An interventional study of Compassionate Access Targeted Therapy in Colonrectal Cancer and Colonrectal Cancer (CRC), sponsored by Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.
Sponsored by Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a compassion-based intervention compared with standard procedure for rehabilitation needs assessment among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer with curative intent.
Participants were randomly assigned to either a structured, compassion-supported rehabilitation needs assessment or standard postoperative care. The intervention focused on identifying physical, psychological, and social rehabilitation needs through compassionate communication and facilitating referral to municipal cancer rehabilitation services.
The primary outcome was health-related quality of life measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) at three months. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, self-compassion, and participation in cancer rehabilitation.
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged 18 years or older.
Patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer (colon or rectal cancer).
Able to speak and understand Danish.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients younger than 18 years.
Patients unable to speak or understand Danish.
Patients not undergoing surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer.
-
Participants allocated to the control group received standard postoperative care following colorectal cancer surgery. Approximately two weeks after surgery, patients attended an outpatient follow-up consultation with a physician and a colorectal nurse. Subsequently, a nurse from the outpatient clinic conducted a telephone follow-up during which rehabilitation needs could be assessed using the standard needs assessment checklist. Patients with identified rehabilitation needs could be referred to municipal cancer rehabilitation services according to routine clinical procedures. No additional compassion-supported consultation was provided.
Participants allocated to the intervention group received standard postoperative care followed by an additional structured, compassion-supported rehabilitation needs assessment approximately seven days after the standard postoperative follow-up. The intervention consisted of an approximately 30-minute face-to-face consultation conducted by a registered nurse trained in compassion-based approaches. The consultation focused on identifying physical, psychological, and social rehabilitation needs through compassionate communication, attentive listening, and non-judgmental dialogue. Identified needs were discussed with the patient, and referral to municipal cancer rehabilitation services was facilitated through shared decision-making when appropriate.
Behavioral: Compassionate Access Targeted Therapy
The intervention consisted of a structured, compassion-supported rehabilitation needs assessment delivered during an approximately 30-minute face-to-face consultation with a registered nurse trained in compassion-based approaches. The consultation took place approximately seven days after the standard postoperative follow-up visit. The intervention incorporated three components: (1) systematic identification of physical, psychological, and social rehabilitation needs using the standard needs assessment framework; (2) compassion-supported communication characterized by attentive listening, presence, openness, non-judgment, and sensitivity to patients' concerns; and (3) shared decision-making regarding referral to municipal cancer rehabilitation services. When rehabilitation needs were identified and the patient agreed, referral to municipal cancer rehabilitation was facilitated according to standard hospital procedures.
Health-Related Quality of Life Measured by FACT-C Total Score
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire. The FACT-C measures physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as colorectal cancer-specific concerns. The total score ranges from 0 to 136, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in FACT-C total score at the three-month follow-up.
Time frame: 3 months after the intervention
Anxiety Severity Measured by m-ESAS
Anxiety will be assessed using the anxiety item from the Modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (m-ESAS). Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity. Scores will be compared between the intervention and standard procedure groups.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Depression Severity Measured by m-ESAS
Depression will be assessed using the depression item from the Modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (m-ESAS). Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater depression severity. Scores will be compared between the intervention and standard procedure groups.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Self-Compassion Measured by the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-26)
Self-compassion will be assessed using the 26-item Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-26), comprising six subscales: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. Items are rated on a five-point scale from 1 to 5. A total self-compassion score is calculated after reverse scoring negatively worded items, with higher scores indicating greater self-compassion.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Participation in Municipal Cancer Rehabilitation
The proportion of participants who reported participation in municipal cancer rehabilitation services will be assessed at the three-month follow-up. Participation is defined as patient-reported engagement in a municipal cancer rehabilitation program during the follow-up period. The proportion of participants reporting rehabilitation participation will be compared between the two randomized groups.
Time frame: Within 3 months after the intervention
Plan to share: No — The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy and data protection regulations. Data sharing is restricted by applicable Danish data protection legislation and institutional requirements.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark