ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07832149Updated Sep 23, 2026

Comparison of Open-Mouth and Closed-Mouth Impression Techniques for Complete Dentures

An interventional study of Open mouth impression technique and Closed mouth impression technique in Edentulism, sponsored by Watim Medical & Dental College. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Watim Medical & Dental College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial compares two final impression techniques for complete dentures, the open mouth technique and the closed mouth technique. Completely edentulous adults with well-formed ridges will be randomly assigned 1:1 to one of the two techniques. All dentures will be made by a single operator using the same materials and laboratory. Six weeks after insertion, an examiner blinded to group allocation will assess denture retention using the Kapur index, and patient satisfaction will be recorded using a 5-item Likert questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

In the open mouth group, border molding and the wash impression are made with the patient's mouth open and no occlusal contact. In the closed mouth group, occlusal rims are attached to the custom trays at a predetermined occlusal vertical dimension, and the impression is made while the patient closes and performs functional movements. Jaw relations, try-in, and insertion follow the same protocol for both groups. Retention is scored separately for the maxillary and mandibular dentures, with a score of 2 or 3 counted as adequate. Satisfaction scores range from 5 to 25, and a score of 16 or above counts as satisfied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Edentulism

Keywords

  • Complete denture
  • Open mouth impression technique
  • Closed mouth impression technique
  • Denture retention
  • Kapur index
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Watim Medical & Dental College is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 70 years
  • Completely edentulous in both maxilla and mandible for at least six months, confirmed by clinical examination and orthopantomogram
  • Well-formed ridges, ACP classification Class I or Class II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Flabby or hypermobile ridges
  • Atrophic ridges
  • Ridges with bony exostosis
  • Active oral pathology
  • History of radiotherapy to head and neck
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Neuromuscular or neurological disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
88 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: Open Mouth Technique

    Final impressions made in custom trays with sectional border molding using low fusing impression compound and a zinc oxide eugenol wash, with the mouth open and no occlusal contact.

    Procedure: Open mouth impression technique

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Closed Mouth Technique

    Final impressions made in custom trays with attached occlusal rims set to a predetermined vertical dimension. Border molding and the wash impression are made while the patient closes into occlusion and performs functional movements.

    Procedure: Closed mouth impression technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureOpen mouth impression technique

    Secondary impression of the edentulous arch made in a custom acrylic tray. Border molding is done in sections with low fusing impression compound, followed by a zinc oxide eugenol wash impression. The clinician manipulates the tissues and the patient performs functional movements, with the mouth open and no occlusal contact. All steps are done by a single trained operator using the same materials and laboratory as the comparison group.

    Also known as: Open mouth functional impression, Conventional border molded impression

  • ProcedureClosed mouth impression technique

    Secondary impression made in custom trays with occlusal rims attached and adjusted to a predetermined occlusal vertical dimension. Maxillary and mandibular trays are inserted together. Border molding with low fusing impression compound and a zinc oxide eugenol wash impression are made while the patient closes into occlusion and performs functional movements, recording the denture bearing areas under simulated functional load. All steps are done by a single trained operator using the same materials and laboratory as the comparison group.

    Also known as: Closed mouth functional impression, Functional impression under occlusal loading

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adequate retention of maxillary denture

    Kapur index score (0 nil, 1 poor, 2 fair, 3 good) assessed by a blinded examiner. A score of 2 or 3 is adequate and 0 or 1 is inadequate.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after denture insertion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adequate retention of mandibular denture

    Kapur index score assessed the same way as the maxillary denture.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after denture insertion

  2. Patient satisfaction

    5-item Likert questionnaire covering retention, comfort, mastication, phonetics, and overall satisfaction, with a total score of 5 to 25. A score of 16 or above counts as satisfied.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after denture insertion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Prosthodontics, Watim Medical and Dental College, Rawat, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province 46000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly to protect participant confidentiality. Summary results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Mar 2027; primary completion for Jun 2027, 3 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2026
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
StartEst.
Mar 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Sep 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07832149
Lead sponsor
Watim Medical & Dental College
Responsible party
Dr. Fatima Shakeel (Postgraduate Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, Watim Medical & Dental College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Fatima Shakeel, BDS
Contact
fatimasmir25@gmail.com
+92 335 8416673
Fatima Shakeel, BDS
principal investigator · Watim Medical and Dental College
Zarah Afreen, BDS, FCPS
study director · Watim Medical and Dental College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion