ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07817212ESRAUpdated Sep 14, 2026

ESR1Real World Assessment Prevalence Study

An interventional study of ESR1 testing in HR+/HER2- aBC Undergoing 1L Treatment With CDK4/6i (Palbociclib, Abemaciclib or Ribociclib) and AI (Anastrozole or Letrozole), sponsored by Institut fuer Frauengesundheit. Not yet recruiting at 21 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Institut fuer Frauengesundheit · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,550
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Many patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer in the first therapy line is endocrine sensitive. For these patients the established 1st line standard therapy is a combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an aromatase inhibitor. This combination therapy is usually given until clinical progression.

Recent studies suggest that a detection of a somatic ESR1 mutation in the ctDNA can be clinically used to prompt an earlier change from the aromatase inhibitor to a selective estrogen receptor degrader.

For implementation in the clinical routine it is important to gain knowledge about the dynamics of ESR1 mutation in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients during their first line therapy. At the beginning of the first line therapy about 5-8% of patients show an ESR1 mutation. An identification of patients with resistance to aromatase inhibitors at that timepoint might not be feasible and cost-efficient. At the timepoint of clinical progression up to 30-40% of patients will have acquired an ESR1 mutation. Knowledge about the mutation frequencies at different timepoints will be very helpful to direct testing strategies for implementing testing broadly in a population.

The aim of this study is to test ESR1 mutation frequencies in groups of patients (single time test per patient) with no clinical progression and different durations under first-line treatment with aromatase inhibitor and CDK4/4 inhibitor.

02

Conditions studied

  • HR+/HER2- aBC Undergoing 1L Treatment With CDK4/6i (Palbociclib, Abemaciclib or Ribociclib) and AI (Anastrozole or Letrozole)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Institut fuer Frauengesundheit is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject must be female or male and aged ≥ 18 years on the day of signing
  2. Patient has locally advanced or breast cancer not amenable to curative treatment
  3. Patient has - breast cancer confirmed by local laboratory, defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0 or 1+. If IHC is 2+, a negative in situ hybridization (FISH, CISH, or SISH) test is required to confirm the HER2-negative status (based on the most recently analyzed tissue sample tested by a local laboratory)
  4. confirmed ER-positive and/ or PgR-positive breast cancer determined by core according to local in-house standard
  5. Patient has already initiated or is about to initiate therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (any CDK4/6i) in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (non-steroidal AI). Treatment must be intended as first-line systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic disease
  6. Information about prior oncological therapies against the HR+/HER2- BC must be available
  7. Data about histo-pathological report must be available, including hormone receptor status, tumor histology, tumor grading and HER2 immunohistochemistry
  8. Inclusion in the study occurs as a single, one-time event for each patient, within one of the 9 defined cohorts

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with an interruption of ongoing CDK4/6i plus AI therapy exceeding 1 month for either CDK4/6i or AI
  2. Patients receiving any other systemic anticancer therapy for HR+/- aBC, except for LHRH agonists, bisphosphonates, or denosumab
  3. Clinical evidence of progression at the timepoint of study inclusion
  4. Patients have already completed ≥ 1L of systemic therapy for aBC
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,550 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort (0m)

    Before start of the 1L treatment (anticipated AI + CDK4/6i)

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (6-8m):

    Patients in months 6, 7 or 8 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (9-11m)

    Patients in months 9, 10 or 11 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (12-14m)

    Patients in months 12, 13 or 14 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (15-17m)

    Patients in months 15, 16 or 17 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (18-20m)

    Patients in months 18, 19 or 20 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (21-23m)

    Patients in months 21, 22 or 23 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (24-26m)

    Patients in months 24, 25 or 26 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

  • Experimental
    Cohort (27-29m)

    Patients in months 27, 28 or 29 of the 1L treatment

    Diagnostic Test: ESR1 testing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testESR1 testing

    Study procedures comprise of a blood sample for ESR1 mutation testing and blood samples for translational research. ESR1 test results from a central testing facility are communicated back to the study site. Treatment of patients will continue as per discretion of the treating physician and will be documented during a single timepoint 3 months post inclusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PO1

    mutation frequency of ESR1 mutations as assessed in blood sample

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. SO1

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to age and BMI

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. SO2

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to type of CDK4/6i therapy

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. SO3

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to type of aromatase inhibitor

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. SO3

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to menopausal status

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. SO4

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to HER2 status (HER2 0, HER2 ultralow, HER2 low)

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. SO5

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to extent of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. SO6

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to tumor grading

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. SO7

    ESR1 mutation frequencies according to previous therapies (de novo patients vs. previous adjuvant therapy)

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. EO1

    To explore the molecular landscape accompanying ESR1 mutations, including co-occurring genomic alterations (e.g., PIK3CA, TP53, etc.) detected in ctDNA

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. EO2

    To investigate associations between ESR1 mutation characteristics (variant type, allele frequency) and clinical or molecular features, including prior AI exposure.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. EO3

    To perform transcriptomic profiling (bulk RNA-seq) of circulating immune cells (PBMCs) to identify immune activation or suppression signatures associated with clinical progression (PD vs. non-PD).

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. EO4

    To explore potential biomarkers of endocrine resistance and immune modulation, integrating ctDNA muta

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

21 sites
  • ANregiomed gKU, AöR, Klinikum Ansbach
    Ansbach, 91522, Germany
  • Hämato-Onkologische Praxis im Medicum; Brustzentrum
    Bremen, Germany
  • Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle; Brustzentrum
    Celle, 29223, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Frauenklinik
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
    • Theresa Link, Dr. · Contact+49 351 4586863
  • Kostara Gyn. Onkoloy Clinic Research UG
    Düsseldorf, 40235, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum; Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe & Reproduktionsmedizin
    Homburg, 66421, Germany
  • Frauenarztpraxis Baerens
    Ilsede, 31241, Germany
  • OncoStudies Lörrach, Onkologie Dreiländereck
    Loerrach, 79539, Germany
  • Rotkreuzklinikum München; Brustzentrum
    München, 80637, Germany
  • Hämatologie OnkologieMünchen Pasing MVZ GmbH
    München, 81241, Germany
  • MVZ Media Vita am St. Franziskus Hospital; Frauenklinik
    Münster, 48145, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster; Frauenklinik
    Münster, 48727, Germany
  • Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann; Frauenheilkunde
    Potsdam, 14467, Germany
  • medicum Rosenheim MVZ GmbH; Innere Onkologie
    Rosenheim, 83022, Germany
  • Kreiskrankenhaus Torgau; Brustzentrum
    Torgau, 04860, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen; Department für Frauengesundheit
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • Medizinische Studiengesellschaft Nord-West GmbH; Onkologie
    Westerstede, 26655, Germany
  • Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken; Gynäkologie
    Wiesbaden, 65199, Germany
  • Frauenärzte am Schloß; Praxis für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
    Wolfenbüttel, 38304, Germany
  • Universitätsklinik Würzburg; Frauenklinik und Poliklinik
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2026
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07817212
Lead sponsor
Institut fuer Frauengesundheit
Collaborators
AGO Breast (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie), data4treat GmbH, BioMedStatistics GmbH, ClinSol GmbH & Co KG, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Sponsor's study office
Contact
esra@ifg-erlangen.de
+49 9131 91880613
Peter Andreas Fasching, Prof. Dr.
study director · AGO-B e.V. c/o Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen
Volkmar Müller, Prof. Dr.
study chair · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie
Tanja Fehm, Prof. Dr.
study chair · Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Düsseldorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion