ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07872293Updated Oct 13, 2026

Effects of Five Stones Pebble Game on In-Hand Manipulation and Hand Writing Skills of School-going Children

An interventional study of Five Stones Pebble Game and Unstructured Play Group in Child Development, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered May 2026).
Updated Oct 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will be conducted on 26 school-going children (aged 8-12 years) from The City School and Classic School System, randomly assigned to a traditional play group or an unstructured gameplay group (n=13 each). The Five Stones Pebble Game intervention will be administered for 5 weeks, with 30-minute sessions, four times per week. In-hand manipulation will be assessed using Timed-TIHM, Box and Blocks Test, and Nine Hole Peg Test, while handwriting will be evaluated using ETCH. Ethical approval will be obtained from Riphah International University, and data will be analyzed using SPSS version 23.0.

Read the detailed description

A child's ability to use fine motor skills is essential for both academic and everyday functioning, especially when it comes to writing, clothing, and object manipulation. Effective handwriting and hand function are directly impacted by in-hand manipulation (IHM), an aspect of fine motor abilities that includes precise control over tiny items in the hand. Writing by hand is an intricate technique that calls for dexterity, hand strength, and fine motor coordination. The ability of traditional games to improve fine motor skills in an entertaining and captivating way has drawn attention recently. One of them is the Five Stones Pebble game, which is a traditional game in many Asian nations that requires players to hold, throw, and manipulate tiny stones with just one hand. Although it's a widespread recreational game, little is known about its academic or developmental benefits, particularly when it comes to helping school-aged kids with their hand function. The purpose of this study is to close that gap by investigating how playing the Five Stones Pebble Game affected the handwriting and in-hand manipulation abilities of school-age children who were normally developing. The goal is to determine whether a traditional game that is inexpensive, non-intrusive, and readily available may be a useful intervention to support children's academic performance and fine motor development.

The study design will be Randomized Controlled Trial. The data will be collected from The city school and Classic School System. The study will be compiled in 10 months after the approval of synopsis. 26 school-going children age ranged from 8 to 12 years will randomly be assigned either in to traditional play group (n=13) or unstructured game play (n=13). the intervention five Stone Pebble Game will continue for five weeks, with 30 minutes session, four times a week. All the referred participants will be assessed for the eligibility criteria. Guardians of participants fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be asked to sign the consent forms before entering them to the study. In-Hand manipulation will be asses by Times Test of In-Hand Manipulation (Timed-TIHM) test, Box and Blocks Test and Nine Hole Peg Test. Handwriting will be assessed by Evaluation Tool of Children's Handwriting (ETCH) tool. The synopsis will be presented to the Research Ethical Committee of Riphah International University, Lahore, for ethical approval to conduct this study. Data will be analyzed through SPSS version 23.0

02

Conditions studied

  • Child Development
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,176 studies on the registry; 637 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Typically developing children
  • Age 8 to 12 years
  • Have English as their primary language of education, regardless of their home language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children having and physical, emotional or cognitive disability
  • Children whose parents had not given consent for participation
  • Children who had previously received or currently receiving occupational therapy for hand function difficulties
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Five Stones Pebble Game Group

    \*\*Group A (Traditional Group):\*\* The traditional group will be taught the Five Stones Pebble Game consisting of five levels. In Level 1, five stones are scattered and the child throws one stone in the air, picks one from the surface, and catches the airborne stone, repeating until all are collected. In Level 2, the child picks two stones at a time, and in Level 3, three stones at a time using the same method. In Level 4, one stone is tossed while the remaining four are scattered, then picked together before catching the airborne stone. In Level 5, the child tosses all five stones and catches them on the back of the hand, then tosses again and catches them in the palm.

    Other: Five Stones Pebble Game

  • Experimental
    Unstructured Play Group

    The child will go through unstructured play in the indoor environment. During this time, he is free to explore and initiate activities. The child may involve in activities such as block play, dough play and arts and crafts.

    Other: Unstructured Play Group

Interventions

  • OtherFive Stones Pebble Game

    \*\*Group A (Traditional Group):\*\* The traditional group will be taught the Five Stones Pebble Game consisting of five levels. In Level 1, five stones are scattered and the child throws one stone in the air, picks one from the surface, and catches the airborne stone, repeating until all are collected. In Level 2, the child picks two stones at a time, and in Level 3, three stones at a time using the same method. In Level 4, one stone is tossed while the remaining four are scattered, then picked together before catching the airborne stone. In Level 5, the child tosses all five stones and catches them on the back of the hand, then tosses again and catches them in the palm.

  • OtherUnstructured Play Group

    The child will go through unstructured play in the indoor environment. During this time, he is free to explore and initiate activities. The child may involve in activities such as block play, dough play and arts and crafts.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Box and Block Test (BBT).

    The Box and Block Test measures unilateral gross manual dexterity by recording the number of blocks transferred from one compartment to another within 60 seconds

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    The Nine-Hole Peg Test measures fine motor speed and finger dexterity by recording the time required to place and remove nine pegs.

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Children Hospital and University of Child Health Sciences
    Lahore, Punjab Province 51310, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Duncan GJ, Dowsett CJ, Claessens A, Magnuson K, Huston AC, Klebanov P, Pagani LS, Feinstein L, Engel M, Brooks-Gunn J, Sexton H, Duckworth K, Japel C. School readiness and later achievement. Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1428-1446. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428. PubMed 18020822 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2025 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 4, 2026
First posted
Oct 13, 2026
StartActual
Oct 28, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jun 15, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 15, 2026
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07872293
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2026
Start date
Oct 28, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2026
Completion
Jun 15, 2026
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

Sheeza Sami, MS-PT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion