An interventional study of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Local Amikacin Injection and Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Bronchiectasis With Acute Exacerbation, sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.
Sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory system disease characterized by irreversible structural dilation of the bronchi, persistent cough, and alternating periods of stability and acute exacerbation during the clinical course. Although airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are widely recommended, some hospitalized patients are unable to fully participate in conventional physical therapy due to respiratory difficulties or impaired sputum clearance. Bronchoscopic airway clearance therapy (B-ACT), combined with bronchoalveolar lavage under direct bronchoscopic visualization, can remove airway secretions. Previous studies have shown that bronchoscopy-guided airway clearance therapy (B-ACT) may prolong the time from discharge to the first exacerbation. In China, there have been studies exploring the use of bronchoscopy-guided alveolar lavage combined with local application of amikacin to treat patients with bronchiectasis. This study aims to explore whether the local application of amikacin after bronchoscopy-guided saline alveolar lavage provides greater benefits for patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis compared to conventional treatment (non-bronchoscopy lavage) and bronchoscopy-guided saline alveolar lavage. The goal is to apply this treatment method in clinical practice to reduce the frequency of acute exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis, improve prognosis, and enhance quality of life.
All enrolled patients are in the acute exacerbation phase of bronchiectasis. A total of 186 patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis (1:1:1 allocation) who are willing to participate in this study and sign an informed consent form will be enrolled. The patients will be divided into three groups: Control Group A (based on routine clinical treatment, including anti-infection and expectorant therapy), Control Group B (in addition to routine use of antibacterial and expectorant medications, using bronchoscopy to wash the affected lung lobe with 180ml of saline), and Research Group C (in addition to routine use of antibacterial and expectorant medications, using bronchoscopy to wash the affected lung lobe with 180ml of saline, followed by local injection of a mixture formed by adding 2 vials of Amikacin (specification: 0.2g/2ml) to 20ml of saline into the target bronchiectasis area).
404 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiectasis; 125 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 186 is above the median of 60 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Bronchiectasis.
Browse Bronchiectasis studies →First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
While routinely using antibiotics and expectorants for treatment, perform bronchoscopy and lavage the affected lung lobe with 180ml of saline.
Procedure: Bronchoalveolar Lavage
While routinely using antibiotics and expectorants for treatment, perform bronchoscopic lavage of the affected lung lobe with 180ml of saline; after lavage, locally inject a mixture of 2 vials of Amikacin (specification: 0.2g/2ml) mixed with 20ml of saline into the target bronchiectasis area.
Procedure: Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Local Amikacin Injection
While routinely using antibiotics and expectorants for treatment, perform bronchoscopic lavage of the affected lung lobe with 180ml of saline; after lavage, locally inject a mixture of 2 vials of Amikacin (specification: 0.2g/2ml) mixed with 20ml of saline into the target bronchiectasis area.
While routinely using antibiotics and expectorants for treatment, perform bronchoscopy and lavage the affected lung lobe with 180ml of saline.
Time of first acute exacerbation
Length of post-treatment time points to first acute exacerbation (days) in all three groups of patients.
Time frame: six months
The change of mMRC scores
The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). Categorised on a scale of 0 to 4, the higher the scale the more severe the symptoms are.
Time frame: one month]
The change of CAT scores
COPD assessment test (CAT) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). A score of 0-10 is considered mild, 11-20 is considered moderate, 21-30 is considered severe, and 31-40 is considered very severe.
Time frame: one month
The change of LCQ scores
Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). Scores range from 3 to 21, with lower scores suggesting that cough has a greater impact on quality of life.
Time frame: one month
The change of SGQR scores
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). The total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life for the patient.
Time frame: one month
adverse effects
Occurrence of post-treatment adverse effects (chest tightness, shortness of breath, worsening of respiratory failure, worsening of haemoptysis, complication of new pneumonia foci or signs of significant new infections considered to be related to lavage treatment) in the three groups of patients.
Time frame: one month
Re-treatment with bronchoalveolar lavage
Hospitalisation for acute exacerbations requiring re-bronchoscopic lavage within 6 months in all three groups (re-bronchoscopic lavage may be considered for exacerbations after treatment: significant increase in sputum output, increase in the size of the lesion on CT).
Time frame: six months
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University