An interventional study of Judicial Assistance Dog in Animal-Human Bonding, Animal-assisted Intervention and Behavioural Responses to Contact With Dogs, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.
Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Child maltreatment is common and encompasses various forms, including psychological, physical, and sexual abuse, exposure to domestic violence, neglect, and sexual exploitation. Each year, French police and gendarmerie services record more than 50,000 child victims of intrafamilial violence, according to data from the Ministerial Statistical Service for Internal Security (SSMSI). Approximately two-thirds of these children are victims of physical violence and one-third are victims of sexual violence. These figures have increased steadily over recent years, particularly for sexual violence, in the context of greater disclosure by victims. Violence against children constitutes a major public health issue because of its short- and long-term physical, psychological, and developmental consequences, as well as the increased risk of involvement in future violence during adolescence or adulthood, either as victims or perpetrators.
Children presumed to be victims of abuse are managed in Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Units (Unités d'Accueil Pédiatrique Enfance en Danger, UAPEDs) by multidisciplinary teams comprising physicians, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, following judicial referral or concerns raised by parents or caregivers. Depending on the circumstances, the child may undergo a forensic interview conducted on-site by law enforcement officers (police or gendarmerie), followed by a medico-legal and/or psychological assessment to evaluate the impact of the alleged abuse. This model enables comprehensive care to be delivered in a single location and within a limited timeframe, with professionals working around the child, thereby minimizing repeated disclosures and reducing the risk of retraumatization. The vast majority of forensic interviews are conducted by investigators trained in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) protocol for interviewing children.
It has been hypothesized that the involvement of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD) may provide benefits to children during forensic interviews, a key stage of the judicial process that can be highly stressful for child victims of abuse who are asked to recount traumatic experiences to an unfamiliar investigator.
For centuries, dogs have been domesticated to accompany humans. Since the late twentieth century, they have been specifically trained to assist vulnerable individuals, support people with chronic conditions, and participate in animal-assisted interventions. The role of dogs as part of healthcare and psychosocial support has been extensively studied in recent years. Animal-assisted interventions have been used in a variety of clinical settings with the aim of reducing anxiety, pain, and stress-related symptoms through mechanisms involving emotional regulation and attentional processes. Several studies have reported benefits among children with mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, and problematic video gaming behaviors. Assistance dogs are also frequently incorporated into interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder to promote prosocial behaviors, with beneficial interactions observed regardless of the child's verbal communication abilities. In pediatric hospital settings, animal-assisted therapy has been associated with reductions in both blood pressure and pain levels.
These effects may be mediated by physiological mechanisms. Exposure to a dog for 15 minutes has been associated with significant reductions in cortisol levels (13), while human-dog interactions have also been linked to changes in electroencephalographic activity and heart rate, potentially enhancing shared attention and emotional regulation.
The concept of the Judicial Assistance Dog first emerged in the United States in the early 2000s within court settings. In France, following a model similar to that developed in North America, the first Judicial Assistance Dog, named Lol, joined the Cahors Court of Justice in 2019 to support victims throughout judicial proceedings. Orko, the second Judicial Assistance Dog trained in France, joined the Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Unit of Orléans University Hospital in 2020.
Several potential benefits of Judicial Assistance Dogs during forensic interviews have been suggested, including reductions in signs of distress and anxiety among child victims. A study conducted in the United States demonstrated significant decreases in heart rate and blood pressure among presumed child victims of sexual abuse who were accompanied by an assistance dog during the forensic process.
This study aims to measure the anxious state of the minor when he first arrives at the unit (T0) and 10 minutes later (T1) with or without the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD).
The minor is randomized in one of the two groups of the study:
Then an anxiety measure occurs. Two time point are evaluated: at arrival (T0) and after waiting 10min (T1):
7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 46 is below the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.
Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans is the lead sponsor of 132 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.
Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Children assigned to this group will have contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog before the forensic interview.
Behavioral: Judicial Assistance Dog
Children assigned to this group will undergo the standard pre-interview waiting period without contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog.
After randomization, the Judicial Assistance Dog will be introduced to the child in the waiting room, and the child will remain in contact with the dog for 10 minutes.
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on the chil's anxiety level prior to the forensic interview.
Comparison of the change in STAI-C scores between T1 (after 10 min of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the Judicial Assistance Dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room)
Time frame: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on heart rate
Comparison of the change in heart rate (beats per minute, bpm) between T1 (after 10 minutes of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the judicial assistant dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room)
Time frame: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on perceived anxiety
Comparison of the change in score on the Anxiety Level Self-Assessment Scale between T1 (after 10 minutes of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the judicial assistant dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room).
Time frame: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans →