An interventional study of ONS and Standard of Care (SOC) in Low Muscle Strength and Malnutrition, sponsored by Abbott Nutrition. Not yet recruiting at 7 sites in Thailand. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.
Sponsored by Abbott Nutrition (part of Abbott) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The study aims to determine the effects of Oral Nutritional Supplement (ONS) added to usual care on body weight compared with usual care alone in community-dwelling adults aged 55 years and older who are at risk of malnutrition and have low muscle strength following acute care.
Participants randomized to receive either ONS twice daily for 180 days plus usual care, or usual care alone. Usual care includes individualized dietary counseling and standardized physical activity advice provided. The study will assess body weight, nutritional status, muscle strength, physical function, dietary intake, and safety outcomes.
1,277 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 230 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 304 is above the median of 118 across 843 interventional studies indexed under Malnutrition.
Browse Malnutrition studies →Abbott Nutrition is the lead sponsor of 156 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Dietary Supplement: ONS · Other: Standard of Care (SOC)
Other: Standard of Care (SOC)
230 mL per serving, twice daily
Dietary counseling and physical activity advice
Change in body weight
Measured in kg
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180
Change in body weight
Measured in kg
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Body mass index (BMI)
Calculated as Weight (kg)/Height (m)2
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Calf circumference
Measured in cm
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)
Measured in cm
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Body composition
Body composition variables assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), including appendicular skeletal muscle mass, lean mass, fat-free mass, fat mass, and derived indices.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Nutrition Risk
Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) is a clinical tool used to identify persons at risk of malnutrition. It classifies participants into one of the 2 categories: 1. Score of \< 3 = Low risk 2. Score of ≥ 3 = At nutritional risk
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Handgrip strength
Maximum handgrip strength assessed using the Jamar dynamometer.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) total score
Short Physical Performance Battery total score ranges from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate better physical performance.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) component scores
Balance, 4-meter gait speed, and chair stand component scores; higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
4-meter gait speed
4-meter gait speed, measured in meters per second.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Chair stand time
Chair stand time, measured in seconds.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Energy, macronutrient and micronutrient intakes
24-Hour Dietary Recall: Researcher-led interview on food and drink intake the previous day. Nutrient analysis will be performed using a dietary analysis program.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Energy, macronutrient and micronutrient adequacy
Nutrient adequacy will be determined by comparing nutrient intakes (outcome No. 10) against sex- and age- specific local recommended nutrient intakes (RNI).
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2028, 15 months later.
Of 418 interventional studies with no phase under Malnutrition, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 15 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.