CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07765771MISIUpdated Aug 14, 2026

Minimal-Incision Technique With Modified Tracking Pin Placement Versus Standard Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

An interventional study of MISI Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty and Standard Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Osteo Arthritis of the Knee, sponsored by Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-14.

Sponsored by Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will compare a minimal-incision and soft-tissue-preserving (MISI) technique with the standard surgical technique in patients undergoing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. A total of 100 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either the MISI technique, which uses a reduced skin incision, limited soft-tissue dissection, and modified tracking pin placement, or the standard technique. The primary outcome is postoperative scar assessment at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include incision length, wound oozing, thigh pain and tenderness, recovery of straight-leg raising, tracking pin-related complications, patellar height, patient-reported scar assessments, and functional outcomes during follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty requires surgical exposure and placement of tracking pins. Conventional techniques may involve a relatively long incision, broader soft-tissue dissection, and diaphyseal pin insertion. The MISI technique was developed to reduce surgical invasiveness through a shorter incision, limited soft-tissue dissection, and modified tracking pin placement that avoids diaphyseal pin insertion.

Participants will be randomly assigned to the MISI or standard technique in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical evaluations will be performed during follow-up for up to 12 months. The study will assess whether the MISI technique improves scar-related outcomes and early recovery without increasing procedure-related complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteo Arthritis of the Knee

Keywords

  • Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Minimal Incision
  • MISI
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Degenerative knee osteoarthritis requiring robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
  • Body mass index below 30 kg/m²
  • Preoperative knee flexion of 90 degrees or greater
  • Ability to understand the study information and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Skin lesions or conditions that may adversely affect wound healing
  • Previous intra-articular surgery of the affected knee
  • Inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis
  • Severe hepatic or renal disease associated with poor general health
  • Comorbid conditions that may substantially affect mobility, including Parkinson disease, sequelae of poliomyelitis, or stroke
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete the required follow-up
  • Any medical or other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation inappropriate
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MISI tenchique

    Participants will undergo robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the minimal incision and minimal soft-tissue injury (MISI) technique. The procedure uses an approximately 10-cm main incision with limited soft-tissue dissection. Two femoral tracking pins are inserted through the main incision, and one tibial tracking pin is inserted through an additional approximately 5-mm incision.

    Procedure: MISI Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Active comparator
    Standard technique

    Participants will undergo robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the standard surgical technique. Tracking arrays are secured using the conventional pin placement method, with four tracking pins placed in the femoral and tibial regions and an additional femoral incision.

    Procedure: Standard Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Interventions

  • ProcedureMISI Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed using an approximately 10-cm main incision, limited soft-tissue dissection, two femoral tracking pins inserted through the main incision, and one tibial tracking pin inserted through an additional approximately 5-mm incision.

  • ProcedureStandard Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed using the standard incision and soft-tissue exposure, with conventional placement of four tracking pins in the femoral and tibial regions and an additional femoral incision.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Score

    The combined Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score is calculated by summing the total Patient Scale score and the total Observer Scale score. Each scale consists of six items rated from 1 to 10, resulting in a score of 6 to 60 for each scale and a combined score ranging from 12 to 120. Higher scores indicate poorer scar quality. The Observer Scale will be completed by an independent outcome assessor blinded to treatment allocation.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Score

    The combined Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score is calculated by summing the total Patient Scale score and the total Observer Scale score. Each scale consists of six items rated from 1 to 10, resulting in a score of 6 to 60 for each scale and a combined score ranging from 12 to 120. Higher scores indicate poorer scar quality. The Observer Scale will be completed by an independent outcome assessor blinded to treatment allocation.

    Time frame: 3 and 6 weeks after surgery

  2. Main Surgical Incision Length

    The length of the main surgical incision will be measured in centimeters. The initial incision length will be measured immediately after the skin incision with the knee in extension, and the final incision length will be measured before wound closure. The incision length will also be evaluated on postoperative day 1. Separate tracking pin-site incisions will not be included.

    Time frame: During surgery and on postoperative day 1

  3. Intraoperative Incision Stretching Index

    The incision stretching index is calculated as the maximum length of the main incision during knee flexion and maximal surgical retraction divided by the initial incision length measured with the knee in extension. A value of 1 indicates no stretching, and higher values indicate greater intraoperative stretching of the incision and surrounding soft tissue.

    Time frame: During surgery

  4. Postoperative Gauze Oozing Grade

    Postoperative wound oozing will be assessed according to the amount of blood or exudate visible on the surgical dressing using a prespecified ordinal grading scale. Higher grades indicate more extensive wound oozing.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 6

  5. Thigh Pain at Rest on the Numeric Rating Scale

    Participants will rate thigh pain at rest using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 6

  6. Thigh Pain During Active Hip Flexion on the Numeric Rating Scale

    Participants will rate thigh pain during active hip flexion while maintaining knee extension and without external resistance. Pain will be assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 6

  7. Tenderness at the Standardized Tracking Pin-Site Location

    Tenderness elicited by palpation at a prespecified standardized anatomical location corresponding to the tracking pin region will be rated using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no tenderness and 10 indicates the worst imaginable tenderness.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 6

  8. Ability to Perform Straight-Leg Raising

    The participant's ability to independently raise the operated lower extremity while maintaining knee extension will be recorded as a binary outcome: able or unable to perform straight-leg raising. The number and proportion of participants able to perform the test will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 6

  9. Pain During the Resisted Straight-Leg-Raising Test

    Pain during resisted straight-leg raising will be assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale, where 0 mm indicates no pain and 100 mm indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 6

  10. Incidence of Tracking Pin-Site Complications

    Tracking pin sites will be examined for complications, including erythema, swelling, wound drainage, infection, and pin-related fracture. The occurrence of one or more prespecified pin-site complications will be recorded as a binary outcome, and the number and proportion of participants with any complication will be reported.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 6 and postoperative week 3

  11. Forgotten Joint Score-12

    The Forgotten Joint Score-12 is a 12-item patient-reported questionnaire assessing awareness of the operated knee during daily activities. Scores are transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less awareness of the artificial joint and a better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery

  12. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) assesses knee pain, stiffness, and physical function. The 24 items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and poorer physical function.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
    Seoul, South Korea
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07765771
Lead sponsor
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Responsible party
Jung-Il Kim (Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 14, 2026
Start date
Aug 17, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 14, 2026

Study contacts

Ho-Jung Jung, MD, PhD
Contact
hodge@hallym.or.kr
82-02-819-5165
Joong-Il Kim, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion