ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07772050CoBéUpdated Aug 19, 2026

IV Bevacizumab Treatment of Patients With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) or Rendu-Osler (RO) Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of French Cohort Data From 2009 to 2024

An observational study in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) and Rendu Osler Disease, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
244
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 20 studies in Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic by Hospices Civils de Lyon — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic · Hospices Civils de Lyon.

Started
2009
with 1 other
Observational
8 of 20
1 open now
Registered
20th of 20
by date

Among the 20 studies in Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic by Hospices Civils de Lyon, this one is one of 2 that started in 2009, is one of 8 observational ones, and was the 20th registered.

Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic; 24 are open to participants now.

Browse Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 20 studies in Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic by Hospices Civils de Lyon are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 2 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 17 Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic studies recruiting now, 14 (82%) set no upper age limit and 2 (12%) stop at 75 or younger; 6 take children under 18; 3 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic by Hospices Civils de Lyon, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Rendu-Osler disease (RO), also known as Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT), is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder. Its pathophysiology is associated with an imbalance in angiogenic balance. The resulting epistaxis and digestive bleeding can be severe, requiring repeated transfusions in 5% of patients. In addition, some patients with HHT may present with liver damage, leading to high-flow heart failure.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) plays a role in the pathophysiology of Rendu-Osler disease, leading to the use of a recombinant anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab. Studies conducted and promoted by HCL have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with HHT.

In 2014, bevacizumab was granted orphan drug designation for this disease. The 2020 international guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HHT suggest the use of systemic antiangiogenic agents in cases of epistaxis resistant to other treatments. The use of bevacizumab has been widely published in uncontrolled studies, demonstrating its efficacy in reducing epistaxis, improving anaemia, reducing transfusion dependence and improving quality of life.

In France, bevacizumab is currently prescribed outside the scope of its marketing authorization. Treatment indications are validated within the French network of expert centres and the FAVAmulti rare disease network. In other countries, access to this treatment varies widely according to local regulations, and is currently being evaluated in the European VASCERN network.

The aim of this study is to describe the use of bevacizumab in patients treated for HHT in France.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT)
  • Rendu Osler Disease

Keywords

  • HHT
  • Rendu-Osler
  • Bevacizumab
  • Bleeding
  • High Cardiac output
  • Anaemia
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

A Total of 317 patients will be included , all of whom were adults aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, and have received systemic bevacizumab exclusively for HHT-related manifestations.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • - Adult over 18 years of age
  • Rendu-Osler disease treated with bevacizumab prescribed for this condition
  • Treated and followed in France

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patient opposition to data use
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
244 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • HHT patients treated with IV bevacizumab

    Patients from the CIROCO database: Adults aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with HHT and have received bevacizumab between 2009 and 2025, in France, for severe HHT-related bleeding or severe hepatic involvement, consistent with established recommendations

    Other: Real World data study.

  • HHT patients treated with IV bevacizumab for severe bleeding

    Patients from the CIROCO database: Adults aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with HHT and have received bevacizumab between 2009 and 2025, in France, for severe HHT-related bleeding consistent with established recommendations

    Other: Real World data study.

  • HHT patients treated with IV bevacizumab for hight cardiac output/cardiac failure secondary to sever

    Patients from the CIROCO database: Adults aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with HHT and have received bevacizumab between 2009 and 2025, in France, for severe hepatic involvement, consistent with established recommendations

    Other: Real World data study.

  • HHT patients treated with IV bevacizumab for severe bleeding (epistaxis, Gastrointestinal bleeding G

    Patients from the CIROCO database: Adults aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with HHT and have received bevacizumab between 2009 and 2025, in France, for severe HHT-related bleeding and severe hepatic involvement, consistent with established recommendations

    Other: Real World data study.

Interventions

  • OtherReal World data study.

    The bevacizumab population is defined as patients who received at least one bevacizumab injection. Descriptive analyses will be performed using demographic, clinical and genetic data

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The cumulated number of RBC (Red Blood Cell) units transfused

    The number of RBC units transfused (date and number of units)

    Time frame: Efficacy outcomes were assessed across three consecutive 6-month periods: Period P1 (baseline), 6 months prior to the first infusion of bevacizumab ; Period P2, first 6 months following the initial induction infusion ; Period P3, the 6 months immediatel

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin values (g/L)

    Hemoglobin values were collected continually, the average of all available hemoglobin values were calculated for each period, anemia was defined as an hemoglobin mean level less than 120 g/dl regardless of gender

    Time frame: Efficacy outcomes were assessed across three consecutive 6-month periods: Period P1 (baseline), 6 months prior to the first infusion of bevacizumab ; Period P2, first 6 months following the initial induction infusion ; Period P3, the 6 months immediatel

Other outcomes

  1. The cumulated amount of iron administrated (mg)

    The cumulated amount of iron administrated (mg)

    Time frame: Efficacy outcomes were assessed across three consecutive 6-month periods: Period P1 (baseline), 6 months prior to the first infusion of bevacizumab ; Period P2, first 6 months following the initial induction infusion ; Period P3, the 6 months immediatel

  2. The HSS (Hematologic Support Score) was calculated for each period

    (Additional information about the outcome measure, if needed for clarification. Limit: 600 characters) HSS is a validated composite metric integrating transfusion burden and iron therapy; HSS =(Units of RBC transfused) + (mg elemental Fe/250)

    Time frame: Efficacy outcomes were assessed across three consecutive 6-month periods: Period P1 (baseline), 6 months prior to the first infusion of bevacizumab ; Period P2, first 6 months following the initial induction infusion ; Period P3, the 6 months immediatel

  3. In patients in group 2 (see section 'groups and interventions'), Cardiac index was measured by echocardiography

    (Additional information about the outcome measure, if needed for clarification. Limit: 600 characters) A cardiac index of 2.5-3.9L/min/m² was considered normal , irrespective of gender

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks afer Day 1 (the first bevacizumab infusion)

  4. To assess the safety profile

    A predefined list of common adverse events was available in the database with the option to add newly observed adverse events. Any adverse event is discussed to assess its imputability to bevacizumab and to determine the appropriate management strategy (treatment discontinuation, continuation, or dose adjustment). Survival status was collected systematically.

    Time frame: From Day 1 (the first bevacizumab infusion) through treatment completion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
    Bron, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2009 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 191 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 19, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2009
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07772050
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2009
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion