ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07810426CIED-SLING24Updated Sep 9, 2026

Effects of Short-Term Arm Sling Use After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Placement

An interventional study of Medical Arm Sling in Postoperative Care After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation, sponsored by Tugba Yorulmaz. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Tugba Yorulmaz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effects of short-term medical arm sling use during the first 24 hours after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation on patient comfort, pain, satisfaction, and early device-related complications.

Adult patients undergoing first-time implantation of a permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group or a control group. Patients in the intervention group will receive standard postoperative care and use a medical arm sling on the side of device implantation for 24 hours. Patients in the control group will receive standard postoperative care without an arm sling. Both groups will otherwise receive the same nursing care, including wound monitoring, pain management, and early mobilization education.

Pain and comfort will be assessed during the first 24 hours after implantation. Patient satisfaction with arm sling use will be evaluated in the intervention group at 24 hours. Early device-related complications, including pocket hematoma, bleeding, swelling, wound-related findings, lead dislodgement, device abnormalities, and other early postoperative complications, will be assessed during hospitalization, at discharge, and at the first-week follow-up. Outcome assessments will be performed by an investigator who is blinded to group allocation.

Read the detailed description

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, are widely used in the management of bradyarrhythmias, tachyarrhythmias, and heart failure. The early postoperative period following CIED implantation is important because device-related complications such as pocket hematoma, bleeding, swelling, wound-related problems, and lead-related complications may occur during this period.

Postoperative restriction of arm movement and the use of an arm sling are commonly applied in clinical practice; however, practices vary considerably between centers, and there is no clear consensus regarding the necessity or optimal duration of arm sling use following CIED implantation. While arm immobilization may provide a sense of protection and may potentially reduce movement-related concerns, unnecessary restriction may also negatively affect comfort, pain, mobility, and the overall patient experience.

Previous studies have mainly focused on device-related complications or shoulder function following CIED implantation. Evidence regarding the effects of short-term medical arm sling use on patient-centered outcomes, particularly comfort, pain, and satisfaction, together with early device-related complications, remains limited. Therefore, this study is designed to provide randomized controlled evidence on the clinical and patient-centered effects of using a medical arm sling during the first 24 hours after CIED implantation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Care After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation

Keywords

  • Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
  • CIED
  • Arm Sling
  • Pacemaker
  • Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
  • Postoperative Care
  • Pain
  • Patient Comfort
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Device-Related Complications
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 104 is above the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Tugba Yorulmaz as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Aged 18 years or older. Undergoing first-time implantation of a permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device.

Clinically stable during the first 24 hours after the procedure. Able to read, understand, and communicate in Turkish. Willing to participate in the study and provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Undergoing device revision, lead replacement, or generator replacement. Presence of an orthopedic or neurological condition that restricts upper-extremity movement.

Presence of cognitive impairment or a communication barrier. Development of a major complication during the implantation procedure. Request to withdraw from the study.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Medical Arm Sling Group

    Participants will receive standard postoperative care and will use a medical arm sling on the side of CIED implantation for 24 hours after the procedure.

    Device: Medical Arm Sling

  • No intervention
    Standard Care Group

    Participants will receive standard postoperative care without the use of a medical arm sling.

Interventions

  • DeviceMedical Arm Sling

    A medical arm sling will be applied to the upper extremity on the side of CIED implantation immediately after the procedure and will be used for 24 hours. Participants will receive standardized instructions regarding proper arm sling use. All other postoperative nursing care will be provided according to the standard care protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Comfort Assessed Using the Visual Analog Comfort Scale

    Patient comfort will be assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analog Comfort Scale, where 0 indicates "not comfortable at all" and 10 indicates "completely comfortable." Higher scores indicate greater patient comfort.

    Time frame: 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after CIED implantation

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to participant confidentiality, privacy, and ethical considerations. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 12 months later.

Of 3,731 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 12 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,830 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2026
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07810426
Lead sponsor
Tugba Yorulmaz
Responsible party
Tugba Yorulmaz (Lecturer, PhD, Acibadem University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Tuğba Yorulmaz, PhD
Contact
tugba.yorulmaz@acibadem.edu.tr
+90 216 500 4220 ext. 4220
Rabia Muhan Eraslan, MSc
Contact
rabia.muhan@acibadem.edu.tr
+90 216 500 7707 ext. 7707
Tugba Yorulmaz, PhD
principal investigator · Acibadem University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion