ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07813052Updated Sep 10, 2026

Effects of Exercise Combined With Cognitive Training on Motor Performance in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder

An interventional study of Combined exercise-cognitive training and Exercise-only training in Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), sponsored by Shanghai University of Sport. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Shanghai University of Sport · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered Aug 2026).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Developmental Coordination Disorder(DCD) is a common neuro-developmental disorder in childhood, characterized by deficits in motor coordination. This study aimed to examine the effects of exercise combined with cognitive training versus exercise-only training on balance-postural control, gross motor skills and physical fitness in children with DCD.

Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Twenty children aged 7-11 years diagnosed with DCD were randomly allocated into experimental group(n=10) receiving 10-week combined exercise-cognitive training and control group(n=10) receiving exercise-only training. Training was implemented 3 sessions per week, 60 minutes per session for 10 weeks. Outcome assessments were performed at baseline, week-6 and week-10. Motor performance indicators included Y-balance test, eyes-closed single-leg stand, BOT-2 gross-motor sub-scale and national student physical fitness tests.

02

Conditions studied

  • Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD)

Keywords

  • Developmental Coordination Disorder
  • children
  • combined motor-cognitive training
  • dynamic balance
  • motor skills
  • motor function
03

In context

Motor Skills Disorders

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Skills Disorders; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 40 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Motor Skills Disorders.

Browse Motor Skills Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai University of Sport is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children aged between 7-11 years old.
  2. Satisfied screening criteria for Developmental Coordination Disorder: MABC-2 total percentile ≤16 or sub-item percentile ≤5; meet age-cut-off score of DCD-Q questionnaire.
  3. Caregiver reported motor difficulties have presented from early developmental stage.
  4. Participants are capable of completing all training and assessment procedures.
  5. Written provided by legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, ADHD or other neurodevelopmental disorders.
  2. Severe organic disease that contraindicates physical exercise.
  3. Receiving concurrent physical therapy or occupational therapy targeting motor coordination during study period.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combined motor-cognitive training group

    Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder received combined motor-cognitive training. Each session integrated physical exercise and cognitive tasks to improve motor performance

    Behavioral: Combined exercise-cognitive training

  • Active comparator
    Exercise-only training control group

    children received general physical-activity training with the same frequency, duration and intensity as the experimental group, without additional cognitive tasks.

    Behavioral: Exercise-only training

Interventions

  • BehavioralCombined exercise-cognitive training

    Participants received 10-week training, 3 sessions per week, 60 minutes per session. Each session contained 30-minute fundamental motor-skill exercise (running, jumping, kicking, throwing, catching), plus 30-minute cognitive training consisting of action observation, motor-imagery guided tasks with picture/video prompts. Training difficulty was progressively divided into basic phase(1-3w), advanced phase(4-6w), and integration phase(7-10w).

  • BehavioralExercise-only training

    Participants received identical 30-minute fundamental motor-skill physical exercise same as experimental group each session. Instead of cognitive training, children performed matched quiet non-cognitive rest activity for another 30 minutes, to equalize total trainer-contact time. The whole intervention lasted 10 weeks, three sessions weekly, 60 minutes each session.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Gross Motor Skills Assessed by the BOT-2

    The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2) evaluates gross motor skills, including balance, bilateral coordination, and running speed. The Total Motor Composite standard score will be reported. The standard score ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 80. Higher scores indicate better gross motor proficiency and coordination.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention (10 weeks).

  2. Change in Dynamic Postural Control Assessed by the Y-Balance

    Measures maximum controlled reach distance in three directions while maintaining a single-leg stance.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention (10 weeks).

  3. Change in Static Postural Control Assessed by the Single-Leg Stance Test with Eyes Closed

    Participants stand on one leg with their eyes closed. The duration (in seconds) they can successfully maintain balance is recorded to evaluate static postural control and proprioceptive integration capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention 10weeks

  4. Change in Lower Limb Coordination Assessed by the Side Hop Test

    Participants perform continuous lateral jumps back and forth over a set distance within a limited time. The total number of successful jumps is recorded to reflect lower limb coordination and rapid posture adjustment ability.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention 10weeks

  5. Change in Sprinting Speed Assessed by the 50-Meter Dash

    The time taken (in seconds) to complete a 50-meter sprint is recorded to evaluate physical speed and acceleration capabilities.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention 10weeks

  6. Change in Coordination and Cardiopulmonary Endurance Assessed by the 1-Minute Jump Rope Test

    The number of valid jumps completed within one minute is recorded to reflect whole-body coordination and cardiopulmonary endurance levels.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention 10weeks

  7. Change in Lower Limb Explosive Power Assessed by the Standing Long Jump

    The maximum valid horizontal jump distance (in centimeters) is recorded to evaluate the explosive power of the lower limbs.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention 10weeks

  8. Change in Core Muscle Endurance Assessed by the 1-Minute Sit-Up Test

    The number of correctly performed sit-ups completed in one minute is recorded to evaluate trunk and core muscle endurance.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention 10weeks

  9. Change in Flexibility Assessed by the Sit-and-Reach Test

    The maximum forward reach distance (in centimeters) is recorded to evaluate the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ,6weeks and post-intervention 10weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shanghai University of Sport
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200438, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 8 months.

Of 46 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Motor Skills Disorders, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 50. This study's 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 46 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 26, 2026
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
StartActual
Oct 14, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07813052
Lead sponsor
Shanghai University of Sport
Responsible party
DU Wenqian (Principal Investigator, Shanghai University of Sport) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
Start date
Oct 14, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion