ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07876791Updated Oct 15, 2026

Multimodality Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

An observational study in ST Elevation (STEMI) Myocardial Infarction and Microvascular Obstruction (MVO), sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

Updated Oct 15, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Although primary PCI successfully restores blood flow in the blocked coronary artery, some patients continue to have impaired blood flow within the small vessels of the heart muscle, a condition known as microvascular obstruction (MVO). This complication may be associated with greater myocardial injury and poorer clinical outcomes.

The study will investigate whether artificial intelligence (AI)-derived electrocardiographic (ECG) features, coronary angiographic parameters, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings can provide complementary information about myocardial reperfusion.

Patients undergoing primary PCI will be assessed using ECG and angiographic findings, while CMR will be used to evaluate myocardial injury and microvascular obstruction.

The main objective is to determine whether combining AI-derived ECG features and angiographic parameters can improve the prediction of CMR-detected microvascular obstruction after primary PCI.

The findings may help identify patients at increased risk of impaired myocardial reperfusion and support future risk assessment strategies following STEMI.

Read the detailed description

Background ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is usually caused by acute thrombotic coronary occlusion and requires rapid reperfusion. Contemporary acute coronary syndrome guidance prioritizes primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when it can be delivered promptly, because shortening total ischemic time is central to myocardial salvage.

Restoration of epicardial patency, however, does not guarantee restoration of tissue-level perfusion. A patient may have a technically successful primary PCI with final TIMI grade 3 flow yet still have substantial coronary microvascular injury. Distal embolization, ischemia-reperfusion injury, endothelial swelling, capillary plugging, edema and intramyocardial hemorrhage can produce microvascular obstruction (MVO), which is associated with larger infarct size, impaired ventricular recovery and adverse remodeling.

Conventional bedside and cath-lab markers of myocardial reperfusion include ST-segment resolution (STR), final TIMI flow, myocardial blush grade (MBG) and corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC). These measurements are clinically accessible but capture different components of reperfusion and may remain discordant. Angiography-derived indices of microcirculatory resistance provide an additional pressure-wire-free estimate of microvascular dysfunction and have shown association with CMR-defined MVO and infarct size after STEMI.

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a reference tissue-level assessment after reperfused STEMI. Cine imaging quantifies ventricular volumes and function, while late gadolinium enhancement can quantify infarct size and identify MVO. When appropriate sequences are available, CMR can additionally characterize myocardial edema and intramyocardial hemorrhage. This makes CMR particularly suitable for validating whether electrical and angiographic markers truly reflect myocardial reperfusion.

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a complementary approach to the routine 12-lead ECG. Traverse and colleagues reported that AI-detected features from pre- and post-reperfusion ECGs were associated with CMR-defined MVO after STEMI, supporting the concept that residual electrical signatures after reperfusion may contain information beyond conventional ST-segment analysis. Rather than developing a new deep-learning system from a small cohort, the present protocol proposes use of a validated AI-ECG platform to extract prespecified features, which will then be integrated with conventional ECG and angiographic variables and tested against CMR-defined myocardial injury.

The proposed study therefore treats reperfusion as a multimodality phenotype: electrical recovery on ECG, epicardial and tissue-level angiographic reperfusion in the cath lab, and tissue injury on CMR. Follow-up echocardiography will then determine whether this early phenotype is associated with subsequent left-ventricular (LV) recovery or adverse remodeling.

Rationale and Research Gap Previous studies have generally evaluated ECG, angiographic microvascular indices, or CMR findings in isolation. The recent AI-ECG study demonstrated proof-of-concept for identifying MVO from AI-detected ECG features, while recent angiography-derived microvascular resistance studies demonstrated incremental association with CMR-defined MVO and infarct size (2,5). However, the incremental value of integrating AI-derived ECG features with readily available angiographic reperfusion parameters in a prospective primary-PCI cohort remains insufficiently characterized, particularly when CMR is used as the tissue-level reference and later LV remodeling is assessed.

The proposed study will therefore determine whether AI-derived electrical reperfusion markers add information beyond conventional STR, MBG and cTFC for identifying CMR-defined MVO. The study will also evaluate whether the multimodality reperfusion phenotype is associated with infarct size, LV function and subsequent LV remodeling.

Research Question Can integration of artificial intelligence-derived ECG features with conventional electrocardiographic and angiographic reperfusion parameters improve identification of cardiac magnetic resonance-defined microvascular injury after successful primary PCI in patients with STEMI, and is this multimodality reperfusion phenotype associated with subsequent LV remodeling? Hypotheses Primary hypothesis Persistent abnormal AI-derived ECG features after successful primary PCI, particularly limited improvement from pre- to post-reperfusion ECG, are independently associated with CMR-defined MVO.

Secondary mechanistic hypotheses

  • Impaired angiographic tissue reperfusion, expressed by lower MBG and higher cTFC despite final epicardial TIMI 3 flow, is associated with CMR-defined MVO and larger infarct size.
  • A multimodality model combining clinical variables, conventional ECG, AI-derived ECG features and angiographic parameters discriminates CMR-defined MVO better than conventional reperfusion markers alone.
  • CMR-defined MVO and larger infarct size are associated with less improvement in LVEF and GLS and with adverse LV remodeling at 3-6 months.
  • Patients with final TIMI 3 flow but discordant electrical/angiographic tissue-level reperfusion represent an occult microvascular-failure phenotype with greater CMR injury.

Aim of the Work To evaluate the integrated value of artificial intelligence-derived ECG features and angiographic reperfusion parameters for identification of CMR-defined microvascular injury following successful primary PCI in patients with STEMI and to assess their relationship with subsequent LV functional recovery and remodeling.

02

Conditions studied

  • ST Elevation (STEMI) Myocardial Infarction
  • Microvascular Obstruction (MVO)

Keywords

  • Primary Percutaneous Coronary intervention
  • ST-Elevation Myocardial Ifarction
  • Microvascular Obstruction
  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Electrocardiography
  • Myocardial Reperfusion
03

In context

ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

688 studies on the registry are indexed under ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; 184 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 335 across 229 observational studies indexed under ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Browse ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,050 studies on the registry; 2,174 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive adult patients presenting with a first STEMI and treated with primary PCI will be screened. The primary analysis cohort will include patients with technically successful primary PCI, analyzable pre- and post-reperfusion ECGs, interpretable angiographic reperfusion assessment and diagnostic early CMR.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • First acute STEMI diagnosed according to contemporary guideline criteria and selected for a primary PCI strategy.
  • Identifiable infarct-related coronary artery treated by primary PCI.
  • Successful restoration of epicardial coronary flow, preferably final TIMI grade 3 flow for the primary mechanistic cohort.
  • Technically adequate 12-lead ECG before reperfusion and standardized post-reperfusion ECG.
  • Angiograms of adequate quality for TIMI flow, MBG and cTFC assessment.
  • Ability to undergo contrast-enhanced CMR during the index admission.
  • Written informed consent for study participation and follow-up. Exclusion criteria
  • Previous myocardial infarction with established scar likely to confound CMR infarct characterization or ECG interpretation.
  • Previous CABG.
  • Known cardiomyopathy or pre-existing significant LV systolic dysfunction unrelated to the index STEMI.
  • Significant primary valvular heart disease.
  • Ventricular paced rhythm or other ECG condition that prevents reliable prespecified ECG analysis, according to the requirements of the AI platform.
  • Persistent severe hemodynamic instability or other clinical condition preventing safe CMR.
  • Contraindication to MRI or gadolinium contrast according to institutional CMR policy.
  • Non-diagnostic CMR for the primary endpoint.
  • Poor-quality angiography precluding core reperfusion measurements.
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • STEMI Patients undergoing Primary PCI

    This cohort will include adult patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants will undergo assessment of conventional and artificial intelligence (AI)-derived electrocardiographic features, coronary angiographic parameters, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings to evaluate myocardial reperfusion. Angiographic assessment will include parameters such as TIMI flow grade, myocardial blush grade, and corrected TIMI frame count. CMR will be used to assess myocardial injury and the presence and extent of microvascular obstruction (MVO). The study will investigate the association between ECG and angiographic parameters and CMR-detected MVO. All participants will belong to a single observational cohort, with subsequent comparisons according to the presence or absence of MVO. No experimental treatment allocation will be performed, and clinical management will follow standard insti

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Cardiac MRI-Detected Microvascular Obstruction After Primary PCI

    The proportion of patients with microvascular obstruction (MVO) detected by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) following primary PCI. MVO will be identified as a hypointense region within the hyperenhanced infarcted myocardium on late gadolinium enhancement images. The primary outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of patients with MVO.

    Time frame: Use the actual CMR acquisition window specified in your protocol. For example, if CMR is scheduled 3-7 days after PCI: Within 3-7 Days After Primary PCI [Copy] The 3-7-day window is an example, not a confirmed detail from your protocol.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Predictive performance of combined model

    AUROC for prediction of CMR detected MVO

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Infarct Size

    Percentage of LV myocardial Mass on CMR

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Left Ventricular ejection fraction

    LVEF % by CMR

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. intramyocardial hemorrhage

    Presence or absence on CMR.

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • van 't Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation. 1998 Jun 16;97(23):2302-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.23.2302. PubMed 9639373 ↗
  • Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT Jr, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Raymond L, Fortin T, Poole WK, Braunwald E. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):879-88. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.5.879. PubMed 8598078 ↗
  • Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, Kim RJ, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Kramer CM, Pennell DJ, Plein S, Nagel E. Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Mar 12;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6. PubMed 32160925 ↗
  • Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1. PubMed 32089132 ↗
  • Pollio Benvenuto C, Galante D, Zimmermann F, Vicere A, Viccaro V, Giuliana C, Todisco S, Bellamoli M, Bettari L, Maffeo D, Burzotta F, Leone AM, Buono A. Angiography-Derived Index of Microvascular Resistance in Patients With Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2026 Mar 15;263:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.11.023. Epub 2025 Dec 31. PubMed 41482053 ↗
  • Wang L, Travieso A, van der Hoeven N, Lombardi M, van Leeuwen MAH, Janssens G, Shabbir A, Mejia-Renteria H, Milasinovic D, Gonzalo N, Nijveldt R, van Royen N, Escaned J. Angiography-versus wire-based microvascular resistance index to detect coronary microvascular obstruction associated with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 15;411:132256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132256. Epub 2024 Jun 10. PubMed 38866108 ↗
  • Wen X, Wang Z, Zheng B, Gong Y, Huo Y. Ability of the coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance to predict microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment elevation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 22;11:1187599. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1187599. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38711790 ↗
  • Traverse JH, Meyers P, Rafajdus A, Sharkey SW, Schwager S, Stanberry L, Herman R. Association Between Artificial Intelligence-Detected Features on the ECG and Presence of Microvascular Obstruction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Jan;19(1):e016104. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016104. Epub 2025 Nov 10. No abstract available. PubMed 41212803 ↗
  • Fan Y, Li C, Hu Y, Hu X, Wang S, He J, Leng X, Xiang J, Lu Z. Angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance (AccuIMR) for the assessment of microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome and chronic coronary syndrome. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):3556-3568. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-961. Epub 2023 Apr 17. PubMed 37284070 ↗
  • De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Shanmuganathan M, Kotronias RA, Terentes-Printzios D, Borlotti A, Langrish JP, Lucking AJ, Choudhury RP, Kharbanda R, Ferreira VM; Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction (OXAMI) Study Investigators; Channon KM, Garcia-Garcia HM, Banning AP. Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance as a novel, pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microcirculation in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Aug;36(8):1395-1406. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01831-7. Epub 2020 May 14. PubMed 32409977 ↗
  • Sheng X, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Chen J, Xiang J, Ding S, Pu J. Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Predicts Microvascular Obstruction and Infarct Size in Patients With STEMI. JACC Asia. 2026 Jul 28:S2772-3747(26)00445-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.06.013. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42541504 ↗
  • Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, Claeys MJ, Dan GA, Dweck MR, Galbraith M, Gilard M, Hinterbuchner L, Jankowska EA, Juni P, Kimura T, Kunadian V, Leosdottir M, Lorusso R, Pedretti RFE, Rigopoulos AG, Rubini Gimenez M, Thiele H, Vranckx P, Wassmann S, Wenger NK, Ibanez B; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191. No abstract available. PubMed 37622654 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07876791
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Bakeer Mohamed Bakeer (Fellow of adult cardiology at Aswan Heart Center MYF, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Bakeer M Saleh, MSc
Contact
bakeer.saleeh@med.aun.edu.eg
+201119427024
Hamdy S Mohamed, PHD
study director · Professor
Magdy I Eldesoky, PHD
study director · Assistent Professor
Mohamed A Ali, PHD
study director · Lecturer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion