ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07738458Updated Jul 31, 2026

Robot-Assisted Closed Reduction and Internal Fixation for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures

An interventional study of Robot-assisted closed reduction and internal fixation and Conventional manual closed reduction and internal fixation in Intertrochanteric Fractures, Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip and Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur, sponsored by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-31.

Sponsored by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted autonomous closed reduction versus traditional manual closed reduction in adult patients aged 18 to 80 years with acute, closed intertrochanteric femoral fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] classification 31-A). The main question it aims to answer is:

Whether robot-assisted autonomous closed reduction can achieve a significantly higher rate of excellent and good bone fracture reduction compared to traditional manual reduction, as rigorously evaluated by low-dose computed tomography (CT) and a three-dimensional (3D) quantitative standard.

Researchers will compare the robot-assisted autonomous closed reduction group (intervention group) to the traditional manual closed reduction group (control group) to see if the robotic system significantly improves 3D anatomical reduction precision, reduces intraoperative fluoroscopy times and radiation doses, shortens operation times, and ultimately enhances long-term clinical hip functions and health-related quality of life.

Participants will be asked to do the following tasks:

Complete baseline medical screening, standard hip X-rays, and bilateral full-length thin-layer CT scans before the surgery.

Undergo a 1:1 randomized allocation after anesthesia to receive either robot-assisted autonomous closed reduction or traditional experience-based manual closed reduction, both followed by conventional proximal femoral intramedullary nailing internal fixation.

Receive post-operative low-dose CT scans before discharge or within 2 weeks after surgery to evaluate the fracture reduction quality.

Follow a standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) rehabilitation pathway and attend scheduled follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery to monitor bone healing, hip functions, and quality of life

02

Conditions studied

  • Intertrochanteric Fractures
  • Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip
  • Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hip Fractures

842 studies on the registry are indexed under Hip Fractures; 165 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 86 across 533 interventional studies indexed under Hip Fractures.

Browse Hip Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 80 years, inclusive.
  • Male or female participants.
  • Acute, closed intertrochanteric femoral fracture.
  • AO/OTA classification 31-A intertrochanteric femoral fracture.
  • Fracture requiring closed reduction and proximal femoral intramedullary nailing.
  • Injury-to-surgery interval no more than 14 days.
  • Participant or legally authorized representative is fully informed about the study.
  • Written voluntarily provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fracture.
  • Pathological fracture.
  • Old fracture with an injury-to-surgery interval greater than 14 days.
  • Multiple fractures.
  • Previous surgery involving the affected hip joint.
  • Deformity of the affected hip joint.
  • Severe osteoarthritis of the affected hip joint.
  • Significant neuromuscular disease affecting lower limb function.
  • Significant neuromuscular disease affecting postoperative rehabilitation.
  • Severe systemic comorbidity that makes the participant unable to tolerate anesthesia or surgery.
  • Severe organ dysfunction that makes the participant unable to tolerate anesthesia or surgery.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Lactation.
  • Cognitive impairment that prevents compliance with postoperative follow-up or rehabilitation protocols.
  • Active psychiatric illness that prevents compliance with postoperative follow-up or rehabilitation protocols.
  • Other condition that prevents compliance with postoperative follow-up or rehabilitation protocols.
  • Current participation in another clinical trial that may interfere with evaluation of this study's outcomes.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robot-Assisted Closed Reduction

    Participants will undergo robot-assisted closed reduction followed by conventional proximal femoral intramedullary nailing internal fixation, using the Robot-Assisted Fracture Reduction (RAFR) system. The robotic system will identify bone fragment displacement parameters based on pre-operative 3D CT images, plan the optimal reduction pathway, and execute or assist the surgeon in performing the closed reduction under real-time navigation and safety control. After reduction, a standard proximal femoral intramedullary nail will be implanted using routine minimally invasive surgical techniques to achieve stable internal fixation.

    Procedure: Robot-assisted closed reduction and internal fixation

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Manual Closed Reduction

    Patients assigned to this arm will undergo traditional manual closed reduction of the intertrochanteric femoral fracture . The reduction will be executed by the surgeon using conventional traction and manual manipulation under standard fluoroscopic guidance. Following manual closed reduction, conventional proximal femoral intramedullary nailing internal fixation will be performed by the surgeon.

    Procedure: Conventional manual closed reduction and internal fixation

Interventions

  • ProcedureRobot-assisted closed reduction and internal fixation

    The key distinguishing feature of this intervention is the transition from empirical, experience-based traction to computer-planned, quantitatively-controlled reduction. The robotic system creates an individualized 3D model based on pre-operative thin-layer CT and automatically calculates precise fragment displacement parameters. Unlike manual methods, the reduction pathway is executed or guided via real-time spatial navigation and digital monitoring with strict safety interlocking mechanisms. This approach aims to reduce human judgment bias and enhance 3D anatomical alignment precision, particularly in correcting complex translation and rotational deformities.

  • ProcedureConventional manual closed reduction and internal fixation

    This intervention relies entirely on the surgical team's clinical experience, using a standard orthopedic traction table or manual manipulation to achieve bone alignment. Unlike the experimental group, no intelligent robotic systems, 2D-3D registration software, or spatial tracking devices are permitted during any stage of the operation. Reduction quality is evaluated intraoperatively using routine two-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy (AP and lateral views) rather than computerized 3D planning. If closed alignment is inadequate, the surgeon may convert to a limited open reduction using joysticks or clamps based on empirical judgment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Excellent or Good Closed Fracture Reduction Assessed by Postoperative Low-Dose CT-Based 3D Quantitative Reduction Grading Criteria

    Closed fracture reduction will be assessed on postoperative low-dose CT using a 3D quantitative grading system. Four dimensions will be graded as Excellent, Good, Fair, or Poor: displacement/shortening, angular deformity, rotational deformity, and medial/anterior cortical support. The thresholds are ≤3 mm/° for Excellent, \>3-5 mm/° for Good, \>5-10 mm/° for Fair, and \>10 mm/° for Poor, while cortical support is graded as positive, neutral, mild negative, or significant negative/step-off. The final grade will be the lowest grade across all dimensions, and the excellent/good rate is the percentage of participants with a final grade of Excellent or Good.

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to postoperative low-dose CT assessment, assessed up to 2 weeks after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Operation Time Measured in Minutes

    Total operation time will be measured in minutes and defined as the duration from the initial skin incision to completion of skin closure.

    Time frame: From initial skin incision to completion of skin closure, assessed up to 8 hours

  2. Intraoperative Blood Loss Measured in Milliliters

    The estimated total volume of blood loss during the surgical procedure will be recorded in milliliters (mL).

    Time frame: From initial skin incision to completion of skin closure, assessed up to 8 hours

  3. Change from Baseline in Hip Function Assessed by Harris Hip Score (HHS)

    Hip function will be evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The score ranges from 0 to 100 points, evaluating domains including pain, daily functions (gait, activities of daily living), absence of deformity, and joint range of motion. A higher score indicates better hip function and lower pain severity.

    Time frame: From baseline to 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  4. Change from Baseline in Quality of Life Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). It measures five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Descriptive scores are converted into a standard index value, where higher values mean better health status.

    Time frame: From baseline to 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  5. Time to Radiographic Bone Healing Assessed by Standard Two-View X-Ray

    Time to radiographic bone healing will be measured in weeks. Radiographic bone healing will be defined as cortical bridging in at least 3 of 4 cortices on standard anteroposterior and lateral X-rays, with no significant pain during weight-bearing. Low-dose CT may be used to confirm bone healing in uncertain cases.

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to the first documented radiographic evidence of fracture union, assessed up to 6 months after surgery

  6. Number of Intraoperative C-Arm Fluoroscopy Shots

    The number of intraoperative fluoroscopy shots taken using the C-arm during the surgical procedure will be recorded.

    Time frame: From initial skin incision to completion of skin closure, assessed up to 8 hours

  7. Robot-Assisted Reduction Planning and Execution Time Measured in Minutes in the Experimental Group

    For participants assigned to the experimental group, the robot-assisted reduction planning and execution time will be recorded in minutes. This time is defined as the duration from completion of robotic arm setup to completion of the reduction maneuver.

    Time frame: From initial skin incision to completion of the reduction maneuver, assessed up to 8 hours

  8. Incidence of Intraoperative Complications

    The percentage of participants experiencing intraoperative complications, including neurovascular injury, device failure, or conversion to manual reduction, will be recorded.

    Time frame: From initial skin incision to completion of skin closure, assessed up to 8 hours

  9. Incidence of Postoperative Complications

    The percentage of participants experiencing postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, implant loosening or breakage, screw cut-out, or femoral head collapse, will be recorded.

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to the occurrence of postoperative complications, assessed up to 6 months after surgery

  10. Length of Hospital Stay Measured in Days

    The length of hospital stay will be recorded in days from admission to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days

  11. Radiographic Fracture Union Rate Assessed by Standard X-Ray

    The percentage of participants achieving radiographic fracture union will be assessed using standard anteroposterior and lateral X-rays. Low-dose CT may be used to confirm fracture union in uncertain cases.

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to the first documented radiographic evidence of fracture union, assessed up to 6 months after surgery

  12. Incidence of Reoperation

    The percentage of participants requiring reoperation after the index surgery will be recorded.

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to reoperation assessment, assessed up to 6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1458-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 20. PubMed 29699731 ↗
  • Graulich T, Omar M, Sehmisch S, Liodakis E. Controversies in the Treatment Strategies of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Scoping Review and Discussion of a Literature-Based Algorithm. J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 24;14(7):2200. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072200. PubMed 40217650 ↗
  • Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012. PubMed 7608228 ↗
  • Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, Li Q, Dargel J, Eysel P. Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):811-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2206-x. Epub 2015 Apr 4. PubMed 25840887 ↗
  • Liu P, Jin D, Zhang C, Gao Y. Revision surgery due to failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: current state-of-the-art. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 22;21(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03593-8. PubMed 32828132 ↗
  • Zhao JX, Li C, Ren H, Hao M, Zhang LC, Tang PF. Evolution and Current Applications of Robot-Assisted Fracture Reduction: A Comprehensive Review. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Jan;48(1):203-224. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02332-y. Epub 2019 Jul 29. PubMed 31359265 ↗
  • Kou W, Zhou P, Lin J, Kuang S, Sun L. Technologies evolution in robot-assisted fracture reduction systems: a comprehensive review. Front Robot AI. 2023 Nov 22;10:1315250. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1315250. eCollection 2023. PubMed 38077454 ↗
  • Bai L, Yang J, Chen X, Sun Y, Li X. Medical Robotics in Bone Fracture Reduction Surgery: A Review. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Aug 18;19(16):3593. doi: 10.3390/s19163593. PubMed 31426577 ↗
  • Zhao C, Wang Y, Wu X, Zhu G, Shi S. Design and evaluation of an intelligent reduction robot system for the minimally invasive reduction in pelvic fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 4;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03089-2. PubMed 35379278 ↗
  • Cho YC, Lee PY, Lee CH, Chen CH, Lin YM. Three-dimensional CT Improves the Reproducibility of Stability Evaluation for Intertrochanteric Fractures. Orthop Surg. 2018 Aug;10(3):212-217. doi: 10.1111/os.12396. PubMed 30152606 ↗
  • Zhao C, Zhu G, Wang Y, Wu X. TiRobot-assisted versus conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 5;17(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03420-x. PubMed 36471345 ↗
  • Zhao C, Cao Q, Sun X, Wu X, Zhu G, Wang Y. Intelligent robot-assisted minimally invasive reduction system for reduction of unstable pelvic fractures. Injury. 2023 Feb;54(2):604-614. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 4. PubMed 36371315 ↗
  • Zhao C, Xiao H, Cao Q, Ge Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Zhu G, Wu X. Innovative development of robot reduction system in geriatric pelvic fractures: A single-center case series in Beijing, China. J Orthop Translat. 2024 Oct 30;49:283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.023. eCollection 2024 Nov. PubMed 39534853 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 29 months after the start.

Of 221 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hip Fractures, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 29 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 237 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 29, 2026
First posted
Jul 31, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 29, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 29, 2028
Last update
Jul 31, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07738458
Lead sponsor
Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
Collaborators
Beihang University, Aerospace Center Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 31, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 29, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 29, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 31, 2026

Study contacts

Chunpeng Zhao
Contact
zcpllza2008@163.com
+86 18610012704

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion