ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07839468Updated Sep 24, 2026

Patients´ Experiences of Calorimetry Measurements

An observational study in Experiences, Burn and Calorimetry, Indirect, sponsored by Uppsala University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Uppsala University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A severe burn injury affects not only the skin but also how the body uses energy. Many patients have increased energy needs during recovery, and healthcare professionals use a method called indirect calorimetry to measure the body's energy expenditure and help provide appropriate nutritional treatment.

During the measurement, the patient rests comfortably while wearing a transparent canopy over the head for approximately 10 to 30 minutes. The equipment measures oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production to estimate the body's energy needs.

Although indirect calorimetry is commonly used in burn care, little is known about how patients experience the procedure. The aim of this study is to explore patients' experiences of undergoing indirect calorimetry after a burn injury.

Participants will be interviewed about their experiences of the measurement. By analyzing these interviews, we hope to gain a better understanding of patients' perspectives and identify ways to improve information, preparation, comfort, and overall care related to the procedure. Ultimately, this may help make the assessment more comfortable for patients and support high-quality individualized nutritional treatment.

Read the detailed description

Severe burn injury affects the entire body, not only the skin. Profound alterations occur in metabolism, endocrine function, and immune responses, resulting in a hypermetabolic state. This condition is characterized by an increased energy expenditure that may persist for months or even years following injury. Adequate nutritional support is essential to promote wound healing, reduce the risk of infection, and preserve lean body mass. Both underfeeding and overfeeding may adversely affect recovery and clinical outcomes.

To enable safe and individualized nutritional management, measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) using indirect calorimetry is recommended. During the assessment, the awake patient wears a transparent plastic canopy placed over the head. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production are measured over a period of 10 to 30 minutes to estimate energy requirements. Accurate measurements require the patient to remain still, relaxed, and awake, while refraining from speaking, as physical activity, psychological stress, and other disturbances may influence the results.

Although indirect calorimetry is routinely used in burn care, relatively little is known about how patients experience the measurement procedure itself. Factors such as the hospital environment, pain, anxiety, restricted mobility, and the measurement may influence the patient's experience; however, these aspects have received limited scientific attention. Understanding the patient perspective is important, as discomfort or stress may negatively affect both the patient experience and the quality of the measurement.

The aim of this study is therefore to explore how individuals receiving care for burn injuries experience the assessment of resting energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry.

Data will be collected through semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants will be approached during their burn care admission and provided with both oral and written study information. Written informed consent will be obtained prior to participation. Consent forms and interview data will be stored securely and will be accessible only to the research team.

Interviews will be conducted within two weeks of the indirect calorimetry assessment, either in person at the burn unit or remotely via telephone or video call following hospital discharge. All interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interview guide focuses on participants' experiences before, during, and after the indirect calorimetry measurement.

Data will be analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis. Interview transcripts will be read repeatedly to achieve immersion in the data and identify meaning units, which will be condensed, coded, and grouped into subcategories, categories, and overarching themes. Two researchers will independently code the interviews and discuss interpretations until consensus is reached. The analysis will involve an iterative process of moving between the original text, codes, categories, and emerging themes to develop a comprehensive understanding of participants' experiences. Findings will be reported with illustrative quotations to enhance transparency and trustworthiness.

Through qualitative content analysis of interview data, the study seeks to provide an in-depth understanding of patients' experiences, perceptions, and needs associated with indirect calorimetry. Increased knowledge in this area may contribute to improvements in clinical procedures, patient communication, and preparation before and during the assessment. Ultimately, the goal is to make the measurement process as safe, comfortable, and patient-centered as possible, thereby enhancing both the patient experience and the quality of the measurements used to guide individualised nutritional therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Experiences
  • Burn
  • Calorimetry, Indirect

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Experiences
  • Burn
  • Calorimetry, indirect
03

In context

Burns

905 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 64 across 163 observational studies indexed under Burns.

Browse Burns studies →

Lead sponsor

Uppsala University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients post-burn admitted to the BurnCentre at Uppsala university hospital, 18 years or older, swedish/english speaking, with experience of at least one calorimetry measurement.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients post-burn admitted to the BurnCentre at Uppsala university hospital
  • 18 years or older
  • Swedish/english speaking
  • With experience of at least one calorimetry measurement during burn care post-trauma

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fulfilling inclusion criteria
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients post-burn

    Patients post-burn admitted to the BurnCentre at Uppsala university hospital, 18 years or older, swedish/english speaking, with experience of at least one calorimetry measurement.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients´ experiences

    Patients´ experiences before, during and after calorimetry measurement is explored with a semi-structered interview guide. The interview will be conducted within two weeks from the measurment at the Burn Centre. The interviews will be recorded, transcribed and analysed with content analysis.

    Time frame: The interviews will be conducted within two weeks from the calorimetry measurment.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. PubMed 14769454 ↗
  • Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. PubMed 18352969 ↗
  • Oshima T, Berger MM, De Waele E, Guttormsen AB, Heidegger CP, Hiesmayr M, Singer P, Wernerman J, Pichard C. Indirect calorimetry in nutritional therapy. A position paper by the ICALIC study group. Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;36(3):651-662. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PubMed 27373497 ↗
  • Compher C, Bingham AL, McCall M, Patel J, Rice TW, Braunschweig C, McKeever L. Guidelines for the provision of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Jan;46(1):12-41. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2267. Epub 2022 Jan 3. PubMed 34784064 ↗
  • Rousseau AF, Losser MR, Ichai C, Berger MM. ESPEN endorsed recommendations: nutritional therapy in major burns. Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;32(4):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Mar 14. PubMed 23582468 ↗
  • Caldis-Coutris N, Gawaziuk JP, Magnusson S, Logsetty S. Malnutrition in Burns: A Prospective, Single-Center Study. J Burn Care Res. 2022 May 17;43(3):592-595. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab186. PubMed 34653246 ↗
  • Lengele L, Bruyere O, Fadeur M, Verbrugge AM, Martin F, Hans N, Misset B, Rousseau AF. Should We Worry About Nutrition Of Adults With Minor Burns? An Audit Of Their Intakes. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2021 Jun 30;34(2):163-169. PubMed 34584505 ↗
  • Chourdakis M, Bouras E, Shields BA, Stoppe C, Rousseau AF, Heyland DK. Nutritional therapy among burn injured patients in the critical care setting: An international multicenter observational study on "best achievable" practices. Clin Nutr. 2020 Dec;39(12):3813-3820. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 21. PubMed 32336526 ↗
  • Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, Hiesmayr M, Mayer K, Montejo JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, van Zanten ARH, Oczkowski S, Szczeklik W, Bischoff SC. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):48-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29. PubMed 30348463 ↗
  • Berger MM, Reintam-Blaser A, Calder PC, Casaer M, Hiesmayr MJ, Mayer K, Montejo JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, van Zanten ARH, Bischoff SC, Singer P. Monitoring nutrition in the ICU. Clin Nutr. 2019 Apr;38(2):584-593. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 20. PubMed 30077342 ↗
  • Singer P. Preserving the quality of life: nutrition in the ICU. Crit Care. 2019 Jun 14;23(Suppl 1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2415-8. PubMed 31200741 ↗
  • Jeschke MG. Postburn Hypermetabolism: Past, Present, and Future. J Burn Care Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):86-96. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000265. PubMed 26132047 ↗
  • Wise AK, Hromatka KA, Miller KR. Energy Expenditure and Protein Requirements Following Burn Injury. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;34(5):673-680. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10390. Epub 2019 Aug 16. PubMed 31418486 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07839468
Lead sponsor
Uppsala University Hospital
Responsible party
Josefin Dimander (PhD, registered dietitian, Uppsala University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Josefin Dimander, PhD, PhD
Contact
josefin.dimander@uu.se
+(46)0186170489
Anna Stenson Zerpe, PhD, PhD
Contact
anna.zerpe@uu.se
+46(0)186119466

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion