ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07765225Updated Aug 14, 2026

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Cosmetic Keratolytic Treatment of Foot Calluses and Corns

An interventional study of Topical Keratolytic Cosmetic (Serum + Cream) in Hyperkeratosis, Callus and Corn (Clavus), sponsored by Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to female participants aged 35 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-14.

Sponsored by Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2020, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
35 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective, non-randomized, controlled study evaluated the efficacy of a topical cosmetic keratolytic preparation (serum and cream containing urea, salicylic acid, and collagen) in reducing the thickness and associated pain of hyperkeratotic foot lesions (calluses and corns). High-frequency ultrasonography (18 MHz) was used for precise, quantitative measurement of lesion thickness before and after a two-month intervention. Participants were allocated to four parallel groups (treated calluses, untreated callus controls, treated corns, and untreated corn controls).

Read the detailed description

A total of 124 women aged 35-65 years, each presenting with a single non-infectious hyperkeratotic foot lesion, were allocated by lesion type (callus or corn) and by intervention (treated vs untreated), forming four parallel groups of 31. Treated participants applied 2 mL of serum followed by 2 mL of cream, each massaged into the lesion for two minutes, twice daily for two months. Untreated controls received no topical intervention over the same period. Lesion thickness (cm) was measured with an Esaote MyLab60 system and an 18 MHz linear probe, and pain was self-reported on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, at baseline and after two months. Within-group changes were analysed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and between-group reductions with the Mann-Whitney U test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperkeratosis
  • Callus
  • Corn (Clavus)
  • Foot Dermatoses

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • high-frequency ultrasonography
  • keratolytic
  • urea
  • salicylic acid
  • collagen
  • podiatry
  • foot skin lesions
03

In context

Callosities

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Callosities; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 124 is above the median of 60 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Callosities.

Browse Callosities studies →

Lead sponsor

Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult women aged 35-65 years.
  • Presence of a single non-infectious hyperkeratotic foot lesion classified as either a callus or a corn.
  • Written provided prior to study initiation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or to salicylic acid, salicylates, or other formulation ingredients.
  • Active dermatological conditions, skin diseases, or epidermal fissures on the lower extremities.
  • Diabetes mellitus.
  • Active cardiovascular disorders or local inflammatory conditions.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Calluses: Keratolytic Treatment

    Women with foot calluses applying the topical keratolytic cosmetic serum and cream twice daily for 2 months.

    Other: Topical Keratolytic Cosmetic (Serum + Cream)

  • No intervention
    Calluses: Untreated Control

    Women with foot calluses receiving no topical treatment over the 2-month observation period

  • Experimental
    Corns: Keratolytic Treatment

    Women with foot corns applying the topical keratolytic cosmetic serum and cream twice daily for 2 months

    Other: Topical Keratolytic Cosmetic (Serum + Cream)

  • No intervention
    Corns: Untreated Control

    Women with foot corns receiving no topical treatment over the 2-month observation period

Interventions

  • OtherTopical Keratolytic Cosmetic (Serum + Cream)

    Application of 2 mL serum followed by 2 mL cream containing urea, salicylic acid, and collagen, massaged into the hyperkeratotic lesion for 2 minutes, twice daily (morning and evening) for 2 months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Hyperkeratotic Lesion Thickness

    Lesion thickness measured in centimetres using high-frequency ultrasonography (Esaote MyLab60 with an 18 MHz linear probe)

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Lesion-Associated Pain

    Participant self-reported pain assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • OSTEON Clinic
    Swidnica, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Wortsman, X. Expanding dermatologic ultrasonography applications: further insights for enhanced patient management. Ultrasonography 42 (3), 476-477. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.23082 (2023). 2. Bader, D. & Worsley, P. Technologies to monitor the health of loaded skin tissues. Biomed. Eng. Online 17 (1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0457 (2018). 3. Benedetti, J. Diagnostic tests for skin disorders. MSD Manual Professional Edition (2024). 4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Ultrasound. NIBIB (Bethesda, MD). 5. Bhatta, A. et al. Application of high-frequency ultrasound in dermatology. Discov. Med. 26 (145), 237-242 (2018). 6. Cheng, X. et al. High-frequency ultrasound in blistering skin diseases: a useful method for differentiating blister locations. J. Ultrasound Med. 36 (11), 2367-2371. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14302 (2017). 7. Cohen, P. R. & Anderson, C. A. Topical selenium sulfide for the treatment of hyperkeratosis. Dermatol. Ther. (Heidelb.) 8 (4), 639-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-018-0247-2 (2018). 8. Wortsman, X. Top applications of dermatologic ultrasonography that can modify management. Ultrasonography 42, 183-202. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.22130 (2023). 9. Argalia, G. et al. High-frequency and ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in dermatologic diseases and aesthetic medicine. Medicina (Kaunas) 61 (2), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020220 (2025). 10. Cisoń, H. & Białynicki-Birula, R. High-frequency ultrasonography: one of the modern imaging diagnostic methods in dermatology. Authors' own experience and review. Adv. Dermatol. Allergol. 41 (3), 306-313. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2024.141108 (2024). 11. Wang, Q. et al. Role of high-frequency ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant skin lesions: potential and limitations. Ultrasonography 43 (4), 238-249. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.24015 (2024). 12. Jaguś, D., Malinowska, S. & Mlosek, R. Skin ultrasound diagnostics in beauty parlour. Ae

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (lesion thickness measurements and VAS pain scores, before and after the intervention) underlying the results reported in the associated publication will be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Beginning after publication of the main results, with no planned end date

Access criteria: Available to qualified researchers on reasonable request to the corresponding author (agnieszka.ciszek@awf.wroc.pl)

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2020 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 73 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 10, 2026
First posted
Aug 14, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2026
CompletionActual
May 1, 2026
Last update
Aug 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07765225
Lead sponsor
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences
Responsible party
Agnieszka Ciszek (Assistant Professor, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 14, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026
Completion
May 1, 2026
Last update
Aug 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion