ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07868991OPTIMISEUpdated Oct 9, 2026

'No-test' Tele-abortion: a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial

An interventional study of no-test medical abortion and Standard Care (in control arm) in Medical Abortion, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Not yet recruiting at 10 sites in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
978
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Brief Summary The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a no-test telemedicine medical abortion model can provide abortion care that is as effective and safe as standard clinic-based medical abortion care among women aged 18 years and older with an early pregnancy who wish to have a medical abortion at home.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is no-test telemedicine medical abortion (without routine ultrasound) as effective as standard clinic-based medical abortion (with routine ultrasound) in achieving complete abortion?
  • Is no-test telemedicine medical abortion as safe, acceptable, and cost-effective as standard clinic-based medical abortion? Researchers will compare no-test telemedicine medical abortion to standard clinic-based medical abortion to determine whether the telemedicine model results in similar effectiveness and safety outcomes while improving access to care.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to receive either no-test telemedicine medical abortion or standard clinic-based medical abortion.
  • Receive counseling and clinical assessment according to their assigned care model.
  • Use medical abortion treatment at home.
  • Complete follow-up assessments approximately 6 weeks after the abortion.
  • Provide information about treatment outcomes, complications, healthcare contacts, satisfaction with care, and contraceptive use.

This study will enroll 978 women across five healthcare regions in Sweden. The results will inform future evidence-based guidelines for medical abortion care and may improve access to abortion services, particularly for individuals living in rural and underserved areas.

02

Conditions studied

  • Medical Abortion

Keywords

  • No-test abortion
  • tele-abortion
  • telemedicin
  • medical abortion
  • randomised controlled trial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,145 studies on the registry; 274 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Pregnant less than or equal to 10+0 weeks according to date for the LMP
  2. Age ≥18 years
  3. Wiling to perform MA at home
  4. Regular menses prior to this pregnancy
  5. Willing to undergo an abortion without prior clinical examinations (gynaecological examination and ultrasound)
  6. Willing and able to receive information remotely
  7. Willing and able to provide electronic informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications to MA (known allergy to mifepristone or misoprostol)
  2. Health condition requiring in-clinic abortion
  3. Uncertainty around the dates for LMP,
  4. Hormonal contraception used \< 3 months
  5. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy (previous ectopic pregnancy, previous tubal surgery or tubal ligation, use of intrauterine contraception at conception, signs of pelvic inflammatory disease)
  6. Symptoms of pathologic pregnancy (bleeding and/or pain)
  7. No proficiency in Swedish or English
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
978 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    No-test tele-abortion

    'No-test' tele-abortion (intervention arm)

    Other: no-test medical abortion

  • Active comparator
    Standard care medical abortion

    Standard care (control arm)

    Other: Standard Care (in control arm)

Interventions

  • Otherno-test medical abortion

    'No-test' tele-abortion i.e., medical abortion delivered via telecommunications (phone and web-based) and the medical abortion self-managed at home. Prior in clinic-visit with routine testing (ultrasound, pelvic exam) is omitted and the eligibility assessment is history-based. To meet current legal requirements, mifepristone is taken during a brief in-clinic pick-up visit of a medical abortion kit.

    Also known as: teleabortion

  • OtherStandard Care (in control arm)

    Standard care defined as in-clinic provision of medical abortion, delivered during one in-clinic consultation with routine testing (ultrasound, pelvic exam), information provision and mifepristone-intake, followed by misoprostol intake at home.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete abortion

    Effectiveness of 'no-test' tele-abortion, measured in the proportion of complete abortion with no ongoing pregnancy or surgical intervention for incomplete abortion, within 42 days of the medical abortion (mifepristone intake).

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

Secondary outcomes

  1. Additional abortion treatment

    Any additional treatment the participant has received to complete the abortion including medical (misoprostol or mifepristone and misoprostol) or surgical (uterine aspiration) treatment

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  2. Rates of complications

    Rates of complications: incomplete abortion, ongoing pregnancy, surgical intervention, infection requiring treatment, ectopic pregnancy not requiring surgery (Adverse Events) and hospitalisation ≥24 hours, blood transfusion, ectopic pregnancy requiring surgery, deaths (Serious Adverse Events).

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  3. Ectopic pregnancy

    Ectopic pregnancy: time to diagnosis from study inclusion (days,hours)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  4. Ectopic pregnancy

    Ectopic pregnancy: complication such as rupture (yes/no)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  5. Ectopic pregnancy

    Ectopic pregnancy: S-hcg level at diagnosis

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  6. Ectopic pregnancy

    Ectopic pregnancy: treatment (expectant management, medical treatment, surgical treatment)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  7. Gestational age at treatment

    Gestational length at time of initiating treatment (mifepristone intake). Measured in weeks and days (by dates for the Last Menstrual Period (LMP) and ultrasound when available). LMP collected at baseline, date of mifepristone collected at the follow-up survey. Ultrasound dating collected from the endline review of medical records.

    Time frame: LMP collected at baseline. Date of mifepristone collected at the follow-up survey. Ultrasound dating collected from the endline review of medical records (42 days following abortion (mifepristone intake).

  8. Underestimation of gestational age

    Proportion of underestimation (\>10+0 weeks) of gestational age detected on ultrasound (LMP at baseline vs ultrasound findings).

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  9. Severe pain

    Pain defined as Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) \>7

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  10. Bleeding days

    Number of days bleeding (requiring a pad or similar)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  11. Bleeding amount

    Bleeding in relation to menstruation (more/similar or less than a normal menstruation) measured at the follow-up survey.

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  12. Access: time to accessing treatment

    Time to accessing treatment (from inclusion in the study to the pick-up visit/in-clinic visit; days).

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  13. Access: Travel time to access treatment

    Travel time to access abortion medications. Measured in hours and minutes

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  14. Access: Time to initiating treatment

    Time to initiating treatment (from inclusion in the study to mifepristone intake; days)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  15. Postabortion contraceptive use

    Measured in use at follow-up categorised as Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC), Short Acting Reversible Contraception (SARC), barrier methods, natural family planning methods (NPF), sterilization and emergency contraception

    Time frame: 42 days of the medical abortion (mifepristone intake)

  16. Satisfaction with care

    Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Scale (SAPS). The SAPS scale contains 7 questions with 5 response options scored 0-4: very satisfied; satisfied; neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; dissatisfied; very dissatisfied. The questions assess satisfaction with: 1. the effectiveness of treatment 2. information provision 3. technical skills of the healthcare provider 4. involvement in decision-making 5. the patient-provider interaction 6. time with the healthcare provider 7. overall, with the care received

    Time frame: 42 days of the medical abortion (mifepristone intake)

  17. Satisfaction with care

    Overall satisfaction with care using a likert scale

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  18. Satisfaction with care

    Whether the participant would choose the same model of care again in case of wanting another abortion in the future

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  19. Satisfaction with care

    Whether the participant would recommend the model of care received to a friend

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  20. Satisfaction with information

    Satisfaction with information sources using a likert scale (5 options)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

Other outcomes

  1. Testing

    Testing done in-clinic; yes/no; type of tests (ultrasound/pelvic exam/blood-hCG/urine-hCG/STI-testing) and timing (before or after treatment)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  2. Additional contacts

    Number of contacts defined as all contacts: (number of contacts; type of contacts (in-clinic/remote), timing of contacts (before/after treatment) and location (emergency gynaecological department; abortion clinic

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  3. Access: Distance to abortion clinic

    Distance to nearest abortion clinic with emergency care. Calculated using participants postal code and nearest abortion clinic (km)

    Time frame: At baseline (postal code) and 42 days following mifepristone intake (abortion clinic)

  4. Access: Travel time

    Travel time to access medications (hours and minutes)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  5. Main mode of transport

    Main mode of transport (public transport/car/bike/walking)

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone uptake

  6. Productivity loss

    Time off from work as a result of the abortion including attending visits and contacts with healthcare providers, undergoing the abortion.

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

  7. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life will be assessed using the EQ-5D scale. Conversion of scores to Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)

    Time frame: At baselina and 42 days following mifepristone intake

  8. Information sources

    Main information sources used to obtain information about 1) the abortion process and 2) postabortion contraception

    Time frame: 42 days following mifepristone intake

07

Study locations

10 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD Sharing Plan Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publications arising from this study, after de-identification, will be made available. Data shared will include participant-level data necessary to reproduce the published findings. Supporting Information Available Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and data dictionary.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will become available 12 months after publication of the primary study results and remain available for 5 years thereafter.

Access criteria: Access to de-identified participant-level data will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Requests must be accompanied by a detailed research proposal and evidence of appropriate ethical approval where applicable. Data sharing is subject to approval by the sponsor, execution of a data sharing agreement, and compliance with GDPR and Swedish legislation. The study investigators reserve the right to decline requests that are not scientifically justified, are not feasible, conflict with participant consent, or cannot be accommodated within regulatory requirements.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2028, 24 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2026
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 2029
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07868991
Collaborators
Region Stockholm, Region Jämtland Härjedalen, Region Västerbotten, Region Norrbotten, Region Örebro County
Responsible party
Amanda Cleeve (Associate prof, PhD, MSc, RNM, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Amanda Cleeve, PhD, MSc, RNM
Contact
Amanda.cleeve@ki.se
+46737750911
Karin Brandell, PhD, MD
Contact
karin.brandell@ki.se
0769011171
Amanda Cleeve, PhD, MSc, RNM
study chair · Karolinska Institutet
Amanda Cleeve, PhD, MSc, RNM
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet
Karin Brandell, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet
Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet
Margit Endler, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion