ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07783997Updated Aug 27, 2026

Thrower's Ten Versus Conventional Conditioning in Amateur Discus Throwers

An observational study in Health Adult Subjects, sponsored by Saveetha University. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-27.

Sponsored by Saveetha University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
32
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This retrospective observational study compares the association of Thrower's Ten training and conventional conditioning with throwing performance and shoulder muscle strength in amateur male discus throwers. The study uses previously completed training and performance records from athletes who participated in one of two conditioning programmes. Throwing distance and shoulder muscle strength were assessed at baseline, during the training period, and at the end of the training period. The primary outcome is change in discus-throwing distance. Secondary outcomes include changes in shoulder muscle strength. The study aims to determine whether athletes who participated in the Thrower's Ten programme showed different changes in throwing performance and shoulder strength compared with athletes who participated in conventional conditioning.

Read the detailed description

This is a retrospective observational comparative study evaluating previously completed training records of amateur male discus throwers. The study compares athletes who participated in a Thrower's Ten-based conditioning programme with athletes who participated in conventional conditioning. Participant allocation to the training programmes was not performed prospectively according to a research randomization protocol; programme assignment was primarily related to scheduling and facility availability.

The analysis includes athletes for whom complete records were available for the relevant assessment time points. The primary outcome is discus-throwing distance. Secondary outcomes comprise shoulder muscle strength measured using manual muscle testing. Outcome assessments were available at baseline and subsequent assessment points during the training period, including the end-of-training assessment.

The primary analysis evaluates differences in the pattern of change over time between the two training groups using a mixed-design analysis of variance, with the time-by-group interaction representing the principal longitudinal comparison. Multiple outcomes were considered and a Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold was applied. Difference-in-change estimates and confidence intervals were also calculated. Exploratory covariate-adjusted sensitivity analyses were performed for selected outcomes.

Because the study is based on previously completed records, the findings represent associations between participation in the respective training programmes and changes in throwing performance and shoulder strength. The study does not establish that the Thrower's Ten exercise content alone caused the observed differences. Differences in programme progression and unmeasured training factors, including throwing volume, may have contributed to the observed results.

The study is intended to provide preliminary evidence regarding the relationship between a structured Thrower's Ten-based conditioning programme and performance-related outcomes in amateur male discus throwers and to inform future prospective controlled studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Health Adult Subjects

Keywords

  • Thrower's Ten
  • Discus Throwing
  • Shoulder Muscle Strength
  • Throwing Performance
  • Conventional Conditioning
  • Strength Training
  • Sports Conditioning
  • Amateur Athletes
  • Shoulder Strength
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Saveetha University is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Amateur male discus throwers aged 18-25 years whose previously completed training and performance records were available for retrospective analysis. Participants belonged to either the Thrower's Ten conditioning cohort or the conventional conditioning cohort.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male amateur discus throwers aged 18-25 years.
  • Participants who participated in either the Thrower's Ten conditioning programme or the conventional conditioning programme.
  • Participants with the required baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 outcome records available for analysis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with incomplete outcome records required for the analysis.
  • Participants who did not complete the required training programme or assessment schedule.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Thrower's Ten Conditioning Group

    Amateur male discus throwers who participated in the Thrower's Ten-based conditioning programme. The cohort was identified retrospectively from previously completed training records. Outcomes included discus-throwing distance and shoulder muscle strength assessed at the available study time points.

    Behavioral: Thrower's Ten exercise program

  • Conventional Conditioning Group

    Amateur male discus throwers who participated in the conventional conditioning programme. The cohort was identified retrospectively from previously completed training records. Outcomes included discus-throwing distance and shoulder muscle strength assessed at the available study time points.

    Behavioral: Conventional conditioning program

Interventions

  • BehavioralThrower's Ten exercise program

    An 8-week Thrower's Ten conditioning program for amateur male discus throwers, consisting of supervised shoulder strengthening and flexibility exercises performed 3 sessions per week for 30 minutes per session. The program was based on the Thrower's Ten exercise series and incorporated progressive resistance during the training period. The program was administered as part of the athletes' routine conditioning.

  • BehavioralConventional conditioning program

    An 8-week conventional conditioning program consisting of shoulder strengthening and flexibility exercises, including prone horizontal abduction, horizontal abduction at 90° external rotation, side-lying external rotation, standing row, military press, towel stretch, crossover arm stretch, and sleeper stretch. Training was performed 3 sessions per week for 30 minutes per session. Progression in the conventional cohort was determined at the discretion of the trainer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Discus-Throwing Distance

    Discus-throwing distance measured in metres. Athletes performed three legal discus throws following a standardised warm-up, with 1-2 minutes of rest between attempts. The longest valid throw was recorded. Two trained evaluators independently identified the initial ground-contact point and measured the throwing distance using a standard measuring tape.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Isometric Shoulder Flexor Muscle Strength

    Isometric shoulder flexor muscle strength measured using the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST). Strength was assessed by a trained assessor and recorded in mmHg.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8

  2. Isometric Shoulder Extensor Muscle Strength

    Isometric shoulder extensor muscle strength measured using the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST). Strength was assessed by a trained assessor and recorded in mmHg.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8

  3. Isometric Shoulder Abductor Muscle Strength

    Isometric shoulder abductor muscle strength measured using the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST). Strength was assessed by a trained assessor and recorded in mmHg.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8

  4. Isometric Shoulder Internal Rotator Muscle Strength

    Isometric shoulder internal rotator muscle strength measured using the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST). Strength was assessed by a trained assessor and recorded in mmHg.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8

  5. Isometric Shoulder External Rotator Muscle Strength

    Isometric shoulder external rotator muscle strength measured using the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST). Strength was assessed by a trained assessor and recorded in mmHg.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Saveetha Medical College and Hospital [SMCH]
    Chennai, Tamil Nadu 602105, India
08

References and documents

Publications

  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296. PubMed 17941714 ↗
  • Souza LA, Martins JC, Moura JB, Teixeira-Salmela LF, De Paula FV, Faria CD. Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values? Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Mar-Apr;18(2):191-200. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000149. PubMed 24839045 ↗
  • Brito SAF, Santana MM, Benfica PDA, Aguiar LT, Gomes GC, Faria CDCM. The modified sphygmomanometer test for assessment of muscle strength of community-dwelling older adults in clinical practice: reliability and validity. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(1):131-138. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1758804. Epub 2020 May 12. PubMed 32393131 ↗
  • Zaras N, Stasinaki AN, Terzis G. Biological Determinants of Track and Field Throwing Performance. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 May 7;6(2):40. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6020040. PubMed 34067149 ↗
  • Leigh S, Yu B. The associations of selected technical parameters with discus throwing performance: a cross-sectional study. Sports Biomech. 2007 Sep;6(3):269-84. doi: 10.1080/14763140701489744. PubMed 17933192 ↗
  • Bartlett RM. The biomechanics of the discus throw: a review. J Sports Sci. 1992 Oct;10(5):467-510. doi: 10.1080/02640419208729944. PubMed 1433463 ↗
  • Gokalp O, Kirmizigil B. Effects of Thrower's Ten exercises on upper extremity performance: A randomized controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22837. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022837. PubMed 33080765 ↗
  • Wilk KE, Yenchak AJ, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. The Advanced Throwers Ten Exercise Program: a new exercise series for enhanced dynamic shoulder control in the overhead throwing athlete. Phys Sportsmed. 2011 Nov;39(4):90-7. doi: 10.3810/psm.2011.11.1943. PubMed 22293772 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant-level data will not be shared publicly because the study involves retrospective analysis of participant records and sharing individual-level data may compromise participant confidentiality and privacy. De-identified aggregate results are reported in the manuscript. Data may be made available in accordance with institutional policies and applicable ethical and data-protection requirements upon reasonable request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2025 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 0 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 19, 2026
First posted
Aug 25, 2026
StartActual
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Sep 27, 2025
CompletionActual
Oct 20, 2025
Last update
Aug 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07783997
Lead sponsor
Saveetha University
Responsible party
Mohamed Sahal (Principal Investigator, Saveetha University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 25, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 27, 2025
Completion
Oct 20, 2025
Last update
Aug 27, 2026

Study contacts

Shenbaga Sundaram Subramanian
principal investigator · Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion