An observational study in STEMI - ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Chest Pain, sponsored by Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.
Sponsored by Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia · Observational
The main symptom that initiates the diagnostic and therapeutic process for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome is chest pain. Based on a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), patients can be diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which requires immediate medical treatment. Recently, wearable devices like smartwatches with ECG capabilities have opened new pathways for cardiac triage, but their diagnostic precision and technical viability in a real, unselected Emergency Department setting need to be confirmed.
The primary objective of this prospective, observational study is to compare the diagnostic capacity of a 9-lead ECG obtained with a smartwatch against the standard 12-lead ECG for diagnosing STEMI in patients consulting for chest pain.
During the study, patients evaluated by the on-call cardiologist for ischemic chest pain will undergo their standard care. In addition to the standard 12-lead ECG, a 9-lead ECG will be sequentially recorded using a smartwatch. This is an observational study, meaning the smartwatch recording will not cause any delay in clinical action or negatively impact the patient's standard treatment.
Specifically, the study aims to:
Background and Rationale:
The clinical spectrum of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is broad, with chest pain being the primary symptom initiating the diagnostic and therapeutic cascade. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), immediate reperfusion -primarily via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-is crucial. While primary PCI has significantly reduced mortality, minimizing systemic delays remains vital.
Recently, wearable devices with electrocardiographic (ECG) capabilities have emerged as potential tools for ultra-early cardiac triage. Previous research, such as the SMARTAMI study, demonstrated that a sequential 9-lead smartwatch ECG has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting STEMI. However, these prior studies often compared confirmed myocardial infarction cases with healthy, asymptomatic cohorts in highly controlled environments. There is a critical need to validate the technical feasibility, signal quality, and diagnostic accuracy of this technology in a real-world Emergency Department (ED) setting with unselected patients, where factors like diaphoresis, acute pain, and time urgency complicate the recording process.
Study Design and Clinical Procedures:
This is a prospective, observational diagnostic validation and concordance study conducted in a real-world clinical setting. Patients evaluated by the on-call cardiologist for ischemic-profile chest pain will be consecutively enrolled. The study is purely observational; obtaining the smartwatch ECG will not delay standard clinical care, and standard medical management will remain unaltered.
Following standard protocols, an analog sequential 9-lead ECG (I, II, III, V1-V6) will be recorded using a smartwatch alongside the standard 12-lead ECG.
Blinding and Data Evaluation:
A rigorous double-blind, independent analysis will be performed. The on-call cardiologists responsible for acquiring the tracings in the ED will not participate in their interpretation. Both the standard 12-lead ECGs and the smartwatch ECGs will be completely anonymized using unique alphanumeric codes. Subsequently, independent expert cardiologists will blindly evaluate the tracings, classifying them as "STEMI" or "non-STEMI" without any knowledge of the patient's clinical data or the origin of each specific recording.
Statistical Approach and Sample Size:
Based on prior literature in controlled settings reporting a 93% sensitivity, this real-world study conservatively estimates an 85% expected sensitivity due to ED-specific variables (e.g., signal noise, diaphoresis). To achieve a 10% margin of error with a 95% confidence level, a sample size of 49 confirmed STEMI positive cases is required. Consecutive recruitment will continue uninterrupted until this target is reached. Patients enrolled during this period who are ultimately diagnosed as "non-STEMI" will be retained in the database to calculate the specificity of the device.
388 studies on the registry are indexed under Chest Pain; 64 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 489 across 167 observational studies indexed under Chest Pain.
Browse Chest Pain studies →Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population consists of unselected patients presenting to the Emergency Department at Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía (Cartagena) who are evaluated by the on-call cardiologist for ischemic-profile chest pain. This represents a real-world clinical cohort in an acute setting. Patients with extreme hemodynamic instability (where an additional recording would delay critical emergency treatment) and those with baseline electrocardiogram alterations (such as prior left bundle branch block or pacemaker-mediated pacing) that preclude proper ST-segment interpretation are excluded from this population.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Diagnostic Test: ECG smartwatch recording
Recording a 9-lead ECG with a smartwatch
Smartwatch ECG records' ability to diagnose STEMI
Analyze the diagnostic agreement between expert cardiologists when blindly and independently classifying the smartwatch recordings versus the standard ECG recordings as "STEMI" or "non-STEMI".
Time frame: From enrollment to the blinded analysis at the end of the recruitment
Plan to share: Undecided
Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 6 months after the start.
Of 66 non-industry observational studies under Chest Pain, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 49. This study's planned 6 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 69 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 54.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia