An interventional study of Endoscopic-guided Sinus lift and non- endoscopic sinus lift in Bone Defects, sponsored by Nahla Mahmoud Awad. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.
Sponsored by Nahla Mahmoud Awad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
To compare Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift; bone grafting will be performed, followed by implant placement. Membrane perforation rates, surgical time, and bone density changes will be evaluated.
Type of study design: A Randomized Clinical Trial Objective of the research: To compare Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift; bone grafting will be performed, followed by implant placement. Membrane perforation rates, surgical time, and bone density changes will be evaluated.
Steps of the research in short including the following:
Exclusion criteria Parafunctional habits, Drug or alcohol abuse, uncontrolled systemic diseases that contraindicate implant surgery, pregnant women, Smokers.
Group 2 (Endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was conducted after each drilling step, osteotome malleting, and bone graft placement to monitor sinus membrane integrity.
Sample size calculation.
Patients in both groups will be followed up at 24-hours, one, three, six, months postoperatively to assess this parameter:
Exclusion Criteria:
Endoscopic-guided sinus lifting
Procedure: Endoscopic-guided Sinus lift
conventional sinus lift
Procedure: non- endoscopic sinus lift
12 patients in Group 2 (Endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was conducted after each drilling step, osteotome malleting, and bone graft placement to monitor sinus membrane integrity.
12 patients in Group 1(non-endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was performed after complete osteotomy preparation and sinus membrane elevation using osteotomes.
Membrane integrity intraoperative.
Membrane remains intact ( no perforation)
Time frame: 24 hours
mean bone density
CBCT
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.