ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07758764PRE'PASUpdated Nov 4, 2026

The Balance and Foot Health Program for Older Adults: A Randomized Study

An interventional study of Weekly foot health workshops and Balance Workshops in Fall Prevention, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux. Recruiting at 20 sites in France. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Nov 4, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Every year in France, 2 million falls by people over 65 are responsible for 10,000 deaths, the leading cause of accidental death, and more than 130,000 hospitalizations. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of adding 12 weekly foot health workshops to balance workshops on mobility among older adults living in nursing homes, compared to a program based exclusively on balance workshops.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial is to evaluate whether a structured Foot Health Program combined with balance training improves functional outcomes in nursing home residents compared with balance training alone.

Foot disorders are common among older adults living in nursing homes and may contribute to impaired balance, reduced mobility, loss of functional independence, and increased risk of falls. Interventions targeting foot health, sensory stimulation, foot mobility, and foot muscle strengthening may represent an innovative approach to complement conventional fall prevention strategies. This study aims to assess the added value of a multimodal foot-focused intervention when combined with a standardized balance training program.

Twenty nursing homes (EHPADs) will participate in the study. Nursing homes will be randomized at the facility level in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. Ten facilities will be allocated to the intervention group and ten facilities to the control group. A total of 200 participants will be enrolled, with approximately 10 residents recruited in each nursing home.

Prior to enrollment, eligibility criteria will be assessed during a screening visit. Study information will be provided to participants and, when applicable, to their legal representative or trusted person. Written informed consent will be obtained before participation in any study procedures.

At baseline (T0), demographic and clinical characteristics will be collected. All participants will undergo a podiatric assessment performed by a podiatrist involved in the study. Routine foot care will be provided when required. Baseline outcome assessments will be completed within 15 days before the first intervention session.

Participants allocated to the intervention group will receive a structured Foot Health Program in addition to standardized balance workshops. The Foot Health Program consists of 12 weekly sessions delivered by a mobile nurse trained in foot massage techniques and foot health education. The intervention was developed and refined through a feasibility study and subsequently standardized to ensure reproducibility across participating nursing homes.

The Foot Health Program is organized into three sequential phases. The first phase (sessions 1 to 3) focuses on foot preparation. Participants attend individual weekly sessions lasting approximately 30 minutes. Sessions include foot massage, sensory stimulation activities, and gentle foot mobilization exercises. Participants are encouraged to perform selected exercises independently between sessions. Minimalist footwear is introduced at the end of this phase and may be used outside supervised sessions according to participant preference and tolerance.

The second phase (sessions 4 to 6) focuses on transition toward active exercise. Participants attend weekly group sessions lasting approximately 45 minutes. Activities emphasize foot and ankle mobility, strengthening of intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscles, and progressive motor control exercises. Brief foot massage is maintained as preparation for exercise.

The third phase (sessions 7 to 12) focuses on stabilization and functional integration. Participants continue weekly group sessions and progressively incorporate minimalist footwear into the intervention. Exercises acquired during previous phases are reinforced and integrated into functional activities involving posture, balance, gait, and mobility. The objective is to facilitate transfer of acquired abilities into daily activities and support functional autonomy.

Participants allocated to the control group will receive balance workshops only.

All participants, regardless of group allocation, will participate in a standardized balance training program. Balance workshops will be conducted once weekly for approximately one hour throughout the study period. Sessions may be delivered by external adapted physical activity providers, adapted physical activity professionals employed by the facility, or physiotherapists, depending on local organization. To ensure consistency across study sites, all instructors will follow a predefined exercise framework and standardized session structure. Sessions will include warm-up exercises, static and dynamic balance training, and functional strengthening activities. Exercise intensity and difficulty may be adapted to individual participant abilities while preserving the core components of the program.

Following completion of the initial 12-week intervention period, participants in both groups will continue attending weekly balance workshops for an additional 12 weeks. During this follow-up period, no Foot Health Program sessions will be provided.

Outcome assessments will be performed at three time points. Baseline assessments (T0) will be conducted within 15 days before the first intervention session. Post-intervention assessments (T1) will be conducted within 15 days after completion of the first 12 sessions. Follow-up assessments (T2) will be conducted after completion of the additional 12 weeks of balance training.

In addition to study outcome measures, data collected at T1 will include attendance rates, adherence to the intervention, participant satisfaction with the workshops, satisfaction with minimalist footwear, and footwear utilization. At T2, satisfaction with footwear and continued footwear use will be reassessed.

All study data collected at T0, T1, and T2 will be recorded by trained members of the study team and entered into an electronic case report form (eCRF) by qualified clinical research personnel.

The study is designed to determine whether a multimodal intervention targeting foot health provides additional benefits beyond standardized balance training alone in nursing home residents and may contribute to the development of new strategies for maintaining mobility, balance, and functional independence in this population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fall Prevention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • People aged 65 and older.
  • Residents of nursing homes.
  • Able to walk, with or without a walking aid (cane, walker, etc.)
  • Residents at risk of falling, defined by at least one of the following criteria: history of a fall within the last 12 months; unsteadiness while walking or balance issues; limited mobility.
  • Able to understand and follow simple instructions.
  • Able to participate in workshops.
  • Enrolled in a social security program or beneficiaries of an equivalent program.
  • Individuals (participants, guardians, or conservators, as applicable) who have been informed and have provided written consent for their participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Regular use of minimalist shoes at the time of enrollment.

  • Medical condition or clinical situation contraindicating the use of minimalist shoes, as determined by the investigator.
  • Use of orthopedic shoes prescribed by a healthcare professional.
  • Unhealed foot wound or active foot infection.
  • Recent lower limb fracture (\< 3 months) or recent lower limb trauma, likely to limit participation in the workshops or contraindicate foot mobilization, as assessed by the investigator.
  • Severe cognitive impairment preventing the understanding of simple instructions or participation in the workshops.
  • Any other clinical condition deemed incompatible with participation in the study by the investigator.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group

    Participants in the intervention group will attend weekly workshops as part of the Foot Health program (12 sessions), led by a mobile nurse trained in massage. The mobile nurse will perform all massages and lead the foot health workshops for all participants in the intervention group. Her status as a healthcare professional ensures the safety of the intervention. In addition, she is trained in wellness massage techniques. Participants will also take part in 12 workshops focused on balance, led by a professional in adapted physical activity. This workshop will include recommended strength training and balance exercises.

    Other: Weekly foot health workshops · Other: Balance Workshops

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    The control group will participate only in 24 balance workshops. Balance workshops have been developed over the past decade to improve the independence of nursing home residents. However, their implementation varies widely from one facility to another, with differences in content, frequency, and instructors. This variability underscores the need to establish a common framework to ensure the comparability of interventions in a research setting.

    Other: Balance Workshops

Interventions

  • OtherWeekly foot health workshops

    Combination of minimalist footwear, foot massages, and workshops to re-learn walking and posture, 12 workshops are planned, every week.

  • OtherBalance Workshops

    Participants will take part in 12 balance workshops following a standardized format, including warm-up exercises, static and dynamic balance exercises, and functional strength training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in the Timed Up and Go test time, expressed in seconds

    The Timed Up and Go is a commonly used screening tool to assess mobility in older adults. The participant must stand up from a chair, walk a distance of three meters, turn around, then walk back to the chair and sit down. These tasks must be performed in a comfortable and safe pace. A practice trial is allowed to help the individual become familiar with the task. The individual wears their usual shoes. The use of a walking aid is permitted, but its use must be noted on the data collection form. No physical assistance is provided. The TUG is also sensitive to changes, detecting improvements or deteriorations in functional mobility. It has high validity, being able to correctly identify fallers and non-fallers with a sensitivity and specificity of 87%. Finally, this test is accurate, simple to administer, and useful for assessing functional mobility, particularly in older or medically compromised populations.

    Time frame: at baseline assessment (T0) and after the 12 intervention sessions (T1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in the position of the center of pressure during static stance

    Changes in the movement of the center of pressure in a static position, measured using a stabilometry platform, with eyes open and closed, at baseline assessment (T0), after the foot care intervention (T1), and at the end of the study (T2). Postural control is generally assessed by analyzing the length of the center of pressure trajectory, which quantifies the extent of body sway and stability while standing. The displacement of the center of pressure is widely recognized as one of the most reliable indicators of postural stability 43. When the eyes are open, postural control relies primarily on the visual system, whereas when the eyes are closed, the vestibular system, proprioceptive inputs, and plantar mechanoreceptors play a more significant role in maintaining balance.

    Time frame: at baseline assessment (T0) and after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

  2. Changes in the muscle strength of the flexors of the big toes (hallux)

    Changes in muscle strength of the big toe flexors (hallux) measured using a dynamometer (The Toe Strength Dynamometer) at baseline assessment (T0) and after the foot care intervention (T1) and the end of the study (T2). In older adults, muscle strength loss has recently emerged as a risk factor for falls. The dynamometer used in this study demonstrated moderate to excellent intra-rater reliability, as well as good to excellent inter-rater reliability for all measurements.

    Time frame: at baseline assessment (T0) and after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

  3. Changes in ankle joint range of motion during dorsiflexion and plantar flexion

    Changes in ankle joint range of motion in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, measured using a digital goniometer, at baseline assessment (T0) and after the foot care intervention (T1) and the end of the study (T2). The Weight-Bearing Lunge test is commonly used to assess the range of dorsiflexion of the ankle. However, during our feasibility study, it proved difficult to perform in a population of very elderly individuals. To overcome this difficulty, we will use a digital goniometer.

    Time frame: at baseline assessment (T0) and after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

  4. Changes in participants' fear of falling

    Changes in participants' fear of falling, measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale at baseline assessment (T0) and after the foot care intervention (T1) and the end of the study (T2). The use of a binary question to assess fear of falling is reliable and easy to use in research and clinical practice, particularly in nursing homes.

    Time frame: at baseline assessment (T0) and after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

  5. Changes in foot pain experienced while walking

    Changes in foot pain experienced while walking, measured at baseline assessment (T0) and after the foot care intervention (T1) and the end of the study (T2) using a numerical scale from 0 to 10;

    Time frame: at baseline assessment (T0) and after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

  6. The Evolution of Mobility Through the TUG

    Changes in mobility as measured by the TUG, assessed after the foot care intervention (T1) and the end of the study (T2).

    Time frame: after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

  7. The incidence of falls measured over the course of the study

    The recording of falls during the study period, using fall reports from medical records and a patient questionnaire

    Time frame: From baseline assessment (T0) until 6 months (T2)

  8. Participants' satisfaction with minimalist shoes and the various workshops

    Participants' satisfaction with minimalist shoes and the various workshops, as measured by a questionnaire administered after the foot care intervention (T1) and the end of the study (T2).

    Time frame: after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

  9. The number of hours per day that shoes were worn by participants in the experimental group

    The number of hours per day that shoes were worn by participants in the experimental group following the foot care intervention (T1) and at the end of the study (T2), as reported via a questionnaire.

    Time frame: after the 12 intervention sessions (T1) and 6 months (T2).

07

Study locations

4 of 20 sites recruiting
  • EHPAD " Les 2 Volcans"
    Allègre, 43270, France
    Recruiting
  • EHPAD "Foyer Notre-Dame"
    Beaulieu, 43800, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Bon secours"
    Beauzac, 43590, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Vert Bocage"
    Brives-Charensac, 43700, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Sainte Monique"
    Coubon, 43700, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Saint Dominique"
    Craponne-sur-Arzon, 43500, France
    Recruiting
  • EHPAD Centre Hospitalier du Pays De Craponne
    Craponne-sur-Arzon, 43500, France
    Recruiting
  • EHPAD "Le grand pré "
    Lantriac, 43260, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Les Terrasses de la Gazeille"
    Le Monastier-sur-Gazeille, 43150, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Bel Horizon"
    Le Puy-en-Velay, 43000, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Les Patios du Velay"
    Le Puy-en-Velay, 43000, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "L'Age d'Or"
    Monistrol-sur-Loire, 43120, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence des Bords de Loire"
    Retournac, 43130, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence La Roseraie"
    Rosières, 43800, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "la Tortue"
    Saint-Julien-Chapteuil, 43260, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "l'Orangeraie"
    Saint-Maurice-de-Lignon, 43200, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence Ruessium"
    Saint-Paulien, 43350, France
    Recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence Sainte Sigolène"
    Sainte-Sigolène, 43600, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Foyer Bon Accueil"
    Solignac-sur-Loire, 43370, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Foyer Marie Goy"
    Vorey, 43800, France
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2028, 16 months after the start.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Aug 2026, on Nov 4, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2026
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
StartActual
Aug 20, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2029
Last update
Nov 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 4, 2026
Sites
20 sites changed recruiting status (16 now not yet recruiting, 4 now recruiting)
Show 20 sites
  • EHPAD " Les 2 Volcans" · Allègre, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • EHPAD "Foyer Notre-Dame" · Beaulieu, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Bon secours" · Beauzac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Vert Bocage" · Brives-Charensac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Sainte Monique" · Coubon, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Saint Dominique" · Craponne-sur-Arzon, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • EHPAD Centre Hospitalier du Pays De Craponne · Craponne-sur-Arzon, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • EHPAD "Le grand pré " · Lantriac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Les Terrasses de la Gazeille" · Le Monastier-sur-Gazeille, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Bel Horizon" · Le Puy-en-Velay, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Les Patios du Velay" · Le Puy-en-Velay, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "L'Age d'Or" · Monistrol-sur-Loire, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence des Bords de Loire" · Retournac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence La Roseraie" · Rosières, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "la Tortue" · Saint-Julien-Chapteuil, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "l'Orangeraie" · Saint-Maurice-de-Lignon, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence Ruessium" · Saint-Paulien, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • EHPAD "Résidence Sainte Sigolène" · Sainte-Sigolène, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Foyer Bon Accueil" · Solignac-sur-Loire, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
  • EHPAD "Foyer Marie Goy" · Vorey, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026→Aug 20, 2026 (actual)
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    20 sites changed recruiting status (16 now not yet recruiting, 4 now recruiting)
    Show 20 sites
    • EHPAD " Les 2 Volcans" · Allègre, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • EHPAD "Foyer Notre-Dame" · Beaulieu, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Bon secours" · Beauzac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Vert Bocage" · Brives-Charensac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Sainte Monique" · Coubon, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Saint Dominique" · Craponne-sur-Arzon, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • EHPAD Centre Hospitalier du Pays De Craponne · Craponne-sur-Arzon, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • EHPAD "Le grand pré " · Lantriac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Les Terrasses de la Gazeille" · Le Monastier-sur-Gazeille, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Bel Horizon" · Le Puy-en-Velay, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Les Patios du Velay" · Le Puy-en-Velay, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "L'Age d'Or" · Monistrol-sur-Loire, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Résidence des Bords de Loire" · Retournac, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Résidence La Roseraie" · Rosières, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "la Tortue" · Saint-Julien-Chapteuil, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "l'Orangeraie" · Saint-Maurice-de-Lignon, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Résidence Ruessium" · Saint-Paulien, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • EHPAD "Résidence Sainte Sigolène" · Sainte-Sigolène, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Foyer Bon Accueil" · Solignac-sur-Loire, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    • EHPAD "Foyer Marie Goy" · Vorey, Franceno status→Not yet recruiting
    Start date Sep 1, 2026→Aug 20, 2026 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07758764
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
Start date
Aug 20, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion