ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07833618Updated Sep 22, 2026

A Phase II Study of ALT001 in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

A Phase 2 interventional study of ALT001 1.0 μg/kg and ALT001 2.0 μg/kg in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), sponsored by Darwin Origin (Hubei) Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Darwin Origin (Hubei) Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ALT001 is an allogeneic unrelated human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived protein complex under investigation for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 dose-ranging study in patients with ALS.

Approximately 150 participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive ALT001 1.0 μg/kg, ALT001 2.0 μg/kg, or matching placebo by intravenous infusion during the 24-week double-blind (DB) treatment period. During the OLE period, the active treatment groups will continue to receive their original dose under blinded conditions, whereas the placebo group will undergo re-randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1.0 or 2.0 μg/kg ALT001.

The primary objective is to evaluate the dose-response relationship and efficacy of ALT001 at 1.0 and 2.0 μg/kg and to determine the recommended dose for subsequent studies. Secondary objectives include assessment of biomarkers related to efficacy and exploration of changes in cytokines, immune function, proteomics, and immunogenicity (anti-drug antibodies, ADA), as well as evaluation of the safety of ALT001.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

978 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 38 across 662 interventional studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Darwin Origin (Hubei) Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants or their guardians must be able to understand the procedures and methods of this study, communicate adequately with the investigator, be willing to strictly comply with the clinical trial protocol to complete the study, and voluntarily sign a written form, or have informed consent signed by a legally authorized representative.
  2. Age 18 to 75 years (inclusive of both boundaries), of either sex.
  3. Diagnosis of definite or probable ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria of the World Federation of Neurology for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, including both familial and sporadic ALS patients.
  4. Forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 50% of predicted at the screening visit.
  5. Total ALSFRS-R score ≥ 30 and ≤ 40 prior to enrollment.
  6. If receiving riluzole or edaravone treatment before enrollment, participants must have been on a stable dose for ≥ 30 days prior to Day 1 of this study, and must maintain that dose until the final study visit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have other known diseases associated with motor neuron dysfunction that may confound or obscure the diagnosis of ALS.
  2. History of alcohol dependence or drug abuse within 6 months prior to screening, judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in this study.
  3. Apparent cognitive impairment ( scale: ≤19 for the illiterate group, ≤22 for the primary school group, and ≤26 for the junior high school and above group [>8 years of education]), or other unstable psychiatric disorders that the investigator considers unsuitable for participation (including suicidal intent, untreated major depression, etc.).
  4. Continuous use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), diaphragm pacing system, or invasive ventilation (tracheostomy) at screening.
  5. Severe diseases, myeloproliferative disorders, leukemia or lymphoma, malignant tumors, fractures, or severe scoliosis at screening, which the investigator considers would affect study evaluation.
  6. Other severe and/or uncontrolled major organ or unstable systemic diseases, including but not limited to uncontrolled diabetes, unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident or (within 6 months prior to screening), myocardial infarction (within 6 months prior to screening), severe congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled active infection, severe hepatic, renal or other severe metabolic diseases, or severe gastrointestinal diseases.
  7. Positive surface antigen (HBsAg) with HBV-DNA > (if HBsAg is negative, HBV-DNA testing is not required); positive virus (HCV) antibody with HCV-RNA > upper limit of normal (if anti-HCV is negative, HCV-RNA testing is not required); positive (HIV) antibody; or positive Treponema pallidum test.
  8. Pregnant or lactating women, and those planning to conceive during the medication period or within 3 months after stopping the medication.
  9. Participated in another interventional clinical study within 4 weeks prior to this study; received stem cell or exosome therapy within 1 year, or previously received ASO drug treatment or gene therapy.
  10. Judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in this study (e.g., significantly abnormalities in physical examination or laboratory tests).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ALT001 1.0 μg/kg

    Drug: ALT001 1.0 μg/kg

  • Experimental
    ALT001 2.0 μg/kg

    Drug: ALT001 2.0 μg/kg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugALT001 1.0 μg/kg

    Allogeneic unrelated human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived protein complex; 130 μg/vial (lyophilized powder); reconstituted and administered by intravenous infusion at 1.0 μg/kg body weight.

  • DrugALT001 2.0 μg/kg

    Allogeneic unrelated human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived protein complex; 130 μg/vial (lyophilized powder); reconstituted and administered by intravenous infusion at 2.0 μg/kg body weight.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo (ALT001 simulant) containing no active ingredient; identical in appearance, packaging, labeling, and post-reconstitution infusion presentation to ALT001.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score

    The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is a validated 12-item clinician-reported scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better function and lower scores indicating greater functional impairment. A higher (less negative) change from baseline indicates less functional decline.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24 (Week0, Week 1, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 21, Week 24 after randomization)

Secondary outcomes

  1. ALSFRS-R slope from baseline to Week 24 (double-blind period)

    Weekly rate of change in ALSFRS-R total score, calculated as the slope from baseline to Week 24 in the 24-week double-blind period. Higher (less negative) slope indicates slower functional decline.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24(Week 1, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 21, Week 24 after randomization)

  2. ALSFRS-R slope from baseline to Week 48 (overall study period)

    Weekly rate of change in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to Week 48, including the double-blind and open-label extension periods.

    Time frame: Overall study period:Week 1, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 21, Week 24, Week 25, Week 29, Week 33, Week 37, Week 41, Week 45, Week 48 after randomization(48 weeks)

  3. ALSFRS-R slope from Week 25 to Week 48 (open-label extension period)

    The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is a 12-item clinician-reported scale with a total score ranging from 0 to 48; higher scores indicate better function and lower scores indicate greater functional impairment. The single value reported for this outcome is the slope (rate of change) of the ALSFRS-R total score over time during the 24-week open-label extension (OLE) period, estimated by a mixed model for repeated measures using all post-baseline ALSFRS-R assessments at Weeks 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, and 48. The slope is expressed as change in ALSFRS-R total score per month (points/month); a less negative slope indicates slower functional decline. Only this single slope value is reported for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Week 25 to Week 48 (Week 25, Week 29, Week 33, Week 37, Week 41, Week 45, Week 48 after randomization)

  4. Assessment of Combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS)

    The Combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) is a single composite outcome that reports ONE value: the CAFS composite rank score. It aggregates two component measurements - (1) survival status and time to death or permanent assisted ventilation, and (2) change from baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score - using a pre-specified ranking rule: each participant is compared pairwise with every other participant, with time to death or permanent assisted ventilation taking precedence (earlier event = worse outcome) and change from baseline in ALSFRS-R total score used for participants who remain alive and free of permanent assisted ventilation (smaller decline = better outcome). The pairwise comparisons are summed to yield a single unitless CAFS composite rank score; higher scores indicate a better combined function-and-survival outcome. The component measurements are aggregated into this one reported value and are not repo

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 21, Week 24, Week 25, Week 29, Week 33, Week 37, Week 41, Week 45, Week 48 after randomization(48 weeks)

  5. Assessment of ventilator-free survival (VAFS)

    Time from randomization to the first occurrence of non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation (tracheostomy), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 21, Week 24, Week 25, Week 29, Week 33, Week 37, Week 41, Week 45, Week 48 after randomization(48 weeks)

  6. Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC) /slow vital capacity (SVC) percent predictedpercent predicted

    FVC expressed as percent of predicted normal value, assessed by spirometry. SVC expressed as percent of predicted normal value, assessed by spirometry.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (Week 0,Week 13,Week 24, Week25,Week37,Week48)

  7. Concentration of cytokines in serum (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-13, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, GRO-α, TNF-α, IL-2)

    Serum concentrations of the following cytokines, measured by central laboratory assay: IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-13, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, GRO-α, TNF-α and IL-2. Concentrations are reported in pg/mL for each cytokine. This outcome measure reports laboratory analyte concentrations, not a score on a scale; therefore an unabbreviated scale title, minimum/maximum score, and score direction do not apply.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 13, Week 24, Week 25, Week 37, Week48 after randomization.

  8. Change from baseline in ALSAQ-40 total score

    The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire-40 (ALSAQ-40) is a 40-item participant-reported quality-of-life scale; each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0-4). The total score ranges from 0 to 160, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (Week 0,Week 1, Week 13,Week 24, Week25,Week37,Week48)

  9. Change from baseline in ROADS total score

    The Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) is a 28-item linearly weighted disability scale; each item is scored from 0 to 2, giving a raw total score range of 0-56 that is linearly transformed to a standardized total score ranging from 0 to 146. Higher scores indicate better preserved function (less disability).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (Week 0,Week 1, Week 13,Week 24, Week25,Week37,Week48)

  10. Change from baseline in modified Ashworth scale score

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a clinician-rated scale used to assess muscle tone and spasticity during passive movement of the assessed muscle groups. Muscle tone is graded from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected part rigid), with grade 1+ indicating a slight increase in tone between grades 1 and 2. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 4 for each assessed muscle, with higher scores indicating greater spasticity (a worse outcome). This outcome measure reports the change from baseline in the Modified Ashworth Scale score; a positive change indicates worsening spasticity (a worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (Week 0, Week 1, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 21, Week 24, Week 25, Week 29, Week 33, Week 37, Week 41, Week 45, Week 48 after randomization)

  11. Change from baseline in grip strength (kg)

    Maximum hand grip strength measured by dynamometry, expressed in kilograms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (Week 0,Week 13,Week 24, Week25,Week37,Week48 )

  12. Change from baseline in muscle strength (MRC sum score)

    Manual muscle testing using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale summed across specified muscle groups; score ranges from 0 (no contraction) to 5 (normal strength) per muscle, with a higher total sum indicating better strength.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (Week 0,Week 13,Week 24, Week25,Week37,Week48 )

  13. Change from baseline in ALS Functional Staging System stage

    ALS Functional Staging System stage, assessed to characterize disease progression.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48(Week 0,Week 13,Week 24, Week25,Week37,Week48 )

  14. Concentration of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in plasma

    Plasma NfL concentration measured by central laboratory assay.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 21, Week 24, Week 25, Week 29, Week 33, Week 37, Week 41, Week 45, Week 48 after randomization(48 weeks)

  15. Concentration of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) in plasma

    Plasma TDP-43 concentration measured by central laboratory assay.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 13, Week 24, Week 25, Week 37, Week48 after randomization.

  16. Concentration of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) in plasma

    Plasma SOD1 concentration measured by central laboratory assay.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 13, Week 24, Week 25, Week 37, Week48 after randomization.

  17. Concentration of immunoglobulins in serum (IgG, IgM, IgA)

    Serum concentrations of immunoglobulins measured by central laboratory assay.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 13, Week 24, Week 25, Week 37, Week48 after randomization.

  18. Number and percentage of T-cell subsets in blood (CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, CD28+, CD16+)

    Enumeration of T-cell subsets by flow cytometry, including CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+ ratio.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 13, Week 24, Week 25, Week 37, Week48 after randomization.

  19. Plasma proteomics profile

    Proteomic profiling of plasma samples using a central laboratory platform.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 13, Week 24, Week 25, Week 37, Week48 after randomization.

  20. Incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADA)

    Number and percentage of participants with treatment-emergent ADA responses to ALT001.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 13, Week 24, Week 25, Week 37, Week48 after randomization.

  21. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Number and percentage of participants with TEAEs and SAEs, graded by NCI CTCAE version 6.0.

    Time frame: From informed consent through 28 days after last dose

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Jan 2028, 16 months later.

Of 36 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 73 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2026
First posted
Sep 22, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Sep 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07833618
Lead sponsor
Darwin Origin (Hubei) Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Pengfei Zhang, Director of Clinical Operations
Contact
zhangpengfei@darwincell.net
+86-13911241040

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion