartmental-only knee replacement.
  • Diabetes with A1c >7.5
  • Morbid obesity with BMI >40 kg/m2
  • Chronic opioid use
  • PJI/Infection
  • Documented allergy or intolerance to amide-type local anesthetics.
  • Severe inflammatory arthropathy (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) with more than 4 joints affected.
  • Objective evidence of nerve damage in the affected limb, or another condition precluding the assessments or the intervention.
  • Inability to provide informed consent or to complete the first-week assessments; or concurrent enrollment in another interventional drug trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exparel

    These patients will receive Exparel as their Intra-articular injection

    Drug: intra-articular injection of Exparel in the knee joint

  • Experimental
    Zynrelef

    These patients will receive Zynrelef as their Intra-articular injection

    Drug: Zynrelef

  • Active comparator
    Bupivicaine

    These patients will receive Bupivicaine as their Intra-articular injection

    Drug: Intra-articular injection of bupivacaine in the knee joint

Interventions

  • DrugIntra-articular injection of bupivacaine in the knee joint

    The intervention is the use of bupivacaine for the intra-articular injection

  • Drugintra-articular injection of Exparel in the knee joint

    The intervention is the intra-articular injection of Exparel in the knee joint

  • DrugZynrelef

    The intervention is the use of Zynbrelef for the intra-articular injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Early Functional Recovery

    To compare the rate of early functional recovery during the first 3 postoperative days, measured as the change/improvement over time in objective gait metrics and daily total qualified step count, between the Exparel group, Zynrelef group, and the bupivacaine hydrochloride alone group.

    Time frame: First 3 days post-op

Secondary outcomes

  1. ROM

    To compare the rate of improvement in knee/functional range of motion (ROM) at 1 week post-operatively and out to 2 years post-operatively

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post-operatively

  2. Visual Analogue Scale

    To compare postoperative pain scores (VAS/numeric). The scale is from 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain.

    Time frame: 2 years post-op

  3. Opioid Consumption

    To compare cumulative opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents)

    Time frame: 2 years post-op

  4. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain

    To compare the KOOS Pain subscale is from 0-100 with higher scores meaning worse knee problems

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  5. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms

    To compare the KOOS Symptoms subscale, which is from 0-100 with higher scores meaning worse knee problems

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  6. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Function

    To compare the KOOS Function subscale, which is from 0-100 with higher scores meaning worse knee problems

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  7. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport & Recreation

    To compare the KOOS Sport \& Recreation subscale, which is from 0-100 with higher scores meaning worse knee problems

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  8. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life

    To compare the KOOS Quality of Life subscale, which is from 0-100 with higher scores meaning worse knee problems

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  9. Knee Society Score (KSS)

    To compare the KSS score - Scale is from 0-100 with higher scores meaning fewer knee problems

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  10. UCLA Activity Score

    To compare the UCLA Activity Score is from 1-10 with higher scores meaning higher levels of activity

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  11. Tegner Activity Score

    To compare the Tegner Activity Score is from 0-10 with higher scores meaning higher levels of activity

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

  12. 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) Quality of Life Score

    To compare the EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Score is from 1-10 with higher scores meaning higher levels problem severity

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

Other outcomes

  1. Age

    Explore whether age modifies early recovery within and across groups.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Sex

    To compare whether sex modifies early recovery within and across groups.

    Time frame: 2 years post-op

  3. Height

    To explore whether height modifies early recovery within and across groups.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Weight

    To explore whether weight modifies early recovery within and across groups.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. BMI

    To explore whether BMI modifies early recovery within and across groups, by combining patient height (cm) and weight (kg).

    Time frame: 2 years post-op

  6. Cost

    To compare the overall cost of injection for patients across each group.

    Time frame: 2 years post-opb

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kuang MJ, Du Y, Ma JX, He W, Fu L, Ma XL. The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Using Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1395-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.025. Epub 2016 Dec 23. PubMed 28082044 ↗
  • Lyman S, Hidaka C, Fields K, Islam W, Mayman D. Monitoring Patient Recovery After THA or TKA Using Mobile Technology. HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):358-365. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09746-3. Epub 2020 Feb 12. PubMed 33380968 ↗
  • Cushner FD, Hunter OF, Lee DC. How Active Are Our Patients in the First 6 Weeks Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8 Suppl 1):S125-S129. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.071. Epub 2024 Feb 28. PubMed 38428687 ↗
  • Lee GC, Berkowitz R, Hacker S, Hu J, Rechter A. HTX-011 in Combination with Multimodal Analgesic Regimen Minimized Severe Pain and Opioid Use after Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Open-Label Study. J Knee Surg. 2023 Jul;36(9):925-932. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1747945. Epub 2022 Jun 10. PubMed 35688442 ↗
  • Yip T, Hu J, Hawn PS, Yamamoto A, Oderda G. HTX-011 effectively reduces postoperative pain intensity and opioid use in the elderly. Pain Manag. 2022 Jan;12(1):45-57. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0043. Epub 2021 Jul 21. PubMed 34284613 ↗
  • Lachiewicz PF, Lee GC, Pollak RA, Leiman DG, Hu J, Sah AP. HTX-011 Reduced Pain and Opioid Use After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Randomized Phase 2b Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Oct;35(10):2843-2851. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.044. Epub 2020 May 27. PubMed 32561266 ↗
  • Yu S, Szulc A, Walton S, Bosco J, Iorio R. Pain Control and Functional Milestones in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Femoral Nerve Block. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):110-117. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4740-4. PubMed 26883652 ↗
  • Mont MA, Beaver WB, Dysart SH, Barrington JW, Del Gaizo DJ. Local Infiltration Analgesia With Liposomal Bupivacaine Improves Pain Scores and Reduces Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Jul 25. PubMed 28802777 ↗
  • Hamilton TW, Knight R, Stokes JR, Rombach I, Cooper C, Davies L, Dutton SJ, Barker KL, Cook J, Lamb SE, Murray DW, Poulton L, Wang A, Strickland LH, Van Duren BH, Leal J, Beard D, Pandit HG; Study of Peri-Articular Anaesthetic for Replacement of the Knee (SPAARK) Study Group. Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Hydrochloride vs Bupivacaine Hydrochloride Alone as a Periarticular Anesthetic for Patients Undergoing Knee Replacement: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):481-489. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0713. PubMed 35385072 ↗
  • Hamilton TW, Athanassoglou V, Mellon S, Strickland LH, Trivella M, Murray D, Pandit HG. Liposomal bupivacaine infiltration at the surgical site for the management of postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD011419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011419.pub2. PubMed 28146271 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with researchers outside the study team. The study collects identifiable clinical data as part of routine total knee arthroplasty care, and participants consent to its use only for this study. As stated in the informed consent, participant data will not be used or distributed for future research studies, even with identifiers removed. Any future sharing would require a separate protocol and IRB approval, along with participant re-consent where applicable.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 14 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 1, 2026
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 25, 2028
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07878507
Lead sponsor
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education
Collaborators
Zimmer Biomet, Florida Orthopaedic Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 25, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Andy Nguyen, BS
Contact
anguyen@foreonline.org
8139789700
Debbi Warren, RN, CCRC, ACRP-CP
Contact
dwarren@foreonline.org
8139789700
Steven Lyons, MD
principal investigator · Florida Orthopaedic Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion