ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07779785VICAUpdated Oct 26, 2026

VICA: A Virtual Care Assistant for Dementia Caregivers

An interventional study of VICA - Virtual Informal Care Assistant and Education only BPSD mobile app in Alzheimer Dementia (AD) and Caregiver Burden of People With Dementia, sponsored by Indiana University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Indiana University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 26, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluates the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of VICA, an AI-powered virtual care assistant that delivers evidence-based education, symptom monitoring, and coaching to informal caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Sixty caregiver-patient dyads will be randomized 1:1 to VICA or an attention-control education app (Dementia Guide Expert) for 3 months. The study will assess recruitment, VICA acceptance/usability, and engagement (Aim 1), and estimate effect sizes for reducing patient behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and caregiver distress (Aim 2).

Read the detailed description

VICA is a customized large-language-model-driven avatar that provides speech-to-speech and text conversational support grounded in the ABC (Aging Brain Care) collaborative dementia care model and the HABC-Monitor assessment. Informal caregivers randomized to VICA are encouraged to use the platform 3 times per week for approximately 20 minutes over 3 months; control participants use the Dementia Guide Expert education-only app on the same schedule. Outcomes include trial feasibility metrics (recruitment, retention, VICA acceptance via TAM-PEOU, usability via SUS, usage/engagement) and preliminary effect-size estimates for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) total score (patient BPSD), NPI-Distress score, PHQ-9 (caregiver depression), and GAD-7 (caregiver anxiety), collected at baseline and months 1, 2, and 3.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
  • Caregiver Burden of People With Dementia

Keywords

  • behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia
  • conversational AI
  • avatar
  • informal caregiver
  • digital therapeutic
  • ABC collaborative dementia care model
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 148 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Patient

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Community-dwelling
  • Diagnosed with ADRD
  • Clinical notes indicate behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) Inclusion Criteria: Informal Caregiver
  • Age ≥ 21 years
  • Self-identified informal caregiver of a community-dwelling patient diagnosed with ADRD
  • Provides ≥ 10 hours/week of care to the patient with ADRD
  • Regular access to a computer and/or smart device with internet
  • English-literate; assessed as "adequate" on the Single Item Literacy Screener

Exclusion Criteria: Patient

  • less than 6 months

Exclusion Criteria: Informal Caregiver

  • Clinician-reported cognitive impairment
  • Clinician-reported severe mental illness or substance use disorder
  • Clinician-reported life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Unable to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: VICA

    Access to the VICA AI-powered avatar platform for 3 months; caregivers encouraged to engage 3x/week for \~20 minutes per session. VICA delivers education, resource information, and symptom-monitoring (HABC-Monitor) grounded in the ABC collaborative dementia care model via a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system.

    Device: VICA - Virtual Informal Care Assistant

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator: Attention Control

    Access to Dementia Guide Expert, an existing free, education-only BPSD mobile app (ENGAGE-IL initiative, University of Illinois at Chicago), used on the same 3x/week, \~20 minute schedule for 3 months. No interactive coaching, assessment, or personalized response.

    Device: Education only BPSD mobile app

Interventions

  • DeviceVICA - Virtual Informal Care Assistant

    An AI-powered avatar delivering conversational, speech-to-speech and text-based education, resource information, and symptom-monitoring support to informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), grounded in the ABC collaborative dementia care model via a retrieval-augmented generation system.

  • DeviceEducation only BPSD mobile app

    Access to Dementia Guide Expert, an existing free, education-only BPSD mobile app (ENGAGE-IL initiative, University of Illinois at Chicago), used on the same 3x/week, \~20 minute schedule for 3 months. No interactive coaching, assessment, or personalized response.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) total score

    A 12-domain caregiver-informant-rated measure of patient behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Each domain is scored as frequency (1-4) times severity (1-3) if present, or 0 if absent. Domain scores are summed for a Total Score ranging 0-144; higher scores indicate more frequent and/or severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months

  2. Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Distress (NPI-D) Scale

    Derived from the same 12-domain NPI interview. For each domain in which a symptom is present, the caregiver rates how emotionally distressing that behavior is to them, from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very severely). Ratings are summed across domains for a total score of 0-60; higher scores indicate greater caregiver distress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months

  3. Assessment completion rate

    Time frame: Computed at 3 months

  4. Recruitment rate

    Recruitment rate computed monthly as # approached, # agreeing, and \# consenting, tracked continuously throughout the accrual period.

    Time frame: up to 15 months

  5. Technology Acceptance Model-Perceived Ease of Use (TAM-PEOU)

    A 6-item caregiver self-report measure of perceived ease of use, each item rated on a 7-point scale from Extremely Disagree to Extremely Agree. Item scores are summed for a total ranging 6-42; higher scores indicate greater perceived ease of use. Intervention-arm participants rate the VICA platform; control-arm participants rate the Dementia Guide Expert app, using parallel-worded versions of the same instrument.

    Time frame: Months 1, 2, 3

  6. System Usability Scale (SUS)

    A 10-item caregiver self-report measure of perceived usability, rated on a 5-point scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree, with alternating positively- and negatively-worded items. Using standard SUS scoring, item responses are converted and summed to a total ranging 0-100; higher scores indicate better usability. Intervention-arm participants rate the VICA platform; control-arm participants rate the Dementia Guide Expert app, using parallel-worded versions of the same instrument.

    Time frame: Months 1, 2, 3

  7. VICA usage

    Server-recorded log-ins, session progress/completion, and conversation content, collected from the VICA intervention arm only. Not applicable to the attention control arm, which does not use the VICA platform.

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    A 9-item caregiver-reported measure of depressive symptom severity. Scored 0-27; higher scores indicate more severe depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)

    A 7-item caregiver self-report measure of anxiety symptom severity, scored 0-3 per item and summed for a total ranging 0-21; higher scores indicate more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Eskanazi Health
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 7 months later.

Of 882 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Alzheimer Disease, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 959 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 26, 2026: start Aug 2026 → Nov 2026, primary completion Feb 2027 → Jun 2027 and completion May 2027 → Jun 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2026
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026was Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027was Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027was May 2027
Last update
Oct 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Aug 17, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
Oct 26, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027→Jun 30, 2027
Oct 26, 2026
Study completion
May 30, 2027→Jun 30, 2027
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    Start date Aug 17, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
    Primary completion Feb 28, 2027→Jun 30, 2027
    Study completion May 30, 2027→Jun 30, 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07779785
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
University of Notre Dame
Responsible party
MALAZ BOUSTANI (Professor of Medicine, Indiana University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Malaz Boustani, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Indiana University School of Medicine, Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion