ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07835464Updated Sep 25, 2026

STOP-4P for Reducing Anxiety Before Amniocentesis

An interventional study of STOP4P and Informational Video and Supportive Activities in Anxiety, sponsored by Hung Vuong Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Primary conditionAnxiety Disorders(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Hung Vuong Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Sep 25, 2026Interventions changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if STOP-4P can lower anxiety in pregnant women having amniocentesis.

Amniocentesis is a prenatal test. A doctor uses a needle to collect a small amount of fluid around the baby.

The main question this trial aims to answer is: Does STOP-4P lower anxiety compared with other forms of support and routine care?

Researchers will compare three groups: (1) The STOP-4P group will receive routine care, watch a short video about amniocentesis, take part in simple support activities, and practice STOP-4P before the procedure, (2) The control group will receive the same care, video, and support activities but will not practice STOP-4P and (3) The observational group will receive routine care only.

Participants in the STOP-4P and control groups will be assigned at random. Those in the observational group will be enrolled separately without random assignment.

Researchers will also look at well-being, pain, heart rate, and blood pressure.

Participants will: (1) Answer short questions about anxiety and well-being before amniocentesis and 30 minutes after the procedure, (2) Have their heart rate and blood pressure measured before amniocentesis, at the start of the procedure, and 30 minutes afterward, (3) Complete the activities assigned to their study group and (4) Rate the pain they felt during amniocentesis.

After the main study assessments are completed, all participants will be offered access to STOP-4P and may practice it at home if they choose.

About 2 weeks after amniocentesis, the study team will record the test result, any complications, and how often participants practiced STOP-4P at home. Participants can also talk with the study team about psychological or medical concerns if needed.

Read the detailed description

Amniocentesis may cause short-term anxiety because pregnant women may worry about the procedure, possible pain or complications, fetal safety, and uncertainty about the test result. The waiting period before amniocentesis was chosen as the intervention window because these concerns are already present before the procedure. It also gives participants time to receive a brief psychological intervention with minimal disruption to routine clinical care.

At enrollment, participants in all three study groups are stratified according to the clinical indication for amniocentesis. Different diagnoses and indications may be associated with different levels of anxiety before the procedure. Stratification helps control these baseline differences and improves comparability among the groups within each stratum before the next group allocation steps.

The protocol also includes a non-randomized observational comparison group receiving routine care alone. This group is enrolled during separate prespecified study sessions. Including this group helps distinguish the added effect of STOP-4P from the effects of other study-related supportive activities and from routine care alone.

All participants are offered access to STOP-4P after the main post-procedure assessment has been completed. This delayed access allows participants who did not receive STOP-4P before amniocentesis to use it while waiting for the test result, without affecting the main study comparison.

Anxiety and well-being are not reassessed at the two-week follow-up because participants' emotional responses may be strongly influenced by the amniocentesis result, especially if the result is abnormal. The later follow-up therefore focuses on clinical information and the use of STOP-4P rather than on evaluating its main anxiety-reduction effect.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Amniocentesis
  • Psychological intervention
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders Unverified

7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 240 is above the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Hung Vuong Hospital is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women in the second trimester who are scheduled to undergo diagnostic amniocentesis at Hung Vuong Hospital.
  • Able to read and understand Vietnamese, complete the study questionnaires, and follow study instructions.
  • Willing to participate and provide written after receiving a full explanation of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder, such as generalized anxiety disorder, major depression, or schizophrenia.
  • Current use of psychiatric medication or receipt of psychological intervention during the current pregnancy.
  • Unable to understand or complete the study questionnaires because of cognitive limitations.
  • Obstetric emergency at the time of enrollment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    STOP-4P With Video and Supportive Activities

    Participants receive routine care, watch a short informational video about amniocentesis, complete simple supportive activities, and practice the web-based STOP-4P intervention before amniocentesis.

    Behavioral: STOP4P

  • Other
    Video and Supportive Activities Without STOP-4P

    Participants receive routine care, watch the same informational video about amniocentesis, and complete the same supportive activities as the STOP-4P group, but do not practice STOP-4P before amniocentesis.

    Behavioral: Informational Video and Supportive Activities

  • No intervention
    Routine Care Only

    Participants receive routine care only before the main post-procedure assessment and do not receive the study video, supportive activities, or STOP-4P during this period.

Interventions

  • BehavioralSTOP4P

    STOP-4P is a brief, web-based psychological intervention delivered in an interactive, game-like format and completed in about 10 minutes. It includes eight steps: (1) rating the current emotional state on a 1-10 scale; (2) tapping a virtual bell as a cue to stop and pause briefly; (3) practicing slow breathing with a longer exhalation; (4) noticing areas of discomfort or tension in the body, then relaxing the whole body from head to toe; (5) identifying the current emotion by selecting the closest match from six basic emotions; (6) noticing a worrying thought and imagining letting it go; (7) reconnecting with the baby and writing a short loving message to the baby; and (8) rating the emotional state again on the same 1-10 scale. Participants complete STOP-4P while waiting for amniocentesis.

  • BehavioralInformational Video and Supportive Activities

    Participants watch a short informational video explaining the amniocentesis procedure. They then write a wish for their baby to place on the "Wish Tree" and create a card for themselves or their baby. These brief activities are intended to provide information and supportive emotional expression before amniocentesis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in State and Trait Anxiety Scores Before and After Amniocentesis

    Anxiety is assessed using the 10-item short form of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). It includes two five-item subscales: state anxiety (STAIS-5) and trait anxiety (STAIT-5). Each subscale has a score range of 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. Both subscales are scored before amniocentesis and 30 minutes after the procedure. For each subscale, the change is calculated as the score after the procedure minus the score before the procedure. A negative change indicates a decrease in anxiety. Changes in state and trait anxiety scores will be compared separately among the STOP-4P, control, and observational groups.

    Time frame: From the waiting period before amniocentesis to 30 minutes after amniocentesis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Well-being Scores Before and After Amniocentesis

    Well-being is assessed using a one-item measure adapted from the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale. Scores range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater well-being and a more positive emotional state. Scores are measured before amniocentesis and 30 minutes after the procedure and compared among the STOP-4P, control, and observational groups.

    Time frame: During the waiting period before amniocentesis and 30 minutes after amniocentesis.

  2. Pain Intensity After Amniocentesis Measured by the Visual Analog Scale

    Participants rate the pain they experienced during amniocentesis using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate greater perceived pain. Scores will be compared among the STOP-4P, control, and observational groups.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after amniocentesis

  3. Changes in Heart Rate and Blood Pressure at Three Time Points

    Heart rate is measured in beats per minute at three time points: during the waiting period before amniocentesis, when the participant gets onto the procedure table, and 30 minutes after amniocentesis. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure are measured at the same three time points, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) is calculated at each time point. For each participant, two changes are calculated separately for heart rate and blood pressure: the value when the participant gets onto the procedure table minus the value during the waiting period, and the value 30 minutes after amniocentesis minus the value during the waiting period. These changes will be compared among the STOP-4P, control, and observational groups.

    Time frame: During the waiting period before amniocentesis; when the participant gets onto the procedure table; and 30 minutes after amniocentesis.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cantril H. The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press; 1965.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  • Raju NN, Naga Pavan Kumar KSVR, Nihal G. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Anxiety and Panic Disorders in Emergency Setting. Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;65(2):181-185. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_489_22. Epub 2023 Jan 30. No abstract available. PubMed 37063628 ↗
  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available. PubMed 22588748 ↗
  • Đinh Quang Hải, Nguyễn Hoài Bắc. Đặc điểm rối loạn lo âu trên thang điểm STAI-5 ở người bệnh viêm tinh hoàn, mào tinh hoàn điều trị nội trú tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 2024;185(12):121-128. doi:10.52852/tcncyh.v185i12.2818.
  • Zsido AN, Teleki SA, Csokasi K, Rozsa S, Bandi SA. Development of the short version of the spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113223. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113223. Epub 2020 Jun 12. PubMed 32563747 ↗
  • Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
  • Leutenegger V, Grylka-Baeschlin S, Wieber F, Daly D, Pehlke-Milde J. The effectiveness of skilled breathing and relaxation techniques during antenatal education on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05178-w. PubMed 36402944 ↗
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
  • Rooney T, Sharpe L, Todd J, Richmond B, Colagiuri B. The relationship between expectancy, anxiety, and the nocebo effect: a systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for future research. Health Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;17(4):550-577. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2125894. Epub 2022 Oct 7. PubMed 36111435 ↗
  • Corsi N, Colloca L. Placebo and Nocebo Effects: The Advantage of Measuring Expectations and Psychological Factors. Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 6;8:308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00308. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28321201 ↗
  • Woolhouse H, Mercuri K, Judd F, Brown SJ. Antenatal mindfulness intervention to reduce depression, anxiety and stress: a pilot randomised controlled trial of the MindBabyBody program in an Australian tertiary maternity hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 25;14:369. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0369-z. PubMed 25343848 ↗
  • Dhillon A, Sparkes E, Duarte RV. Mindfulness-Based Interventions During Pregnancy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mindfulness (N Y). 2017;8(6):1421-1437. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0726-x. Epub 2017 Apr 17. PubMed 29201244 ↗
  • Tabibnia G, Lieberman MD, Craske MG. The lasting effect of words on feelings: words may facilitate exposure effects to threatening images. Emotion. 2008 Jun;8(3):307-17. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.307. PubMed 18540747 ↗
  • Lieberman MD, Inagaki TK, Tabibnia G, Crockett MJ. Subjective responses to emotional stimuli during labeling, reappraisal, and distraction. Emotion. 2011 Jun;11(3):468-80. doi: 10.1037/a0023503. PubMed 21534661 ↗
  • Siegel DJ. Mindsight: the new science of personal transformation. New York: Bantam Books; 2010.
  • Lieberman MD, Eisenberger NI, Crockett MJ, Tom SM, Pfeifer JH, Way BM. Putting feelings into words: affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):421-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x. PubMed 17576282 ↗
  • Hariri AR, Bookheimer SY, Mazziotta JC. Modulating emotional responses: effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system. Neuroreport. 2000 Jan 17;11(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00009. PubMed 10683827 ↗
  • Ozkan SA, Rathfisch G. The effect of relaxation exercises on sleep quality in pregnant women in the third trimester: A randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;32:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 26. PubMed 30057064 ↗
  • Ventura T, Gomes MC, Carreira T. Cortisol and anxiety response to a relaxing intervention on pregnant women awaiting amniocentesis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Jan;37(1):148-56. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 25. PubMed 21705148 ↗
  • Wang S, Zhang C, Sun M, Zhang D, Luo Y, Liang K, Xu T, Pan X, Zheng R, Shangguan F, Wang J. Effectiveness of mindfulness training on pregnancy stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in women in China: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1073494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073494. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36935954 ↗
  • Gee DG, Gabard-Durnam L, Telzer EH, Humphreys KL, Goff B, Shapiro M, Flannery J, Lumian DS, Fareri DS, Caldera C, Tottenham N. Maternal buffering of human amygdala-prefrontal circuitry during childhood but not during adolescence. Psychol Sci. 2014 Nov;25(11):2067-78. doi: 10.1177/0956797614550878. Epub 2014 Oct 3. PubMed 25280904 ↗
  • Jerath R, Crawford MW, Barnes VA, Harden K. Self-regulation of breathing as a primary treatment for anxiety. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015 Jun;40(2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/s10484-015-9279-8. PubMed 25869930 ↗
  • Critchley HD, Garfinkel SN. Interoception and emotion. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Oct;17:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Apr 23. PubMed 28950976 ↗
  • Lehrer PM, Gevirtz R. Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work? Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 21;5:756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25101026 ↗
  • Laborde S, Allen MS, Borges U, Dosseville F, Hosang TJ, Iskra M, Mosley E, Salvotti C, Spolverato L, Zammit N, Javelle F. Effects of voluntary slow breathing on heart rate and heart rate variability: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jul;138:104711. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104711. Epub 2022 May 24. PubMed 35623448 ↗
  • Russo MA, Santarelli DM, O'Rourke D. The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human. Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Dec;13(4):298-309. doi: 10.1183/20734735.009817. PubMed 29209423 ↗
  • Hamdani SU, Zill-E-Huma, Zafar SW, Suleman N, Um-Ul-Baneen, Waqas A, Rahman A. Effectiveness of relaxation techniques 'as an active ingredient of psychological interventions' to reduce distress, anxiety and depression in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Jun 28;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00541-y. PubMed 35765083 ↗
  • Jorm AF, Morgan AJ, Hetrick SE. Relaxation for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD007142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007142.pub2. PubMed 18843744 ↗
  • Manzoni GM, Pagnini F, Castelnuovo G, Molinari E. Relaxation training for anxiety: a ten-years systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 2;8:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-41. PubMed 18518981 ↗
  • Volpato E, Banfi P, Nicolini A, Pagnini F. A quick relaxation exercise for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: explorative randomized controlled trial. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2018 May 2;13:13. doi: 10.1186/s40248-018-0124-9. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29744054 ↗
  • Dawson MA, Hamson-Utley JJ, Hansen R, Olpin M. Examining the effectiveness of psychological strategies on physiologic markers: evidence-based suggestions for holistic care of the athlete. J Athl Train. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):331-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.09. Epub 2014 Feb 3. PubMed 24490842 ↗
  • Norelli SK, Long A, Krepps JM. Relaxation Techniques. 2023 Aug 28. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513238/ PubMed 30020610 ↗
  • Qian J, Sun S, Wang M, Sun X, Yu X. Art-based interventions for women's mental health in pregnancy and postpartum: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 15;14:1112951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1112951. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36873226 ↗
  • Strang CE. Art therapy and neuroscience: evidence, limits, and myths. Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1484481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1484481. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39417019 ↗
  • Stuckey HL, Nobel J. The connection between art, healing, and public health: a review of current literature. Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):254-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156497. Epub 2009 Dec 17. PubMed 20019311 ↗
  • Daykin N, Gray K, McCree M, Willis J. Creative and credible evaluation for arts, health and well-being: opportunities and challenges of co-production. Arts Health. 2017;9(2):123-138. doi:10.1080/17533015.2016.1206948.
  • Rieck J, Wrobel J, Porras AR, McRae K, Gowin JL. Neural signatures of emotion regulation. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1775. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52203-3. PubMed 38245590 ↗
  • Messina I, Grecucci A, Viviani R. Neurobiological models of emotion regulation: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of acceptance as an emotion regulation strategy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):257-267. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab007. PubMed 33475715 ↗
  • Morawetz C, Hemetsberger FJ, Laird AR, Kohn N. Emotion regulation: From neural circuits to a transdiagnostic perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Jan;168:105960. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105960. Epub 2024 Nov 28. PubMed 39615712 ↗
  • Etkin A, Buchel C, Gross JJ. The neural bases of emotion regulation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Nov;16(11):693-700. doi: 10.1038/nrn4044. PubMed 26481098 ↗
  • Heller AS, Bagot RC. Is Hippocampal Replay a Mechanism for Anxiety and Depression? JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 1;77(4):431-432. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4788. No abstract available. PubMed 32022841 ↗
  • Liu WZ, Zhang WH, Zheng ZH, Zou JX, Liu XX, Huang SH, You WJ, He Y, Zhang JY, Wang XD, Pan BX. Identification of a prefrontal cortex-to-amygdala pathway for chronic stress-induced anxiety. Nat Commun. 2020 May 6;11(1):2221. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15920-7. PubMed 32376858 ↗
  • Luo Q, Li X, Zhao J, Jiang Q, Wei D. The effect of slow breathing in regulating anxiety. Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 11;15(1):8417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92017-5. PubMed 40069274 ↗
  • Magnon V, Dutheil F, Vallet GT. Benefits from one session of deep and slow breathing on vagal tone and anxiety in young and older adults. Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 29;11(1):19267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98736-9. PubMed 34588511 ↗
  • Tang J, Wang L, Luo T, Wu S, Wu Z, Chen J, Pan C, Wang Y, Liu Y, Luo Q, Guo X, Xie L, Zhou J, Sun Y, Chen W, Liao Y. Effectiveness of a Brief Mindfulness-Based Intervention of "STOP touching your face" During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Mindfulness (N Y). 2022;13(12):3123-3133. doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-02019-x. Epub 2022 Nov 9. PubMed 36408118 ↗
  • Liao Y, Wang L, Luo T, Wu S, Wu Z, Chen J, Pan C, Wang Y, Liu Y, Luo Q, Guo X, Xie L, Zhou J, Chen W, Tang J. Brief mindfulness-based intervention of 'STOP (Stop, Take a Breath, Observe, Proceed) touching your face': a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 24;10(11):e041364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041364. PubMed 33234653 ↗
  • Phang CK, Keng SL, Chiang KC. Mindful-S.T.O.P.: mindfulness made easy for stress reduction in medical students. Educ Med J. 2014;6(2):48-56. doi:10.5959/eimj.v6i2.230.
  • Linehan MM. DBT skills training manual. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2015.
  • Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Delacorte Press; 1990.
  • Fresco DM, Segal ZV, Buis T, Kennedy S. Relationship of posttreatment decentering and cognitive reactivity to relapse in major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Jun;75(3):447-55. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.447. PubMed 17563161 ↗
  • Etkin A, Prater KE, Schatzberg AF, Menon V, Greicius MD. Disrupted amygdalar subregion functional connectivity and evidence of a compensatory network in generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;66(12):1361-72. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.104. PubMed 19996041 ↗
  • Holzel BK, Hoge EA, Greve DN, Gard T, Creswell JD, Brown KW, Barrett LF, Schwartz C, Vaitl D, Lazar SW. Neural mechanisms of symptom improvements in generalized anxiety disorder following mindfulness training. Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Mar 25;2:448-58. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.011. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24179799 ↗
  • Kim MJ, Gee DG, Loucks RA, Davis FC, Whalen PJ. Anxiety dissociates dorsal and ventral medial prefrontal cortex functional connectivity with the amygdala at rest. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jul;21(7):1667-73. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq237. Epub 2010 Dec 1. PubMed 21127016 ↗
  • Nitschke JB, Sarinopoulos I, Oathes DJ, Johnstone T, Whalen PJ, Davidson RJ, Kalin NH. Anticipatory activation in the amygdala and anterior cingulate in generalized anxiety disorder and prediction of treatment response. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;166(3):302-10. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07101682. Epub 2009 Jan 2. PubMed 19122007 ↗
  • Roemer L, Orsillo SM, Salters-Pedneault K. Efficacy of an acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: evaluation in a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):1083-9. doi: 10.1037/a0012720. PubMed 19045976 ↗
  • Garg P, Mendiratta A, Banga A, Bucharles A, Victoria P, Kamaraj B, Qasba RK, Bansal V, Thimmapuram J, Pargament R, Kashyap R. Effect of breathing exercises on blood pressure and heart rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Dec 27;20:200232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200232. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 38179185 ↗
  • Lazarus RS, Cohen JB. Environmental stress. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editors. Human behavior and environment: advances in theory and research. Vol. 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1977. p. 89-127. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0808-9_3.
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1984.
  • Sari YP, Hsu YY, Nguyen TTB. The Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Mental Health Outcomes in Pregnant Woman: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Nurs Res. 2023 Dec 1;31(6):e306. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000586. PubMed 38036493 ↗
  • Lonnberg G, Jonas W, Unternaehrer E, Branstrom R, Nissen E, Niemi M. Effects of a mindfulness based childbirth and parenting program on pregnant women's perceived stress and risk of perinatal depression-Results from a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 1;262:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.048. Epub 2019 Oct 30. PubMed 31733457 ↗
  • Malakouti J, Mirghafourvand M, Dargahi R. The effect of education on perceived stress and anxiety in high risk pregnant women awaiting for amniocentesis: a quasi-experimental study. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2023;11(4):3946-3958. doi:10.22038/jmrh.2023.65033.1898.
  • Marom O, Weiner E, Gindes L, Mor L, Gury M, Toledano E, Alon AS, Miremberg H, Shalev J, Levy M. The effect of watching an informational video prior amniocentesis on maternal anxiety: a randomized controlled trail. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):1001-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07288-y. Epub 2023 Dec 7. PubMed 38060016 ↗
  • Caliskan E, Ozkan S, Cakiroglu Y, Yalcinkaya O, Polat A, Corakci A. The effects of maternal anxiety prior to amniocentesis on uterine and fetal umbilical blood flow. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2009 Sep 1;10(3):162-7. eCollection 2009. PubMed 24591861 ↗
  • Abera M, Hanlon C, Daniel B, Tesfaye M, Workicho A, Girma T, Wibaek R, Andersen GS, Fewtrell M, Filteau S, Wells JCK. Effects of relaxation interventions during pregnancy on maternal mental health, and pregnancy and newborn outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0278432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278432. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38271440 ↗
  • Luong-Thanh BY, Nguyen LH, Murray L, Eisner M, Valdebenito S, Hoang TD, Phuc Do H, Vo TV. Depression and its associated factors among pregnant women in central Vietnam. Health Psychol Open. 2021 Jan 25;8(1):2055102920988445. doi: 10.1177/2055102920988445. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun. PubMed 33598304 ↗
  • Luong TC, Pham TTM, Nguyen MH, Do AQ, Pham LV, Nguyen HC, Nguyen HC, Ha TH, Dao HK, Trinh MV, Do TV, Nguyen HQ, Nguyen TTP, Tran CQ, Tran KV, Duong TT, Pham HX, Do TT, Nguyen PB, Tra AL, Phan DT, Do BN, Duong TV. Fear, anxiety and depression among pregnant women during COVID-19 pandemic: impacts of healthy eating behaviour and health literacy. Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):2120-2131. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2001044. PubMed 34761972 ↗
  • Trần Thơ Nhị. Thực trạng trầm cảm và hành vi tìm kiếm hỗ trợ ở phụ nữ mang thai, sau sinh tại huyện Đông Anh, Hà Nội [luận án tiến sĩ Y tế công cộng]. Hà Nội: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2018.
  • Nguyễn Thị Tuyết, Hoàng Thị Diễm Tuyết, Đặng Ngọc Yến Dung, Trần Thị Hằng, Hoàng Thị Tâm Hòa, Võ Thị Phương Hoa, Trần Thị Quyền Nương, Nguyễn Thị Minh Trang, Võ Ý Lan. Tỷ lệ rối loạn trầm cảm ở thai phụ có tuổi thai từ 36 tuần đến 40 tuần tại Bệnh viện Hùng Vương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2025;547(1):310-313. doi:10.51298/vmj.v547i1.12911.
  • Trần Thị Trúc Phương, Tô Mai Xuân Hồng. Khảo sát tỉ lệ trầm cảm và các yếu tố liên quan trên phụ nữ mang thai ở 3 tháng cuối thai kỳ tại Bệnh viện Nguyễn Tri Phương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021;504(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v504i2.943.
  • Bayat A, Amiri-Farahani L, Soleimani M, Eshraghi N, Haghani S. Effect of short-term psychological intervention on anxiety of pregnant women with positive screening results for chromosomal disorders: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04206-5. PubMed 34753431 ↗
  • Kandemir H, Sanhal CY, Buyuk A, Temel Aksu N, Gunes Gencer GY, Sakinci M, Mendilcioglu I. Reducing Amniocentesis Anxiety: The Role of Pre-Procedural Video Information. Med Sci Monit. 2025 Feb 5;31:e946726. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946726. PubMed 39905707 ↗
  • Callioglu N, Yildirim ZK, Tuna G. The effect of video-based multimedia information before amniocentesis on pain, anxiety, and pregnancy outcomes. Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90929-w. PubMed 40044683 ↗
  • Ferber A, Onyeije CI, Zelop CM, O'Reilly-Green C, Divon MY. Maternal pain and anxiety in genetic amniocentesis: expectation versus reality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;19(1):13-7. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00606.x. PubMed 11851963 ↗
  • Marteau TM, Kidd J, Cook R, Michie S, Johnston M, Slack J, Shaw RW. Psychological effects of having amniocentesis: are these due to the procedure, the risk or the behaviour? J Psychosom Res. 1992 May;36(4):395-402. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90076-e. PubMed 1534372 ↗
  • Kowalcek I, Muhlhoff A, Bachmann S, Gembruch U. Depressive reactions and stress related to prenatal medicine procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;19(1):18-23. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00551.x. PubMed 11851964 ↗
  • Sarkar P, Bergman K, Fisk NM, Glover V. Maternal anxiety at amniocentesis and plasma cortisol. Prenat Diagn. 2006 Jun;26(6):505-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.1444. PubMed 16683297 ↗
  • Ng CC, Lai FM, Yeo GS. Assessment of maternal anxiety levels before and after amniocentesis. Singapore Med J. 2004 Aug;45(8):370-4. PubMed 15284930 ↗
09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Interventions
Arm changed STOP4P Intervention→STOP-4P With Video and Supportive Activities; Control→Video and Supportive Activities Without STOP-4P; Observation→Routine Care Only
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Interventions Arm changed STOP4P Intervention→STOP-4P With Video and Supportive Activities; Control→Video and Supportive Activities Without STOP-4P; Observation→Routine Care Only

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07835464
Lead sponsor
Hung Vuong Hospital
Responsible party
Nguyen Van Thong (Head of Medical Genetics Department, Hung Vuong Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Thong V Nguyen
Contact
bsngvanthong@gmail.com
+84 903194666
Thong V Nguyen
principal investigator · Hung Vuong Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion