An interventional study of Video-Assisted Training and Traditional Training in Urinary Catheterization Skills, sponsored by Behire SANÇAR. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.
Sponsored by Behire SANÇAR · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
This randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of video-assisted training on urinary catheter insertion skills, state anxiety, and satisfaction with educational methods among first-year nursing students. A total of 74 students were randomly assigned to either the video-assisted training group or the control group. All participants received traditional theoretical instruction and laboratory demonstration on urinary catheter insertion. In addition, students in the intervention group watched a researcher-prepared instructional video on the procedure, while students in the control group received traditional training only. Outcomes included urinary catheter insertion skills, state anxiety, and satisfaction with educational methods.
7,207 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 74 is close to the median of 80 across 6,062 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.
Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →This is the only study on the registry with Behire SANÇAR as lead sponsor.
Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants received traditional theoretical instruction and laboratory demonstration on urinary catheter insertion without access to the instructional video during the study. The video was made available to the control group after completion of the study.
Other: Video-Assisted Training · Other: Traditional Training
Participants received traditional theoretical instruction and laboratory demonstration on urinary catheter insertion without access to the instructional video during the study. The video was made available to the control group after completion of the study.
Other: Traditional Training
A researcher-prepared approximately 12-minute instructional video demonstrating urinary catheter insertion was provided to the intervention group through the university's learning management system (ALMS). Students could watch the video and rewatch it as needed. The video-assisted training was provided in addition to the traditional theoretical instruction and laboratory demonstration received by all participants.
Traditional theoretical instruction and laboratory demonstration on urinary catheter insertion were provided to participants.
Urinary Catheterization Skill Performance
Urinary catheterization skill performance was assessed using the Urinary Catheterization Skill Checklist. The checklist was developed by the researchers based on the literature and evaluated for content validity by 10 nursing faculty members using the Davis technique. Higher scores indicate better urinary catheterization skill performance.
Time frame: Immediately after the educational intervention
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Apr 2025 to primary completion in May 2025, 1 month.
Of 3,841 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 28. This study's 1 month is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 3,943 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 28.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.