ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07867990Updated Oct 9, 2026

The ACT-PrEP Study

An interventional study of POC STI testing, CBC, and partner self-testing to improve PrEP uptake and persistence among pregnant and postpartum women. and Standard of Care in HIV, PrEP and Acceptability, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

AIM: To evaluate the integration of point-of-care etiological STI testing, cognitive behavioral counselling (CBC), and sexual partner engagement strategies to improve STI management, PrEP uptake and 3-month PrEP persistence among pregnant and postpartum women PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the intervention on 3-month PrEP persistence among pregnant and postpartum women (PPW) SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: Determine the proportion of PPW initiating PrEP Determine the prevalence of STIs among pregnant and postpartum women Determine the feasibility and acceptability of aetiological STI testing within the antenatal and postnatal clinical workflows by HCPs Determine the acceptability and uptake of HIV/STI services by partners of pregnant and postpartum women STUDY DESIGN AND POPULATION: One-site, two-arm, individually randomized controlled type-1 hybrid implementation pilot This pilot study will follow a type-1 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design to be implemented at a public sector primary healthcare centre with a high HIV/STI burden (Gugulethu Community Health Centre).

Enrollment: 120 pregnant women attending a routine care visit. Follow-up visits may fall in the post-partum period depending on age of gestation upon enrollment. Inclusion criteria include: 1) age ≥18 years; 2) HIV-negative, 3) minimum gestational age of 18 weeks for pregnant women, and 4) eligible for PrEP as per South African guidelines. Exclusion criteria include: 1) inability to provide informed consent, 2) medical contraindications to PrEP. Sexual partners of PPW will be engaged through the distribution of HIV/syphilis self-test kits, and 10 healthcare providers will participate in cognitive behavioral counselling (CBC) training and competency assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV
  • PrEP
  • Acceptability
  • Appropriateness
  • Feasibility
  • Implementation Science
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,167 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 94 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥18 years;
  • HIV-negative,
  • minimum gestational age of 18 weeks for pregnant women, and
  • eligible for PrEP as per South African guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to provide informed consent,
  • medical contraindications to PrEP.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention Arm

    Behavioral: POC STI testing, CBC, and partner self-testing to improve PrEP uptake and persistence among pregnant and postpartum women.

  • Active comparator
    Control Arm

    Standard of Care

    Other: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralPOC STI testing, CBC, and partner self-testing to improve PrEP uptake and persistence among pregnant and postpartum women.

    2\. Study Aim and Objectives 2.1. Overall Aim To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a multi-component intervention integrating POC STI testing, CBC, and partner self-testing to improve PrEP uptake and persistence among pregnant and postpartum women. 2.2. Primary Objective To evaluate the effect of the multi-component intervention on 3-month PrEP persistence among pregnant and postpartum women. PrEP persistence will be defined as current PrEP use at the 3-month follow-up visit (measured from enrolment), with participants who do not initiate or who discontinue PrEP classified as not persistent. 2.3. Secondary Objectives * To determine the prevalence of STIs among pregnant and postpartum women * To determine the feasibility and acceptability of aetiological STI testing within the antenatal and postnatal clinical workflows by HCPs ● To determine the acceptability and uptake of HIV/STI services by partners of pregnant and postpartum women

  • OtherStandard of Care

    Standard of Care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Implementation outcomes will include feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the intervention

    Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness data tool, this is one tool that assesses the intervention using a Likert scale: 1) completely disagree, 2) disagree, 3) neutral, 4) Agree, 5) completely agree.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. 3-month PrEP persistence

    PrEP initiation

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No sharing of IPD is planned for this Pilot Study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 1 month later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 1, 2026
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07867990
Responsible party
Nicole Montanez (Principle Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Oct 2, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Nicole A Montañez, MSW
Contact
nmontanez@ucla.edu
3108255047
Dvora Joseph Davey, PhD
Contact
dvoradavey@g.ucla.edu
3107942555

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion