ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07773298Updated Aug 19, 2026

Emotional Freedom Technique for Perceived Traumatic Childbirth

An interventional study of Emotional Freedom Technique in Perceived Traumatic Childbirth, sponsored by Ümmügülsüm Ulutaş. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Ümmügülsüm Ulutaş · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2023, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
158
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) on perceived traumatic childbirth, anxiety, and psychological well-being among women with perceived traumatic childbirth. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either the EFT group or the control group. The EFT group received two face-to-face sessions and 14 guided online sessions over one week, while the control group received no intervention during the study period. Perceived traumatic childbirth was the primary outcome; anxiety and psychological well-being were the secondary outcomes.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted at Yurtbasi Family Health Center in Elazig, Türkiye. Women were eligible if they had a Perception of Traumatic Childbirth Scale score of 27 or higher, a Subjective Units of Experience score of -1 or lower, and a history of at least one vaginal birth.

Eligible participants were randomly assigned to the Emotional Freedom Technique group or the no-intervention control group. The EFT intervention consisted of an initial face-to-face session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes on Day 1, followed by 14 guided online sessions delivered via Zoom twice daily for one week. Each online session lasted approximately 15 minutes. A second face-to-face session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes was conducted on Day 7. Participants in the EFT group therefore completed a total of 16 sessions.

Assessments were conducted at baseline on Day 1 and approximately 40 minutes after the second face-to-face session on Day 7. Perceived traumatic childbirth was assessed using the Perception of Traumatic Childbirth Scale. Anxiety was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and psychological well-being was assessed using the Psychological Well-Being Scale. The control group received no intervention during the study period. After data collection was completed, control-group participants who requested EFT were offered an online session.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perceived Traumatic Childbirth

Keywords

  • Emotional Freedom Technique
  • Birth Trauma
  • Anxiety
  • Psychological Well-Being
  • Midwifery
03

In context

Birth Injuries

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Birth Injuries; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 158 is above the median of 115 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Birth Injuries.

Browse Birth Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ümmügülsüm Ulutaş as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A Perception of Traumatic Childbirth Scale score of 27 or higher
  • A negative affect level of -1 or lower on the Subjective Units of Experience Scale
  • A history of at least one vaginal birth
  • Registration at or presentation to Yurtbasi Family Health Center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A documented psychiatric diagnosis in the Family Health Center records
  • Inability to communicate in Turkish
  • Hearing, speech, or comprehension impairments that interfered with communication
  • Infection, wounds, or scars in the body areas used for tapping during Emotional Freedom Technique
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
158 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Emotional Freedom Technique Group

    Participants received a structured Emotional Freedom Technique intervention consisting of two face-to-face sessions and 14 guided online sessions over one week, for a total of 16 sessions.

    Behavioral: Emotional Freedom Technique

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants received no intervention during the study period. After completion of data collection, participants who requested Emotional Freedom Technique were offered an online session.

Interventions

  • BehavioralEmotional Freedom Technique

    The Emotional Freedom Technique intervention was delivered by a researcher who had completed 40 hours of certified EFT training. Participants received an initial face-to-face session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes on Day 1. This was followed by 14 guided online sessions delivered via Zoom twice daily, in the morning and evening, over one week; each online session lasted approximately 15 minutes. A second face-to-face session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes was conducted on Day 7. The intervention included identification of distress related to the previous vaginal birth experience, assessment using the Subjective Units of Experience Scale, formulation and repetition of a reminder phrase, tapping on specified points, empowering affirmations, reassessment, and closure. Participants completed a total of 16 sessions.

    Also known as: EFT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perception of Traumatic Childbirth Scale Total Score

    Perceived traumatic childbirth was assessed using the Perception of Traumatic Childbirth Scale (PTCS). The scale consists of 13 self-report items, each scored from 0 to 10. Total scores range from 0 to 130, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of perceived traumatic childbirth. A total score of 27 or higher indicates perceived traumatic childbirth.

    Time frame: Baseline on Day 1 and Day 7, approximately 40 minutes after the second face-to-face intervention session

Secondary outcomes

  1. Beck Anxiety Inventory Total Score

    Anxiety was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The inventory consists of 21 self-report items, each scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline on Day 1 and Day 7, approximately 40 minutes after the second face-to-face intervention session

  2. Psychological Well-Being Scale Total Score

    Psychological well-being was assessed using the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS). The scale consists of eight self-report items rated on a 7-point scale. Total scores range from 8 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater psychological well-being.

    Time frame: Baseline on Day 1 and Day 7, approximately 40 minutes after the second face-to-face intervention session

Other outcomes

  1. Subjective Units of Experience Scale Score

    Emotional intensity was assessed using the Subjective Units of Experience (SUE) Scale. Scores range from -10 to +10, where -10 represents the most intense negative emotional experience, 0 represents a neutral state, and +10 represents the highest level of positive emotional experience. Higher scores indicate greater emotional relief and well-being.

    Time frame: Baseline on Day 1; approximately 40 minutes after the first face-to-face session on Day 1; before the second face-to-face session on Day 7; and approximately 40 minutes after the second face-to-face session on Day 7

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yurtbasi Family Health Center
    Elâzığ, Elâzığ, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07773298
Lead sponsor
Ümmügülsüm Ulutaş
Responsible party
Ümmügülsüm Ulutaş (Assistant Professor, Malatya Turgut Ozal University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Oct 9, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 18, 2024
Completion
Jun 18, 2024
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion