ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07837960CDCPUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Exploration of Diagnosis, Etiology, and Prognosis Prediction of Cracked Teeth in Young Adults

An observational study in Cracked Tooth Syndrome, sponsored by Fujian Medical University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Fujian Medical University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
161
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cracked teeth are a common dental problem where tiny cracks form in the teeth. These cracks can be hard to find early, and if not treated, they may cause the tooth to break. This study aims to see if a new, non-invasive imaging method called Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) can help us find these cracks better in young adults aged 18 to 30 years. Participants will attend a single dental visit where they will receive a standard dental examination, including checks for pain when biting or when the tooth is tapped or exposed to cold. Additionally, pictures of their teeth will be taken using a special NIRI camera that uses a safe, painless light, and their teeth will be examined closely using a dental operating microscope, which is the current standard method for comparison. The main goals are to evaluate how accurate the NIRI method is compared to the microscope, to determine if NIRI can serve as a reliable alternative or helpful supplement for dentists, and to identify patterns and factors such as tooth position, wear, and bite that may be linked to cracked teeth, helping dentists recognize patients at higher risk. The study enrolled participants from September 2025 to March 2026 at the School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University.

Read the detailed description

The diagnosis of cracked teeth relies heavily on subjective clinical findings, including patient-reported pain upon biting, cold sensitivity, and visual inspection under magnification. However, these methods lack objective quantifiable measures, often leading to delayed or missed diagnoses. Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) has emerged as a promising non-invasive imaging modality that can detect subtle structural changes in tooth hard tissues. This study is designed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic utility of NIRI in detecting cracked teeth among young adults, using the dental operating microscope (OM) combined with clinical examination as the reference standard. This study was designed as a prospective, self-controlled, diagnostic accuracy trial. All participants underwent both diagnostic examinations: the index test was near-infrared imaging (NIRI) and the reference standard was operating microscope (OM) combined with conventional clinical examination.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cracked Tooth Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cracked teeth
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • near-infrared imaging
  • young adults
  • dental operating microscope
  • tooth wear
  • occlusion
03

In context

Tooth Wear

62 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth Wear; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 161 is above the median of 71 across 21 observational studies indexed under Tooth Wear.

Browse Tooth Wear studies →

Lead sponsor

Fujian Medical University is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study enrolled volunteer students aged 18 to 30 years from Fujian Medical University, recruited via on-site presentations during class meetings between September 2025 and March 2026. A total of 161 participants were included in the final analysis. The study population included both males and females, with no restriction on gender. Healthy volunteers were accepted as long as they met the inclusion criteria.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18 to 30 years old Presence of ≥20 natural teeth that are either unrestored or have minor restorations Willingness to provide written Capability to cooperate with clinical oral examination and NIRI scanning

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Presence of \<20 natural teeth History of radiotherapy or surgery in the maxillofacial region Inability to cooperate with clinical examinations or questionnaire surveys History of facial trauma Undergoing orthodontic treatment

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
161 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Young Adult Study Cohort

    This group includes young adults aged 18 to 30 years who are enrolled in this diagnostic study. All participants will undergo a comprehensive baseline oral examination, including assessment of occlusion, tooth wear, restoration status, and clinical symptoms such as biting pain, cold-stimulus pain, and percussion pain. Each participant's teeth will be examined sequentially using Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) and a dental operating microscope (OM), with examiners blinded to each other's results. No intervention is administered; all assessments are observational and non-invasive.

    Other: Observational Assessment Only

Interventions

  • OtherObservational Assessment Only

    This is an observational diagnostic study with no therapeutic intervention administered. Participants undergo a single baseline oral examination, including clinical assessment of occlusion, tooth wear, restoration status, and symptoms (biting pain, cold-stimulus pain, percussion pain), followed by two diagnostic imaging procedures: Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) and operating microscope (OM) examination. All procedures are non-invasive and performed for diagnostic data collection purposes only. No drug, device, or therapeutic procedure is administered as part of the study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of NIRI for Detecting Cracked Teeth

    Sensitivity and specificity of Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) for detecting cracked teeth, using dental operating microscope (OM) examination as the reference standard. Calculated at both the tooth level and the patient level with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  2. Positive and Negative Predictive Values of NIRI for Detecting Cracked Teeth

    Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) for detecting cracked teeth, using dental operating microscope (OM) examination as the reference standard. Calculated at both the tooth level and the patient level with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  3. Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of NIRI for Detecting Cracked Teeth

    Overall discriminative ability of Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with 95% confidence intervals at both the tooth and patient levels.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Agreement Between NIRI and Operating Microscope(OM)

    Cohen's Kappa statistic evaluating the inter-method agreement between Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) and operating microscope (OM) examination for cracked tooth diagnosis.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  2. Patient-Level Prevalence of Cracked Teeth

    Proportion of participants classified as crack-positive by operating microscope (OM) examination, reported as a descriptive prevalence estimate in the study population.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  3. Crack Status and NIRI Diagnostic Performance by Tooth Position

    Proportion of teeth classified as crack-positive by operating microscope (OM) examination, reported separately for anterior teeth, premolars, and molars as percentages of examined teeth in each tooth position category. Subgroup analyses of the primary outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC with 95% CIs) are reported separately for each tooth position, using OM as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  4. Crack Status and NIRI Diagnostic Performance by Tooth Wear

    Proportion of teeth classified as crack-positive by OM examination, reported for teeth with versus without wear based on the Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Index (grades 0-4). Subgroup analyses of the primary outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC with 95% CIs) are reported by wear grade, using OM as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  5. Crack Status and NIRI Diagnostic Performance by Clinical Symptoms

    Proportion of teeth classified as crack-positive by OM examination, reported separately for each clinical symptom (tenderness to percussion, pain on biting, and positive cold test). Subgroup analyses of the primary outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC with 95% CIs) are reported separately for teeth with versus without each symptom, using OM as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  6. Crack Status and NIRI Diagnostic Performance by Caries and Restoration Status

    Proportion of teeth classified as crack-positive by OM examination, reported separately by caries status, filling status, and prosthetic restoration status. Subgroup analyses of the primary outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC with 95% CIs) are reported separately for each condition, using OM as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  7. Crack Status and NIRI Diagnostic Performance by Special Dental Conditions

    Proportion of teeth classified as crack-positive by OM examination, reported separately for each special dental condition (enamel hypoplasia, lateral displacement, joint clicking, central cusp deformity, and fused tooth). Subgroup analyses of the primary outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC with 95% CIs) are reported separately for each condition, using OM as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  8. Patient-Level Crack Status and NIRI Diagnostic Performance by Occlusal Factors

    Proportion of participants classified as crack-positive by OM examination, reported separately by occlusal factors (sex, overbite, overjet, and molar relationship). Subgroup analyses of the primary outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC with 95% CIs) are reported at the patient level, stratified by each occlusal factor, using OM as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

Other outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Percent Agreement Between NIRI and OM

    Positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement between Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) and operating microscope (OM) for cracked tooth detection, with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  2. Patient-Level Prevalence of Cracked Teeth

    Proportion of participants classified as crack-positive by operating microscope (OM) examination, reported as a descriptive prevalence estimate in the study population.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

  3. Prevalence of Clinical Symptoms in Crack-Positive Teeth

    Descriptive prevalence of clinical symptoms (biting pain, cold-stimulus pain, and percussion pain) among crack-positive teeth identified by operating microscope examination.

    Time frame: At baseline upon completion of oral examinations

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fujian Medical University Stomatological Hospital
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hilton TJ, Funkhouser E, Ferracane JL, Gilbert GH, Baltuck C, Benjamin P, Louis D, Mungia R, Meyerowitz C; National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Correlation between symptoms and external characteristics of cracked teeth: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Apr;148(4):246-256.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Feb 2. PubMed 28160942 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data, including demographic information, clinical examination results (tooth position, occlusion, tooth wear, restoration status, and clinical symptoms), and imaging data from Near-Infrared Imaging (NIRI) and operating microscope examinations will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: IPD and supporting information will be available starting 6 months after study completion and will remain accessible for a period of 5 years.

Access criteria: Access to IPD and supporting information will be granted upon reasonable request via email to the Principal Investigator (jia.linghui@fjmu.edu.cn). Requestors will be required to submit a brief research proposal outlining their intended use of the data. Data will be shared for non-commercial research purposes only, and a data use agreement may be required to ensure data confidentiality and appropriate acknowledgment of the original research team.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.big.ac.cn

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2025 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 6 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2026
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
StartActual
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2026
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07837960
Responsible party
Hao Yu (Chief Physician Associate Professor, Fujian Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026
Completion
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion