CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07838844IASTM-HTUpdated Sep 24, 2026

IASTM vs. Static Stretching for Hamstring Tightness: Short- and Long-Term Effects

An interventional study of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Static Stretching in Hamstring Tightness, sponsored by GÖKHAN MARAŞ. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by GÖKHAN MARAŞ · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares two treatments for people with tight hamstring muscles (the muscles at the back of the thigh): instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and static stretching. Both are commonly used by physical therapists to improve flexibility, but few studies have looked at their effects beyond a few days after treatment ends.

Forty-six adults with hamstring tightness will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive IASTM, and the other will receive static stretching. Both treatments will be given 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total).

Researchers will measure flexibility (knee extension range of motion), pressure pain threshold, and physical performance (vertical jump and single-leg hop distance) at three time points: before treatment, 3 days after the last session, and 8 weeks after treatment ends. The goal is to find out which treatment provides better short-term and longer-term benefits.

Read the detailed description

Hamstring muscle tightness is a common musculoskeletal condition that can limit hip and knee range of motion, reduce athletic and functional performance, and contribute to other conditions such as patellofemoral pain, patellar tendinopathy, and low back pain. Static stretching has long been used to address hamstring tightness, with systematic reviews suggesting that 6-8 weeks of regular stretching can produce lasting flexibility gains. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) has more recently emerged as an alternative technique, with proposed mechanisms including controlled microtrauma that stimulates an inflammatory response and collagen remodeling in soft tissue.

Most existing studies comparing static stretching and IASTM for hamstring tightness have examined only single-session or short-term (immediate post-treatment) effects. Long-term follow-up data (≥8 weeks) are limited, making it difficult to determine whether treatment-related gains in flexibility, pain sensitivity, and functional performance are sustained over time.

This randomized controlled trial will enroll 46 participants with hamstring tightness, defined as hip flexion range of motion \<65° on the Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test with no neurological signs. Participants will be randomly allocated (computer-generated randomization) to one of two equal groups (n=23 each):

Group 1 (IASTM): Participants will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization applied to the hamstring muscle group using a stainless-steel instrument, scanning technique, distal-to-proximal direction, for 5 minutes per session.

Group 2 (Static Stretching): Participants will receive manual static stretching of the hamstring muscle group, performed in 5 repetitions of 30 seconds of stretch followed by 30 seconds of rest (5 minutes total per session).

Both interventions will be delivered 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total) by a physical therapist with over 10 years of clinical experience in orthopedic rehabilitation and manual therapy.

Outcome assessments will be performed by a blinded assessor independent of treatment delivery, at three time points: baseline (pre-treatment), short-term (3 days after the final session), and long-term (8 weeks after intervention completion). Outcome measures include:

  • Flexibility: knee extension range of motion during 90° hip flexion, measured with a digital inclinometer
  • Pressure pain threshold: measured with a digital algometer over the hamstring muscle bellies (biceps femoris, semitendinosus, semimembranosus)
  • Functional performance: vertical jump height and single-leg hop distance

Statistical analysis will include two-way repeated-measures ANOVA to assess time and group-by-time interaction effects, with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparisons where appropriate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hamstring Tightness

Keywords

  • Hamstring Tightness
  • Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization
  • IASTM
  • Static Stretching
  • Flexibility
  • Pressure Pain Threshold
  • Range of Motion
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Hamstring tightness, defined as hip flexion range of motion \<65° on the Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test, without neurological signs
  • No diagnosed chronic musculoskeletal or systemic disease
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous trauma or surgical operation involving the lower extremity
  • Neurological symptoms radiating to one or both lower extremities due to hamstring injury, spinal pathology, or sciatic nerve involvement
  • Ankle instability
  • Pregnancy
  • Neurological signs elicited during the Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test
  • Hyperalgesia, hematoma, varicose veins, or active skin infection in the lower extremity
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
46 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IASTM

    Participants will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) applied to the hamstring muscle group using a stainless-steel instrument in a scanning technique, distal-to-proximal direction, for 5 minutes per session, 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total).

    Other: Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization

  • Active comparator
    Static Stretching

    Participants will receive manual static stretching of the hamstring muscle group, performed in 5 repetitions of 30 seconds of stretch followed by 30 seconds of rest (5 minutes total per session), 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total).

    Other: Static Stretching

Interventions

  • OtherInstrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization

    Participants will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) applied to the hamstring muscle group using a stainless-steel instrument in a scanning technique, distal-to-proximal direction, for 5 minutes per session, 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total).

  • OtherStatic Stretching

    Participants will receive manual static stretching of the hamstring muscle group, performed in 5 repetitions of 30 seconds of stretch followed by 30 seconds of rest (5 minutes total per session), 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Knee Extension Range of Motion (Flexibility)

    Knee extension range of motion during 90° hip flexion, measured with a digital inclinometer, as an indicator of hamstring flexibility.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 days after final session (short-term), and 8 weeks after intervention completion (long-term)

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07838844
Lead sponsor
GÖKHAN MARAŞ
Responsible party
GÖKHAN MARAŞ (Selcuk University, Gazi University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion