ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07775274Updated Aug 20, 2026

Sodium Hyaluronate for Myofascial Thoracic Pain

An interventional study of Sodium Hyaluronate Injection and Saline Injections in Thoracic Pain and Back Pain, sponsored by EPC Education s.r.o.. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by EPC Education s.r.o. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine whether the addition of sodium hyaluronate to standard ultrasoundguided lidocaine injection provides superior and sustained pain relief compared with standard lidocaine injection alone in patients with suspected myofascial or nonspecific thoracic back pain.

Read the detailed description

The myofascial complex is increasingly recognized as a potential source of thoracic back pain. Sodium hyaluronate is a key component of synovial fluid and has more recently been recognized as an important element of interfascial spaces. The hypothesized mechanism of action of sodium hyaluronate differs from that of local anesthetic agents and is expected to influence outcome timing. Sodium hyaluronate is a key determinant of interfascial lubrication and viscoelastic behavior, facilitating low-friction gliding between adjacent fascial layers. Experimental and biomechanical studies suggest that alterations in sodium hyaluronate concentration or molecular organization may increase interfascial shear resistance, potentially contributing to nociceptive input through abnormal tissue strain and impaired movement patterns. Restoration of sodium hyaluronate is therefore postulated to improve fascial sliding and mechanical load distribution rather than producing immediate analgesia. Although corticosteroids are used by some clinicians as part of injection-based management of spinal and myofascial pain, they were intentionally not included in the present study. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the incremental effect of interfascial sodium hyaluronate on pain and function while minimizing pharmacological confounding and potential long-term tissue effects. This trial is designed as a superiority study evaluating the incremental benefit of sodium hyaluronate compared to normal saline added to standard lidocaine injection, which reflects current clinical practice. For this purpose, a clear, colorless, viscoelastic 1% sodium hyaluronate saline solution (10 mg/ml) in a sterile package for single use, was used. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio by computer-generated random sequence into two groups. Group 1. Interventional - (4 mL of 1% lidocaine followed by 12 mL of sodium hyaluronate) or Group 2. - control group receiving standard lidocaine injection with saline (4 mL of 1% lidocaine followed by 12 ml of normal saline). Group 2. is a control group with no sodium hyaluronate administration; however, the administration of lidocaine represents a standard procedure, so patients will not be left without treatment even in this study arm. All procedures will be performed by two experienced physicians using a standardized technique. Patients will be positioned prone in the procedure room. The transverse processes at the level corresponding to maximal tenderness will be identified using ultrasound guidance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thoracic Pain
  • Back Pain

Keywords

  • myofascial complex
  • sodium hyaluronate
  • ultrasound-guided
  • thoracic back pain
03

In context

Chest Pain

388 studies on the registry are indexed under Chest Pain; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 129 across 204 interventional studies indexed under Chest Pain.

Browse Chest Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

EPC Education s.r.o. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Thoracic back pain as the primary complaint
  • myofascial contribution, defined by at least two of the following:

    • Localized tenderness
    • Paravertebral muscle spasm
    • Trigger points
    • Reduced skin or fascial mobility
  • Persistent pain despite at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment
  • Absence of more specific causes of pain, as determined by clinical examination and additional investigations when indicated
  • Age over 18 years

Conditions to be excluded prior to enrollment include:

  • Neuropathic pain patterns, including:

    • Cervical or thoracic radicular pain
    • Intercostal neuralgia
    • Dorsal scapular neuralgia
    • Other neuralgias of thoracic region
  • Pleural pain patterns
  • Ischemic pain patterns (e.g., ischemic heart disease)
  • Predominantly postural pain associated with female sex and osteopenia suggestive of vertebral compression fractures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of written
  • Active
  • Recent trauma
  • Age > 70 years
  • Local or systemic infection
  • Presence of another more likely pain etiology
  • Severe scoliosis and/or significant chest wall deformity
  • History of thoracic or upper abdominal surgery
  • History of spinal surgery of any kind
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    4 mL of 1% lidocaine followed by 12 mL of sodium hyaluronate

    Other: Sodium Hyaluronate Injection

  • Active comparator
    Group 2

    4 mL of 1% lidocaine followed by 12 mL of normal saline

    Other: Saline Injections

Interventions

  • OtherSodium Hyaluronate Injection

    Sodium hyaluronate injections added to standard lidocaine injection.

  • OtherSaline Injections

    Normal saline added to standard lidocaine injection, which reflects current clinical practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain

    Scale 0-10; 0 refers to no pain, while 10 refers to worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. EQ-5D standardized questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life

    EQ index, Scale from 0 (state equivalent to death) to 1 (full health); Scale 0 - 100, where 0 (state equivalent to death) and 100 (full health)

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months

  2. Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) Assessment

    Scale 0 - 10; where 0 (no pain and no limitations) and 10 (worst imaginable pain, no life enjoyment and total limitation in general activities)

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months

  3. Global Rating of Change (GRC)

    Retrospective assessment of condition change compared to the initial state; scale -5 to 5; where -5 (significant worsening), 0 (state unchanged), 5 (significant improvement)

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07775274
Lead sponsor
EPC Education s.r.o.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Start date
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 20, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Michal Matias, MD, FIPP
Contact
matias@europainclinics.com
+420602246127

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion