ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07796399Updated Sep 1, 2026

Comparing Suprascapular Nerve Block and Interscalene Block for Post-thoracotomy Pain in Pediatric Patients.

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Interscalene brachial plexus block and anterior Supraclavicular nerve block in Nerve Block/Methods, sponsored by Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357 · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine which regional block provides superior analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does one block technique provide better pain relief?
  • Does the choice of block reduce opioid requirements and complication rates? Researchers will compare two block techniques to see if one offers an effective opioid-sparing strategy that improves patient comfort and reduces side effects.

Participants will:

  • Receive one of the studied block interventions during thoracic surgery.
  • Be monitored for postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and any complications.
Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of two regional analgesic techniques-suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB)-for managing ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) following pediatric thoracotomy. ISP is a common and distressing postoperative complication, affecting 30-85% of thoracotomy patients, and is often poorly responsive to systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia due to its referred pain origin via the phrenic and suprascapular nerves.

Identifying effective targeted analgesic strategies is therefore clinically important. The study will be conducted at Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 and will include 126 pediatric patients (5-18 years, ASA II-III) undergoing elective open thoracotomy.

Participants will be randomized into three groups:

  • Thoracic epidural analgesia plus interscalene block.
  • Thoracic epidural analgesia plus suprascapular nerve block.
  • Thoracic epidural analgesia alone (control). Ultrasound-guided regional blocks will be administered using 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum 2 mg/kg) on the operative side. Postoperative pain scores will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours, alongside total opioid consumption and adverse event monitoring.

The primary objective is to compare the analgesic efficacy of SSNB and ISB in reducing ISP after thoracotomy, while secondary outcomes include postoperative opioid requirements and complication rates. This study is significant because it addresses a persistent clinical challenge in pediatric thoracic surgery pain management. By identifying an effective opioid-sparing regional analgesic technique, the findings may improve postoperative comfort, reduce opioid-related side effects, enhance recovery, and inform evidence-based postoperative pain management protocols for pediatric thoracotomy patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nerve Block/Methods

Keywords

  • Post-Thoracotomy Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain
  • Suprascapular Nerve Block
  • Interscalene block
  • Regional Analgesia
  • postoperative opioid consumption
  • Nerve block
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357 is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • II-III
  • Elective open thoracotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing shoulder pathology
  • Coagulopathy or infection at injection site
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Neurological disorders involving upper limb
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    group A

    Thoracic epidural analgesia + Interscalene brachial plexus block; will be done pre-emptive after induction of anesthesia with 0.25% bupivacaine with maximum dose of 2mg/kg.

    Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block

  • Experimental
    group B

    Thoracic epidural analgesia + anterior supraclavicular nerve block will be done pre-emptive after induction of anesthesia with 0.25% bupivacaine with maximum dose of 2mg/kg.

    Procedure: anterior Supraclavicular nerve block

  • Other
    group C

    Thoracic epidural analgesia only. Control group

    Other: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) only

Interventions

  • ProcedureInterscalene brachial plexus block

    regional anesthesia technique performed at the level of the upper trunks of the brachial plexus to provide pain relief and anesthesia for surgeries involving the shoulder, clavicle, and upper arm. It is commonly used in orthopedic and thoracic procedures where shoulder pain is significant.

  • Procedureanterior Supraclavicular nerve block

    is a regional anesthesia technique targeting the trunks of the brachial plexus just above the clavicle, providing rapid and dense anesthesia for surgeries of the upper limb below the shoulder. It is often referred to as the "spinal of the arm" because of its effectiveness in numbing the arm quickly.

  • OtherThoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) only

    Control- standard treatment. A regional anesthesia technique in which a local anesthetic (sometimes combined with opioids) is injected into the epidural space of the thoracic spine to block nerve transmission and provide pain relief.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS score)

    VAS is a tool used to measure the intensity of pain or other subjective experiences. It is a 10-centimeter line, one end represents "no pain" (0), and the other end represents "worst imaginable pain" (10). The patient marks a point on the line that reflects their pain level. The score is then measured in centimeters or millimeters from the "no pain" end, giving a numerical value. Scores are collected at multiple intervals (2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours). This approach accounts for the repeated measurements and evaluates the interaction between the intervention groups and time. 0 = No pain 1-3 = Mild pain 4-6 = Moderate pain 7-9 = Severe pain 10 = Worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: Multiple intervals (2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total postoperative opioid consumption

    Total postoperative opioid consumption will be compared across the three groups using a One-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on the distribution of the data. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons will be conducted using Tukey's HSD or Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction to identify specific group differences.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative

  2. Incidence of adverse effects

    The incidence of adverse effects will be compared using the Chi-square test, which is a statistical method used to compare the incidence (frequency or proportion) of categorical outcomes across groups.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2028, 21 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 9, 2026
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
StartActual
Jul 9, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 9, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 9, 2028
Last update
Sep 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07796399
Lead sponsor
Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357
Responsible party
suzan mohamed adlan (Consultant Anesthesiologist, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
Start date
Jul 9, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 9, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 9, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Study contacts

Nancy Ashraf Abdellatif
Contact
nancy.ashraf@57357.com
+21141083507
Dina Elgalaly
Contact
dina.elgalaly@57357.org
+0201154021119
Suzan Adlan Khedr
principal investigator · Children's cancer hospital 57357

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion