ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07782749VIRTUAL RIABUpdated Aug 25, 2026

Virtual Reality-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

An interventional study of Virtual Reality in Cardiac Rehabilitation, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled study will evaluate whether adding immersive virtual reality (VR) to cardiac rehabilitation can improve participation in rehabilitation and other health outcomes in patients who have recently undergone cardiac surgery.

Cardiac rehabilitation is recommended after cardiac surgery to support recovery, improve physical function and quality of life, and reduce complications related to physical inactivity. However, some patients have difficulty completing the recommended rehabilitation program. Immersive VR may make exercise sessions more engaging and may help patients participate more consistently in their rehabilitation.

The study will enroll 46 adult patients who have undergone cardiac surgery within the previous 30 days, are clinically stable, and have an indication for cardiac rehabilitation. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an immersive VR group or a standard cardiac rehabilitation group.

Participants in both groups will complete the same supervised cardiac rehabilitation program, consisting of eight moderate-intensity exercise sessions performed on a treadmill or stationary bicycle. Each session will last approximately 30 minutes and will be performed twice a week for four weeks.

Participants assigned to the VR group will perform their rehabilitation sessions while wearing an immersive VR headset. The headset will provide natural audiovisual environments designed to create an immersive experience during exercise. A trained healthcare professional will assist participants with the technology and supervise them throughout each session. Participants will be able to stop the VR experience at any time if needed. Participants assigned to the control group will complete the same rehabilitation program without VR.

The primary outcome of the study is adherence to cardiac rehabilitation, measured as the percentage of scheduled rehabilitation sessions completed.

Secondary outcomes will assess changes from baseline to the end of the rehabilitation program in functional capacity using the 6-minute walk test, perceived exertion using the Borg scale, angina severity, cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and health-related quality of life using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

In the VR group, symptoms potentially related to VR exposure, known as cybersickness, will be assessed after each session using the Virtual Reality Symptom Questionnaire. At the end of the program, participants in the VR group will also be invited to take part in a semi-structured interview about their experience with virtual reality.

The study aims to determine whether immersive VR can be a useful approach to support participation in cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac surgery while also evaluating its effects on physical, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Virtual Reality
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age over 18 years;
  • a clinically stable cardiovascular diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • conditions precluding physical exercise (e.g., bone fractures);
  • conditions precluding the use of virtual reality (e.g., blindness and deafness);
  • severe cognitive impairment, documented by a score of 0 to 4 on the Six-Item Screener;
  • end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis;
  • established advanced pulmonary disease;
  • active ;
  • rheumatic diseases.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality arm

    We will use the latest generation of high-quality immersive virtual reality (VR) technology, featuring high integrated computing power, standalone operation, sophisticated software, and advanced optical components, thereby ensuring low latency and a wide field of view. The virtual scenarios selected will consist of natural environments, as interaction with such settings has been shown to provide a highly effective form of distraction. To further enhance the immersive experience, auditory sensory stimulation will also be incorporated.The selected audio content will consist of natural sounds and will be delivered directly through the headset in high-definition stereo to provide a fully immersive audiovisual experience. Devices that meet these requirements while offering a favorable cost-effectiveness profile include the PICO 4® headset and the TREADMILL XR® application. VR will be administered during the 30-minute cardiac rehabilitation (CR) session, under the supervision.

    Device: Virtual Reality

  • No intervention
    Standard Care arm

    Patients in the control group will undergo cardiac rehabilitation on a treadmill or stationary bicycle under the supervision of healthcare professionals, following the same guidelines as the intervention group in terms of the number of sessions, session duration, and exercise intensity, but without the use of virtual reality.

Interventions

  • DeviceVirtual Reality

    Participants assigned to the intervention group will undergo cardiac rehabilitation while using immersive virtual reality. During each cardiac rehabilitation session, participants will wear an immersive virtual reality headset providing high-quality three-dimensional natural environments combined with natural high-definition stereo audio to enhance the immersive audiovisual experience. The virtual reality system may include the PICO 4® headset and the TREADMILL XR® application. Virtual reality will be provided throughout the 30-minute rehabilitation session under the supervision of a healthcare professional trained in virtual reality technology. Before the first session, participants will receive approximately 10 minutes of instruction and demonstration on the use of the virtual reality equipment. During the sessions, participants will be allowed to freely move their eyes and head, adjust the audio volume, and discontinue virtual reality at any time.

    Also known as: Immersive Virtual Reality, Virtual Reality-Assisted Cardiac Rehabilitation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence

    Cardiac rehabilitation adherence will be measured as the percentage of scheduled rehabilitation sessions completed by each participant. Adherence will be calculated as the number of completed sessions divided by the total number of eight scheduled sessions, multiplied by 100. Higher percentages indicate greater adherence.

    Time frame: At completion of the 4-week cardiac rehabilitation program (after the eighth session)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test Distance at 4 Weeks

    Functional capacity will be assessed using the Six-Minute Walk Test. Participants will be instructed to walk at their own pace for 6 minutes on a flat, hard surface and to cover the greatest possible distance. The outcome will be the total distance walked, expressed in meters. A greater distance indicates better functional capacity

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session)

  2. Change from Baseline in Rating of Perceived Exertion at 4 Weeks

    Perceived exertion will be assessed using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale. The scale ranges from 6 to 20, where 6 corresponds to no exertion and 20 corresponds to maximal exertion. The Borg score will be recorded at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  3. Change from Baseline in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Class at 4 Weeks

    Angina severity will be assessed using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification of angina pectoris. The classification ranges from Class I, indicating no limitation of ordinary physical activity, to Class IV, indicating inability to perform physical activity without discomfort. Higher classes indicate greater functional limitation due to angina.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session)

  4. Change from Baseline in Metabolic Equivalents During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing at 4 Weeks

    Exercise capacity will be assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Metabolic equivalents will be recorded during cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  5. Change from Baseline in Exercise Workload Capacity During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing at 4 Weeks

    Exercise workload capacity will be assessed during cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program. The workload achieved during testing will be compared between the two assessment time points.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  6. Occurrence of Exercise-Induced Arrhythmias During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

    The presence or absence of exercise-induced arrhythmias will be assessed during cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  7. Change from Baseline in Heart Rate at 4 Weeks

    Heart rate will be measured using a digital monitor at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  8. Change from Baseline in Peripheral Oxygen Saturation at 4 Weeks

    Peripheral oxygen saturation will be measured using a digital monitor at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program and will be expressed as a percentage.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  9. Change from Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at 4 Weeks

    Systolic Blood Pressure will be measured using a digital monitor at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  10. Change from Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at 4 Weeks

    Diastolic Blood Pressure will be measured using a digital monitor at baseline and after completion of the cardiac rehabilitation program.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at 4 Weeks

  11. Change from Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score at 4 Weeks

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. The questionnaire evaluates physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy, and quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (after the eighth rehabilitation session).

  12. Virtual Reality-Related Cybersickness

    Cybersickness will be assessed in participants assigned to the virtual reality group using the 13-item Virtual Reality Symptom Questionnaire (VRSQ). The questionnaire comprises 8 non-ocular and 5 ocular symptoms. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates no symptoms, 1-2 slight symptoms, 3-4 moderate symptoms, and 5-6 severe symptoms. Item scores will be summed to obtain a total VRSQ score ranging from 0 to 78, with higher scores indicating greater severity of virtual reality-related symptoms. Non-ocular and ocular subscores range from 0 to 48 and 0 to 30, respectively.

    Time frame: Immediately after each of the eight virtual reality sessions, over 4 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weech S, Kenny S, Barnett-Cowan M. Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Are Negatively Related: A Review. Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;10:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00158. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30778320 ↗
  • Sanches EE, Aupers E, Sakran N, Navalta J, Kostka T, Pouwels S. Barriers and Facilitators in Rehabilitation in Chronic Diseases and After Surgery: Is It a Matter of Adherence? Cureus. 2021 Dec 5;13(12):e20173. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20173. eCollection 2021 Dec. PubMed 35003999 ↗
  • Ruano-Ravina A, Pena-Gil C, Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras S, van 't Hof A, Meindersma E, Bossano Prescott EI, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR. Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:436-443. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.120. Epub 2016 Aug 13. PubMed 27557484 ↗
  • Resurreccion DM, Moreno-Peral P, Gomez-Herranz M, Rubio-Valera M, Pastor L, Caldas de Almeida JM, Motrico E. Factors associated with non-participation in and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Jan;18(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/1474515118783157. Epub 2018 Jun 18. PubMed 29909641 ↗
  • Milojevic M, Freemantle N, Hayanga JWA, Kelly RF, Myers PO, Petersen RH, Opitz I, Sabik JF 3rd, Bakaeen FG. Harmonizing guidelines and other clinical practice documents: A joint comprehensive methodology manual by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;169(1):170-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.048. Epub 2024 Oct 10. No abstract available. PubMed 39387731 ↗
  • Micheluzzi V, Casu G, Sanna GD, Canu A, Iovino P, Caggianelli G, Vellone E. Improving adherence to rehabilitation for heart failure patients through immersive virtual reality (VIRTUAL-HF): A protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Mar;138:107463. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107463. Epub 2024 Jan 30. PubMed 38302011 ↗
  • Burrai F, De Marinis MG, Piredda M. Virtual Reality During Chemotherapy Infusion: An Innovative Intervention in Holistic Nursing Practice. Holist Nurs Pract. 2024 Jul-Aug 01;38(4):220-226. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000616. Epub 2024 Jun 19. PubMed 37585475 ↗
  • Ball L, Costantino F, Orefice G, Chandrapatham K, Pelosi P. Intraoperative mechanical ventilation: state of the art. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Oct;83(10):1075-1088. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11970-X. Epub 2017 May 19. PubMed 28528537 ↗
  • Ames SL, Wolffsohn JS, McBrien NA. The development of a symptom questionnaire for assessing virtual reality viewing using a head-mounted display. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Mar;82(3):168-76. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000156307.95086.6. PubMed 15767873 ↗
  • Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corra U, Davos CH, Hansen D, Frederix I, Iliou MC, Pedretti RFE, Schmid JP, Vigorito C, Voller H, Wilhelm M, Piepoli MF, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Berger T, Cohen-Solal A, Cornelissen V, Dendale P, Doehner W, Gaita D, Gevaert AB, Kemps H, Kraenkel N, Laukkanen J, Mendes M, Niebauer J, Simonenko M, Zwisler AO. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 May 14;28(5):460-495. doi: 10.1177/2047487320913379. PubMed 33611446 ↗
  • Almashrafi A, Elmontsri M, Aylin P. Systematic review of factors influencing length of stay in ICU after adult cardiac surgery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 29;16:318. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1591-3. PubMed 27473872 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Aug 2029, 35 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2026
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 30, 2029
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2029
Last update
Aug 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07782749
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari
Responsible party
Valentina Micheluzzi (Principal Investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Valentina Micheluzzi, PhD
Contact
valentina.micheluzzi@aousassari.it
+ 39 3401753630
Valentina Micheluzzi, PhD
principal investigator · Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion