ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07835620Updated Sep 23, 2026

A Phase 4 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CANIUM Tab. in Acute Bronchitis Patients.

A Phase 4 interventional study of DSP2505(Canium) and Umckamin in Acute Bronchitis, sponsored by Dasan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Completed at 12 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Dasan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Sep 2026).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
223
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compared two oral medicines containing Pelargonium sidoides extract in patients aged 12 to 75 years with acute bronchitis. Participants were randomly assigned to DSP2505 (Ckanium tablets) or Umckamin tablets for 7 days. The main question was whether DSP2505 was no worse than Umckamin by more than a defined margin in improving bronchitis symptoms. Symptoms, cough-related quality of life, overall improvement, satisfaction, and safety were assessed.

Read the detailed description

This phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group non-inferiority trial was conducted at 12 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Eligible patients had acute bronchitis with onset within 48 hours before randomization and a Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS) of at least 5 at screening and baseline. Following a screening period of up to 2 days, participants were randomized 1:1 to DSP2505 or Umckamin for 7 days. Randomization was stratified by baseline BSS (\<8 or >=8). Matching placebos maintained blinding. Assessments were performed at baseline and the Day 7 end-of-treatment visit.

The primary endpoint was change in BSS total score from baseline to Day 7. The clinical study report describes an analysis of covariance with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline BSS as a covariate. Non-inferiority was assessed by comparing the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the adjusted difference (DSP2505 minus Umckamin) with a margin of 1.10 points. The per-protocol set was the primary efficacy analysis population, with a supporting full-analysis-set analysis. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose.

This registration was prepared after study completion and analysis of the results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Bronchitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pelargonium sidoides
  • Non-inferiority
  • Herbal medicine
  • DSP2505
  • BSS
  • COAT
  • Ckanium
  • Umckamin
03

In context

Bronchitis

156 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchitis; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 223 is above the median of 185 across 105 interventional studies indexed under Bronchitis.

Browse Bronchitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dasan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female patients aged 12 to 75 years, inclusive.
  2. Acute bronchitis with onset within 48 hours before randomization and BSS total score >=5 at both screening and randomization.
  3. Females of and males agree to medically acceptable during the trial: ovulation-inhibiting combined hormonal contraception (oral, intravaginal, or transdermal); ovulation-inhibiting progestogen-only contraception (oral, injectable, or implantable); intrauterine device; intrauterine hormone-releasing system; bilateral tubal ligation/salpingectomy; bilateral oophorectomy; vasectomized partner; or sexual abstinence.
  4. Negative pregnancy test before study medication in females of childbearing potential.
  5. Voluntary written after explanation of the study. A legally authorized representative also provides written consent for participants younger than 19 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Body temperature >38.5 degrees Celsius at randomization.
  2. Respiratory disease that could affect efficacy assessment, including pneumonia, bronchial asthma, cystic fibrosis, viral influenza, active tuberculosis, , bronchiectasis, or interstitial lung disease; or suspected pneumonia on chest radiography, auscultation, or vital signs.
  3. Medical history or disease judged to affect the study, including a coagulation disorder, increased bleeding tendency, or abnormal coagulation test at screening; within 5 years (exceptions include completely excised basal/squamous cell carcinoma, radically resected papillary thyroid carcinoma, or successfully treated cervical carcinoma in situ at least 1 year previously; patients considered cured within the previous 5 years with no subsequent treatment or anticipated need for treatment may participate); or hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, or central nervous system disease or disorder.
  4. History of psychiatric illness, alcoholism, or drug abuse.
  5. Hereditary galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption.
  6. Use or planned use of prohibited medication: anticoagulants at screening; systemic antibiotics/antivirals or systemic/inhaled from 2 weeks before randomization through the final visit; ACE inhibitors from 1 week before randomization (4 weeks for perindopril) through the final visit, except stable dosing for an underlying condition; expectorants, mucolytics, antitussives, or herbal antitussive/expectorant products from 2 days before randomization through the final visit; or antihistamines, anticholinergics including bronchodilators, other symptomatic treatments for acute bronchitis, or analgesics throughout the study. Temporary acetaminophen for fever up to 1.5 g/day is permitted, except within 24 hours before Visits 2 and 3.
  7. or AST >3 times the , or estimated \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
  8. History of to study medication ingredients.
  9. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  10. Average smoking of at least 15 cigarettes/day during the preceding 30 days.
  11. Receipt of medication or an investigational device in another trial within 30 days before screening, or current participation in another interventional trial.
  12. Any other reason judged by the investigator to make participation inappropriate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
223 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DSP2505 (Canium)

    DSP2505 (Canium) one tablet plus one matching placebo for Umckamin, orally three times daily for 7 days.

    Drug: DSP2505(Canium) · Drug: Placebo Matching Umckamin

  • Active comparator
    Umckamin

    Umckamin one tablet plus one matching placebo for DSP2505, orally three times daily for 7 days.

    Drug: Umckamin · Drug: Placebo Matching DSP2505 (Canium)

Interventions

  • DrugDSP2505(Canium)

    Canium film-coated tablet containing 20 mg of Pelargonium sidoides 11% ethanol dry extract (5.5-6.6:1). One tablet orally three times daily for 7 days.

  • DrugUmckamin

    Tablet containing 111.111 mg of Pelargonium sidoides 11% ethanol extract (1:8-10) and maltodextrin mixture (1:4.56), equivalent to 20 mg of dried extract. One tablet orally three times daily for 7 days.

  • DrugPlacebo Matching Umckamin

    One matching placebo tablet orally three times daily for 7 days to maintain double-dummy blinding.

  • DrugPlacebo Matching DSP2505 (Canium)

    One matching placebo tablet orally three times daily for 7 days to maintain double-dummy blinding.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS) Total Score at Day 7

    BSS is the sum of five symptom scores: cough, sputum, rales/rhonchi, chest pain during coughing, and dyspnea. Each is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe), giving a total of 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Change is Day 7 minus baseline; a negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in BSS Cough Score at Day 7

    The cough component of BSS is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe). Change is Day 7 minus baseline; a negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  2. Change From Baseline in BSS Sputum Score at Day 7

    The sputum component of BSS is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe). Change is Day 7 minus baseline; a negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  3. Change From Baseline in BSS Rales/Rhonchi Score at Day 7

    The rales/rhonchi component of BSS is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe). Change is Day 7 minus baseline; a negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  4. Change From Baseline in BSS Chest Pain During Coughing Score at Day 7

    The chest pain during coughing component of BSS is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe). Change is Day 7 minus baseline; a negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  5. Change From Baseline in BSS Dyspnea Score at Day 7

    The dyspnea component of BSS is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe). Change is Day 7 minus baseline; a negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  6. Percentage of Participants With BSS Total Score Below 3 at Day 7

    Response defined as BSS total score \<3 at Day 7.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  7. Percentage of Participants With a BSS Total Score Reduction of at Least 7 Points

    Response defined as a reduction in BSS total score of at least 7 points from baseline to Day 7.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  8. Percentage of Participants Meeting Both BSS Response Criteria

    Response defined as both a BSS total score \<3 at Day 7 and a reduction of at least 7 points from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  9. Change From Baseline in Cough Assessment Test (COAT) Total Score at Day 7

    COAT assesses cough frequency, interference with daily activities, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and airway hypersensitivity. Each of five items is scored from 0 to 4, giving a total of 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater cough-related impairment. Change is Day 7 minus baseline; a negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7

  10. Investigator-rated Global Improvement at Day 7

    The Integrative Medicine Outcome Scale (IMOS) rates change relative to baseline: 1=complete recovery, 2=major improvement, 3=slight to moderate improvement, 4=no change, and 5=deterioration. Lower scores indicate greater improvement. The distribution across the five categories is assessed.

    Time frame: Day 7

  11. Percentage of Participants With Investigator-rated Global Improvement at Day 7

    The Integrative Medicine Outcome Scale (IMOS) rates change relative to baseline: 1=complete recovery, 2=major improvement, 3=slight to moderate improvement, 4=no change, and 5=deterioration. Lower scores indicate greater improvement. Improvement is defined as an IMOS rating of 1 or 2 by the investigator.

    Time frame: Day 7

  12. Percentage of Participants With Participant-rated Global Improvement at Day 7

    The Integrative Medicine Outcome Scale (IMOS) rates change relative to baseline: 1=complete recovery, 2=major improvement, 3=slight to moderate improvement, 4=no change, and 5=deterioration. Lower scores indicate greater improvement. Improvement is defined as an IMOS rating of 1 or 2 by the participant.

    Time frame: Day 7

  13. Participant Satisfaction With Treatment at Day 7

    The Integrative Medicine Patient Satisfaction Scale (IMPSS) is a five-category participant rating: 1=very satisfied, 2=satisfied, 3=neutral, 4=dissatisfied, and 5=very dissatisfied. Lower scores indicate greater satisfaction. The distribution across categories is assessed.

    Time frame: Day 7

  14. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

    Participants experiencing adverse events arising after study medication administration, including serious adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and events leading to study discontinuation.

    Time frame: From first dose through the Day 7 end-of-treatment assessment

  15. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Tests

    Clinically significant abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests are assessed by the investigator, including changes from normal or non-clinically significant findings before treatment to clinically significant abnormal findings after treatment.

    Time frame: Screening/before treatment and Day 7

  16. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs are assessed by the investigator, including changes from normal or non-clinically significant findings before treatment to clinically significant abnormal findings after treatment.

    Time frame: Screening/before treatment and Day 7

  17. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination

    Clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination are assessed by the investigator, including changes from normal or non-clinically significant findings before treatment to clinically significant abnormal findings after treatment.

    Time frame: Screening/before treatment and Day 7

  18. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram

    Clinically significant abnormalities in electrocardiogram are assessed by the investigator, including changes from normal or non-clinically significant findings before treatment to clinically significant abnormal findings after treatment.

    Time frame: Screening/before treatment and Day 7

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
    Anyang, South Korea
  • Dong-A University Hospital
    Busan, South Korea
  • Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
    Busan, South Korea
  • Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital
    Chuncheon, South Korea
  • Wonkwang University Hospital
    Iksan, South Korea
  • Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
    Incheon, South Korea
  • Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
    Seoul, South Korea
  • Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
    Seoul, South Korea
  • Konkuk University Medical Center
    Seoul, South Korea
  • Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
    Seoul, South Korea
  • Ulsan University Hospital
    Ulsan, South Korea
  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
    Yangsan, South Korea
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data will not be shared to protect participant confidentiality. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific publications reporting aggregate results.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07835620
Lead sponsor
Dasan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Collaborators
Konkuk University Hospital, Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Wonkwang University Hospital, InjeUniversityBusanPaikHospital, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Ulsan University Hospital, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon St.Mary's Hospital, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Jan 26, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 21, 2026
Completion
Sep 9, 2026
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Kwang Ha Yoo
study chair · Konkuk University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion