ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07752862VISIONUpdated Aug 7, 2026

Prospective Collection and Registry Study of Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Surgical Minimally Invasive Videos

An observational study in Surgical Neoplasms, Abdominal Surgical Diseases and Pelvic Surgical Diseases, sponsored by Chinese Academy of Sciences. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Chinese Academy of Sciences · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective multicenter patient registry study. We continuously collect full-length intraoperative surgical videos from thoracoscope, laparoscope, hysteroscope, transcervical resectoscope, cystoscope, prostate resectoscope, arthroscope, intervertebral foramen endoscope, otorhinolaryngology endoscope and endoscopic surgical robots, accompanied by inpatient medical records, preoperative imaging data and 5-year postoperative follow-up data. All imaging data will be standardized and de-identified to construct a large-scale standardized surgical video dataset. The dataset will be applied for training, verification and optimization of surgical video foundation large model, serving for surgical teaching, intraoperative operation quality control and basic medical AI research. We will also explore the correlation between intraoperative surgical details and postoperative prognosis to improve the standard specifications of minimally invasive surgery. No clinical intervention will be imposed on participants throughout the whole research.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Neoplasms
  • Abdominal Surgical Diseases
  • Pelvic Surgical Diseases
  • Urologic Surgical Diseases
  • Musculoskeletal Surgical Diseases
  • Head and Neck Surgical Diseases
  • Thoracic Surgical Diseases

Keywords

  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Surgical video dataset
  • Surgical artificial intelligence
  • Endoscopic surgery
  • Robotic surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Sciences is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This prospective multicenter observational cohort study will enroll a total of 2,000 inpatients undergoing minimally invasive endoscopic, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery across multiple departments and participating medical centers.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years old hospitalized to receive minimally invasive endoscopic, laparoscopic or robotic surgical treatment for diseases of various body systems;
  2. Complete full-length intraoperative surgical videos can be recorded during operation, with complete medical records and preoperative imaging data;
  3. Participants fully understand the study, voluntarily sign written , and agree that their de-identified intraoperative images and clinical data can be used for scientific research.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Minors under 18 years of age;
  2. Patients with incomplete intraoperative videos or missing clinical imaging documents;
  3. Patients with consciousness disturbance or mental disorders who cannot sign independently;
  4. Subjects who refuse to participate in the study and disapprove the use of their medical data for research;
  5. Patients who are predicted to be unavailable for long-term postoperative follow-up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Completion rate of qualified intraoperative surgical imaging data

    Time frame: Immediately after each surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Completeness rate of long-term postoperative clinical follow-up

    Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after surgery

  2. Reusability rate of annotated key anatomical structures in videos

    Time frame: From completion of data warehousing and annotation, the reusability rate will be analyzed within 3 months, assessed up to 3 months after annotation completion.

  3. Feasibility rate (%) of surgical video dataset applied in different clinical AI research scenarios

    Three core application scenarios are predefined: 1) training of surgical computer vision AI models; 2) validation of intraoperative surgical recognition algorithms; 3) surgical skill assessment and teaching research. An expert review panel consisting of at least 3 attending surgeons and 2 medical AI researchers independently evaluates whether the dataset has sufficient sample size, annotation completeness and video quality to support each scenario. Feasibility proportion is calculated as: (Number of scenarios the dataset is suitable for / Total predefined scenarios) × 100%.

    Time frame: After full construction of the surgical video dataset, scenario feasibility assessment will be finished within 6 months, assessed up to 6 months after dataset construction.

  4. Accuracy percentage (%) of AI-based surgical procedure identification on annotated surgical videos

    After all surgical videos are imported into the data warehouse and manually annotated by experienced surgeons to generate gold-standard procedure labels, the surgical video analysis AI model automatically outputs predicted surgical procedure categories for each video clip. Each AI-predicted label is compared against the manual gold-standard annotation label. Identification accuracy is calculated by the formula: (Number of video clips with correctly predicted surgical procedures / Total number of tested video clips) × 100%.

    Time frame: After completion of data warehousing and annotation, AI surgical procedure identification accuracy testing will be conducted within 3 months, assessed up to 3 months post annotation completion.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Beijing, China
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07752862
Lead sponsor
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Collaborators
Beihang University, Beijing Digital Precision Medicine Technology Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Zeyu Zhang, PHD (Professor, Chinese Academy of Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

KUNSHAN HE
Contact
hekunshan@buaa.edu.cn
+86 18500535530

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion