ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07760532Updated Aug 12, 2026

Comparing Facial Aging Between Identical Twins With 3D Imaging

An observational study in Facial Skin Aging, Facial Volume Loss and Wrinkle Appearance, sponsored by Ponsky Facial Aesthetics And Plastic Surgery, Llc. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by Ponsky Facial Aesthetics And Plastic Surgery, Llc · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Family-based
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Identical twins share the same genes, which makes them a powerful way to study how lifestyle and environment - rather than genetics - affect how faces age. This study builds on a landmark 2009 twin study by using modern three-dimensional (3D) facial imaging, which measures facial shape and volume precisely instead of relying on regular photographs. The study will also look at whether use of GLP-1 weight-loss medications (such as semaglutide or tirzepatide), sometimes associated with facial changes informally called "Ozempic face," is related to measurable differences in facial aging.

The study will enroll adult identical twin pairs attending the Twins Days Festival in Twinsburg, Ohio, in August 2026. Participation takes about 30 minutes and happens in a single visit at the festival study booth. Each twin will complete a questionnaire about lifestyle, environment, and medical history (such as sun exposure, smoking, sleep, and medication use) and have a 3D image of their face taken with a non-contact camera system. There is no treatment, no medication, no blood draw or biological sample, and no follow-up visit. Researchers will then compare facial measurements within each twin pair to learn which lifestyle and environmental factors are linked to visible facial aging.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, observational, single-site study conducted at the Twins Days Festival, Twinsburg, Ohio (August 8-9, 2026). The design revisits the 2009 identical-twin facial aging study of Guyuron and colleagues with two methodological advances: replacement of standardized two-dimensional photography with three-dimensional facial surface imaging, permitting objective quantitative measurement of volumetric and topographic facial differences, and inclusion of GLP-1 receptor agonist and other rapid weight-loss medication exposure as a facial-aging variable that did not exist as a widespread exposure at the time of the original study.

Participation is completed in a single session. After eligibility screening and written informed consent, each twin independently completes a structured questionnaire covering demographic, lifestyle, environmental, and medical-history domains, and undergoes standardized 3D facial surface imaging using a non-contact, non-ionizing optical system (approximately 1-2 minutes per participant). A staff member records Fitzpatrick skin type by brief visual assessment. No intervention is administered, no biological specimens are collected, no genetic testing is performed, and no individual results are returned. Zygosity is established by participant self-report, supported where available by prior DNA testing or physician confirmation; self-reported dizygotic or zygosity-uncertain pairs are recorded as such and analyzed separately from the confirmed monozygotic cohort.

All data are recorded against coded participant identifiers. Because each monozygotic pair serves as its own genetic control, the primary analysis is of within-pair differences in quantitative 3D facial measurements, correlated with discordance in self-reported exposures. For the secondary objective, twin pairs discordant for self-reported GLP-1 receptor agonist use are compared with respect to midface and lower-face volume and contour. All measurement, extraction, and analysis of study data are performed by the study team on coded data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Facial Skin Aging
  • Facial Volume Loss
  • Wrinkle Appearance

Keywords

  • identical twin study facial aging
  • identical twins with ozempic face
  • twins three-dimensional imaging
  • environmental factors that contribute to aging identical twins
  • Dr. Diana Ponsky Facial Aging Study
  • Dr. Diana Ponsky identical twin study
  • Dr. Diana Ponsky 3d study
  • Dr Diana Ponsky twins facial aging
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ponsky Facial Aesthetics And Plastic Surgery, Llc as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult twin pairs attending the Twins Days Festival in Twinsburg, Ohio (August 8-9, 2026), the largest annual gathering of twins in the world. Participants are recruited on-site through a study booth and printed festival materials, and in advance through a study information page on the practice website. Anticipated enrollment is approximately 50 to 100 twin pairs (up to approximately 200 individual participants).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Members of a monozygotic (identical) twin pair, with both twins present and willing to participate
  • Able to provide written in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide
  • Facial conditions or recent facial surgery that, in the investigator's judgment, would prevent standardized imaging
  • Pregnancy, by self-report

Note: Zygosity is established by participant self-report, supported where available by prior DNA testing or physician confirmation. No genetic testing is performed and no biological specimens are collected. Pairs who self-report as dizygotic or are uncertain of their zygosity are recorded as such and analyzed separately from the confirmed monozygotic cohort.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Family-based
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Adult twin pairs

    Adult (18+) twin pairs attending the Twins Days Festival, Twinsburg, Ohio, with both members present and consenting. Each participant completes a lifestyle and medical-history questionnaire and undergoes standardized three-dimensional facial surface imaging in a single session. Zygosity is established by self-report; pairs self-reporting as dizygotic or unsure are recorded as such and analyzed separately from the confirmed monozygotic cohort.

    Drug: GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Interventions

  • Self-reported current or prior use of GLP-1 receptor agonist or other rapid weight-loss medication, recorded by participant questionnaire. No medication is administered, assigned, dispensed, or modified by the study; use is observed as a naturally occurring exposure. For the secondary objective, twin pairs discordant for self-reported GLP-1 receptor agonist use are compared with respect to midface and lower-face volume and contour.

    Also known as: Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, Ozempic

This study also gives Semaglutide, Tirzepatide. No intervention listed here names it: that was found by reading the record.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Within-pair difference in quantitative three-dimensional facial surface measurements

    Description: Volumetric and topographic facial measurements (facial volume and surface contour) derived from standardized 3D facial surface images, compared within each monozygotic twin pair. Within-pair differences are correlated with within-pair discordance in self-reported lifestyle, environmental, and medical exposures recorded by questionnaire.

    Time frame: Day 1 (single study visit; all data collected at enrollment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Within-pair difference in midface and lower-face volume and contour among twin pairs discordant for GLP-1 receptor agonist use

    Midface and lower-face volume and contour measurements derived from standardized 3D facial surface images, compared within monozygotic twin pairs in which one twin reports current or prior GLP-1 receptor agonist use and the other does not.

    Time frame: Day 1 (single study visit; all data collected at enrollment)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ponsky Facial Aesthetics and Plastic Surgery, LLC
    Beachwood, Ohio 44122, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Guyuron B, Rowe DJ, Weinfeld AB, Eshraghi Y, Fathi A, Iamphongsai S. Factors contributing to the facial aging of identical twins. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Apr;123(4):1321-1331. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819c4d42. PubMed 19337100 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — "Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers, consistent with the informed consent, which states that coded study data and images are not used or distributed for research beyond this study."

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Sep 2026, 1 month later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 7, 2026
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 2026
Last update
Aug 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07760532
Lead sponsor
Ponsky Facial Aesthetics And Plastic Surgery, Llc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
Start date
Aug 8, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Lauren Ickes M Study Coordinator
Contact
info@drdianaponsky.com
(216) 480-1843
Diana Ponsky, MD, FACS
Contact
diana@drdianaponsky.com
(216) 480-1843
Dr. Diana Ponsky, MD, FACS
principal investigator · Ponsky Facial Aesthetics And Plastic Surgery, Llc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion