ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07801989AK ACE-PATHUpdated Sep 3, 2026

Alaska Alliance for Community Engagement Phase II: Partnership for Action Toward Health

A Phase 1 interventional study of Tools for Arctic Health Promotion in Chronic Disease, Mental Health and Caridovascular Disease, sponsored by University of Alaska Fairbanks. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by University of Alaska Fairbanks · Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
360
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The AK ACE-PATH Phase II study aims to pilot and implement a novel intervention, Tools for Arctic Health Promotion (TAHP), to address Alaska Native (AN) community priorities related to local health and community-level resilience.

Read the detailed description

In Phase I of AK ACE, community partners identified and prioritized local stressors through a consensus-based process. Building on these findings, Phase II will implement interventions targeting the highest-priority stressors through modules designed to improve health outcomes.This study addresses a critical gap in understanding local health and mental health among AN populations facing rapid social change and overlapping public health challenges. The project focuses on developing community-driven solutions to improve physiological and mental health, particularly among youth, and to prevent chronic disease across the lifespan in rural Alaska. To achieve these goals, the study will develop and implement Tools for Arctic Health Promotion (TAHP), a novel intervention integrating data-driven tools and evidence-based community strategies. TAHP will support structured community engagement and deliver manualized health activities to approximately 410 adults and youth across five rural AN communities. The TAHP intervention will be evaluated through a feasibility pilot in one community and a paired dynamic waitlisted design (DWLD) across four additional communities. Behavioral and biological measures will assess individual- and community-level impacts on chronic disease prevention and mental health promotion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Disease
  • Mental Health
  • Caridovascular Disease
  • Stress
  • Adolescent Health

Keywords

  • Alaska Native
  • rural health
  • prevention
  • chronic disease
  • extreme weather
  • community resilience
03

In context

Chronic Disease

781 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Disease; 144 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 360 is above the median of 140 across 582 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Disease.

Browse Chronic Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alaska Fairbanks is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-identify as a permanent resident of the study community
  • Be a youth between the ages of 12-17 years or an adult 18+
  • Be able to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not have permanent residence in the community or has lived in the community less than 5 years
  • Is unable to provide written
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
360 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Enrollment in TAHP

    The study will enroll 360 participants from four unique community settings to receive the TAHP intervention. The study design will make use of a dynamic wait-listed design (DWLD) with 360 participants assessed with behavioral and community-level measures at four time points: baseline (B), intervention midpoint (T1), Intervention end (T2) and 12-month follow-up (T3).

    Behavioral: Tools for Arctic Health Promotion

Interventions

  • BehavioralTools for Arctic Health Promotion

    The TAHP intervention will utilize a valid measure of rural AN community-level protective factors (Allen, et al., 2025), and an evidence-based toolkit containing strategies proven to increase mental health and well-being in rural AN communities (Allen, Charles, et al., 2023). A formalized community engaged process will generate new intervention activities that integrate cutting-edge science to address local health priorities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceived Stress Scale Questionnaire will measure individual-level indicators of stress that we hypothesize will decrease over time with intervention participation

    The NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale is a standardized tool designed to assess how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded individuals feel in their lives. We will analyze how individual stress indicators are mitigated over time by intervention participation.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  2. General Life Satisfaction Scale will measure individual level indicators of life satisfaction that we hypothesize will increase with intervention participation

    The NIH Toolbox General Life Satisfaction Scale is a tool designed to assess an individual's cognitive evaluation of their life experiences and overall satisfaction. We will assess how the intervention mitigates life satisfaction with individuals who participate.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  3. We will assess if depression decreases with intervention participation using the PHQ-9 Questionnaire

    The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) measures the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks. We will assess how the intervention impacts depressive symptoms with individual participation.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  4. We will assess if anxiety symptoms decrease with intervention participation using the GAD-7

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Screener will be given at every time point to assess how the intervention mitigates anxiety with individual participants

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  5. We will assess if food security increases using the food security index from the PhenX Toolkit

    The PhenX Toolkit includes standardized measures for assessing food security, which is crucial for understanding social determinants of health. We will use items from the standardized food security tools to evaluate how food access impacts health outcomes and if food security increases with individual participation in the intervention.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  6. We will assess if cultural efficacy increases with individual intervention participation using the Cultural Efficacy Scale.

    The Cultural Efficacy Scale developed by Gonzalez, Sittner, and Walls in 2022 measures individuals' comfort and access to cultural and traditional resources, particularly within Indigenous communities. This scale consists of 7-8 items, each with a range of response options from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." We will analyze the data to link cultural efficacy with mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety), highlighting the protective effects of engagement in the intervention.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  7. We will assess how the intervention increases individual protective factors using the Multi-Cultural Mastery Scale

    The Multicultural Mastery Scale, developed by Allen and Mohatt, assesses coping strategies through self-mastery and communal mastery dimensions. It includes subscales that differentiate between mastery related to family and friends, highlighting the importance of social networks. We will utilize data from this scale to determine how the intervention increases positive coping and builds social networks connections in individuals who participate.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  8. We will assess how intervention participation increases social and cultural connectedness using the Awareness of Connectedness Scale

    The Awareness of Connectedness Scale (ACS), developed by Mohatt and Fok, measures an individual's awareness of their interrelatedness with family, community, and the natural environment. This scale is particularly focused on cultural aspects of wellness and healing among Alaska Native people, providing insights into their social and ecological connections. We will utilize data from the scale to assess the intervention impacts on building connectedness among individual participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

  9. We will assess how the intervention increases reasons for life and meaning and purpose using the Reasons for Life Scale

    The Reasons for Life Scale (RFL), developed by Allen and Rasmus, focuses on cultural strengths and protective factors against suicide, particularly among Alaska Native people. It emphasizes resilience, cultural teachings, and community recognition as vital components in promoting mental health and preventing suicide. We will utilize data from scale to assess how the intervention promotes reasons for life and associates with mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety) in individuals who participate in activities.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. We will assess the increase in community-level factors that are protective and contribute to health outcomes using the Protective Community Scale

    The Protective Community Scale (PCS), developed by Wexler, Allen, and Rasmus, aims to identify community-level protective factors that can reduce suicide risk among Alaska Native youth. This scale is part of a broader effort to enhance resilience in these communities through culturally relevant measures and community engagement. We will analyze data from the PCS to determine if the intervention has mitigated environmental stressors and increased community protection.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

Other outcomes

  1. We will assess changes to a stress biomarker, cortisol, using Salimetrics OnTimePoint SalivaTM Collection Management application system.

    To measure the impacts of our intervention on biological outcomes, we will assess biomarkers associated with allostatic load - cortisol as an indicator of physiological stress response. These biomarkers will allow us to evaluate whether participation in the intervention is associated with reduced chronic stress burden and improved mental health (anxiety and depression) over time. Our proposed saliva collection protocol will involve our research team members administering the saliva kits with youth and adult participants over a 3-day period with multiple tests to capture cortisol levels throughout the day. Multi-day cortisol levels will be averaged to determine a baseline, and the same process will be used for saliva collection and measurement of cortisol levels at each time point.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Allen J, Charles B, Fok CCT, Lee K, Grogan-Kaylor A; Qungasvik Team; Rasmus S. Culturally grounded strategies for suicide and alcohol risk prevention delivered by rural Alaska Native communities: A dynamic wait-listed design evaluation of the Qungasvik intervention. Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Mar;71(1-2):184-197. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12621. Epub 2022 Oct 10. PubMed 36214726 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 25 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 25, 2026
First posted
Sep 3, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 21, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2029
Last update
Sep 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07801989
Lead sponsor
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 3, 2026
Start date
Sep 21, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Stacy Rasmus, PhD
Contact
smrasmus@alaska.edu
907-328-8919
Hannah Robinson, MPH
Contact
hrobinson3@alaska.edu
731-400-3539

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion