CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07841561Updated Sep 25, 2026

Exercise Intensity and Circulating CD34+ Progenitor Cell Mobilization in Trained Adults

An interventional study of Higher-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise and Lower-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise in Exercise-Induced Circulating Progenitor Cell Mobilization, sponsored by Samarra University. Completed at 1 site in Iraq. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Samarra University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This randomized crossover study investigated whether exercise intensity influences the mobilization of circulating CD34+ progenitor cells when total external work is matched. Forty trained male endurance athletes completed two cycling exercise conditions in randomized order: a higher-intensity condition at 70% of peak work rate (WRpeak) and a lower-intensity condition at 30% WRpeak. Both conditions were performed until 250 kJ of external work had been completed and were separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Venous blood samples were obtained before exercise, immediately after exercise, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes of recovery. The primary outcome was the absolute concentration of viable circulating CD34+ cells measured using single-platform flow cytometry. Secondary outcomes included CD34+CD45dim, CD34+CD133+, and CD34+VEGFR2+ cell phenotypes, together with adrenergic, metabolic, chemokine, growth-factor, and cardiovascular responses. The study was designed to determine whether exercise intensity produces distinct progenitor-cell mobilization responses despite identical external work.

Read the detailed description

Acute exercise can transiently alter the number of circulating hematopoietic and vascular-associated progenitor cells. However, exercise intensity and total exercise work are often changed simultaneously, making it difficult to determine whether mobilization is attributable specifically to exercise intensity or simply to a greater amount of external work.

This study used a randomized, counterbalanced, work-matched crossover design to isolate the effect of exercise intensity. Forty trained male endurance athletes completed two cycle-ergometer exercise conditions. In the higher-intensity condition, participants exercised at 70% of their individual peak work rate (WRpeak), whereas in the lower-intensity condition they exercised at 30% WRpeak. Both exercise bouts were terminated when exactly 250 kJ of external mechanical work had been completed. The two experimental sessions were separated by a washout period of at least 7 days.

Participants were assigned to one of two intervention sequences, with either the 70% WRpeak condition or the 30% WRpeak condition performed first. Venous blood samples were collected before exercise (baseline), immediately after exercise, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes after exercise.

The primary outcome was the absolute concentration of viable circulating CD34+ progenitor cells, quantified by single-platform flow cytometry using counting beads. Additional cellular outcomes included CD34+CD45dim, CD34+CD133+, and CD34+VEGFR2+ phenotypes. Circulating epinephrine, norepinephrine, lactate, glucose, CXCL12/SDF-1, VEGF-A, and other prespecified biochemical markers were assessed alongside heart rate and blood pressure responses.

The principal objective was to compare the temporal pattern and magnitude of circulating CD34+ progenitor-cell mobilization between the two exercise-intensity conditions while holding external work constant. Secondary analyses examined whether differences in progenitor-cell mobilization were associated with exercise-induced adrenergic, metabolic, chemokine, growth-factor, and hemodynamic responses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Exercise-Induced Circulating Progenitor Cell Mobilization

Keywords

  • Exercise Intensity
  • CD34+ Progenitor Cells
  • Circulating Progenitor Cells
  • Endurance Athletes
  • Crossover Study
  • Adrenergic Response
  • CXCL12
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Eligible participants were healthy adult male endurance-trained athletes engaged in cycling and/or triathlon, within the prespecified age range, with a regular history of endurance training before enrollment. Participants were required to be medically fit to complete maximal exercise testing and both experimental cycling sessions, able to comply with the crossover design and washout requirements, and willing to provide written informed consent before participation.

-

Exclusion Criteria:Participants were excluded if they had known cardiovascular, metabolic, hematological, inflammatory, or other medical conditions that could affect exercise responses or participant safety; an acute illness, infection, or musculoskeletal injury at the time of testing; use of medications or substances known to substantially influence cardiovascular, adrenergic, metabolic, or hematological responses; inability to complete the exercise-testing protocol or either experimental session; or failure to comply with the required pre-test or washout procedures.

-

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sequence AB: 70% WRpeak Then 30% WRpeak

    Participants first completed a cycling exercise bout at 70% of individual peak work rate (WRpeak) until 250 kJ of external work was achieved. After a washout period of at least 7 days, participants completed a second cycling bout at 30% WRpeak, also matched to 250 kJ of external work.

    Behavioral: Higher-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise · Behavioral: Lower-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise

  • Experimental
    Sequence BA: 30% WRpeak Then 70% WRpeak

    Participants first completed a cycling exercise bout at 30% of individual peak work rate (WRpeak) until 250 kJ of external work was achieved. After a washout period of at least 7 days, participants completed a second cycling bout at 70% WRpeak, also matched to 250 kJ of external work.

    Behavioral: Higher-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise · Behavioral: Lower-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralHigher-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise

    Participants performed cycle-ergometer exercise at 70% of individual peak work rate (WRpeak) until a total external mechanical work of 250 kJ was completed. Venous blood samples were obtained before exercise, immediately after exercise, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes of recovery.

  • BehavioralLower-Intensity Work-Matched Cycling Exercise

    Participants performed cycle-ergometer exercise at 30% of individual peak work rate (WRpeak) until a total external mechanical work of 250 kJ was completed. Venous blood samples were obtained before exercise, immediately after exercise, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes of recovery.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Absolute Circulating Viable CD34+ Progenitor Cell Concentration

    Absolute circulating viable CD34+ progenitor cells were quantified in peripheral blood using single-platform flow cytometry with counting beads and expressed as cells/µL. Measurements were obtained before exercise and during recovery after each exercise condition. Change from baseline was calculated for each post-exercise time point and compared between the 70% WRpeak and 30% WRpeak work-matched exercise conditions.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-exercise, and 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise during each intervention session.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Circulating CD34+CD45dim Progenitor Cell Concentration

    Circulating CD34+CD45dim progenitor cells were quantified in peripheral blood using flow cytometry and expressed as cells/µL. Measurements were obtained before exercise, immediately after exercise, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes of recovery during both exercise conditions. Change from baseline was calculated for each post-exercise time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-exercise, and 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise during each intervention session.

  2. Change From Baseline in Circulating CD34+CD133+ Progenitor Cell Concentration

    Circulating CD34+CD133+ progenitor cells were quantified in peripheral blood using flow cytometry and expressed as cells/µL. Measurements were obtained before exercise, immediately after exercise, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes of recovery during both exercise conditions. Change from baseline was calculated for each post-exercise time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-exercise, and 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise during each intervention session.

  3. Change From Baseline in Circulating CD34+VEGFR2+ Progenitor Cell Concentration

    Circulating CD34+VEGFR2+ cells, representing a putative angiogenic progenitor-cell phenotype, were quantified in peripheral blood using flow cytometry and expressed as cells/µL. Measurements were obtained before exercise, immediately after exercise, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes of recovery during both exercise conditions. Change from baseline was calculated for each post-exercise time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-exercise, and 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise during each intervention session.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Samarra
    Samarra, Muhafazat Salah ad Din 34010, Iraq
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article may be shared upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07841561
Lead sponsor
Samarra University
Responsible party
Saif Rasheed Ghanim (Assistant Professor, Samarra University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Aug 3, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 9, 2026
Completion
Sep 9, 2026
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

SAIF RASHEED GHANIM, PhD
principal investigator · College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Samarra

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion