ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07804771PrediFallUpdated Sep 4, 2026

Polymodal Fall Prediction in Healthy Older Adults: Clinical, Laboratory, and Blood-Based Biomarkers

An observational study in Accidental Falls, sponsored by Slb Pharma. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Sponsored by Slb Pharma · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to identify clinical, laboratory, and biological markers associated with past (and future falls) in healthy older adults aged 65 years and over.

The main question it aims to answer is: Which clinical, functional, laboratory, and blood-based markers distinguish older adults who have fallen at least once during the previous 12 months from those who have not?

Researchers will compare older adults with a history of falls with similar older adults without a history of falls. One hundred healthy older adults aged 65 and over, including both fallers and non-fallers, will be recruited for the study.

Participants will complete questionnaires and undergo cognitive and physical tests, physical activity and sleep monitoring, gait, balance, muscle, sensory and vestibular assessments, brain and muscle imaging, and blood sampling. Blood samples will be used to study proteins and genetic variants that may be associated with falls. Participants will then be followed for one year using a smartphone-based application to report falls.

The study is based on the hypothesis that a history of falling in an otherwise healthy older adult may be associated with subtle clinical, functional, and biological differences compared with a similar older adult without a history of falls. The findings may support the future development of more accurate and scalable tools for early fall-risk detection and targeted fall-prevention strategies. No direct therapeutic benefit is expected from participation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Accidental Falls
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Slb Pharma is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years who meet the study eligibility criteria. The study will recruit 100 participants: 50 who experienced at least one fall during the 12 months before enrollment and 50 who experienced no falls during that period. All participants will undergo the same baseline assessments and prospective 12-month fall monitoring.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • being aged ≥65 years,
  • having independent ambulation,
  • having an (MMSE) score ≥24,
  • being fluent in French,
  • being affiliated with the national social security system,
  • providing written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological or psychiatric disorders affecting motor or cognitive function (e.g., Parkinson's disease, stroke sequelae, major depression) or other severe comorbidities that could affect participant safety and study outcomes,
  • recent lower-limb surgery (\<12 months),
  • polypharmacy (use of more than four medications) or fall-risk increasing drugs,
  • significant sensory impairments limiting assessment,
  • immune-related conditions or recent infections,
  • to MRI,
  • hospitalization within the past 30 days,
  • participation in another clinical study,
  • unable or unwilling to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Prior Fall History

    Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who experienced at least one fall during the 12 months before enrollment. Participants undergo the same multimodal baseline assessments and 12-month prospective fall monitoring as the other cohort. No intervention is assigned.

  • No Prior Fall History

    Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who experienced no falls during the 12 months before enrollment. Participants undergo the same multimodal baseline assessments and 12-month prospective fall monitoring as the other cohort. No intervention is assigned.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stable Candidate Multimodal Biomarkers Discriminating Participants With and Without Prior Falls

    The outcome will be the number and identity of stable candidate biomarkers that discriminate participants who experienced at least one fall during the previous 12 months from participants who experienced no falls during that period.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Predictive Performance of Baseline Biomarkers for Incident Falls

    The ability of baseline biomarkers retained by the stability-selection procedure to predict at least one incident fall during prospective follow-up will be evaluated. Predictive performance will be reported using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity, each with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: From completion of baseline assessments through 12 months of prospective follow-up

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be made available through a publicly accessible data repository after completion of the study and publication of the main results, subject to institutional, ethical, and data protection requirements. Genetic and genomic individual participant data will not be made publicly available because of privacy, ethical, and data protection considerations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Sep 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 7, 2026
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07804771
Lead sponsor
Slb Pharma
Collaborators
Université de Caen Normandie
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Study contacts

Antoine Langeard, PhD
Contact
antoine.langeard@unicaen.fr
+332 31 56 82 24

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion