CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07735949Updated Sep 30, 2026

Effects of Daily Footwear Use on Lower Extremity Health and Movement in Healthy Adults

An observational study in Healthy Volunteers and Foot Biomechanics, sponsored by Bahçeşehir University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Bahçeşehir University · Observational

Updated Sep 30, 2026Now CompletedEnrollment updatedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Footwear is one of the most important external factors influencing lower extremity biomechanics, plantar sensory feedback, and postural control. Although supportive footwear provides cushioning and arch support, prolonged use may reduce intrinsic foot muscle activity and alter natural foot mechanics. Conversely, flat footwear may enhance plantar sensory input and foot muscle activation. However, evidence regarding the long-term biomechanical effects of habitual footwear use in healthy adults remains inconsistent.

This cross-sectional comparative study aims to compare foot posture, plantar pressure distribution, and balance performance between healthy adults who have regularly worn supportive footwear or flat footwear for at least six months. Static plantar pressure distribution will be assessed using the Footwork system, while static and dynamic balance will be evaluated using the Biodex Balance System. The findings are expected to improve understanding of the long-term biomechanical consequences of habitual footwear selection.

Read the detailed description

Footwear is one of the most influential external factors affecting lower extremity biomechanics, plantar sensory feedback, and postural control during daily activities. Modern footwear designs differ considerably in their structural characteristics, including cushioning, arch support, sole stiffness, and heel height. These features may alter foot mechanics, proprioceptive input, and neuromuscular control, potentially leading to long-term adaptations in balance and movement patterns. Supportive footwear is designed to improve comfort and reduce plantar loading through enhanced cushioning and medial arch support. However, prolonged use has been suggested to limit the natural motion of the foot and reduce activation of the intrinsic foot muscles. In contrast, flat footwear provides minimal structural support, allowing greater interaction between the plantar surface and the ground, which may enhance sensory feedback and promote more natural foot function.

Despite increasing interest in footwear biomechanics, evidence regarding the long-term effects of habitual footwear use in healthy individuals remains limited and inconsistent. Most previous studies have focused on the immediate effects of different shoe designs during walking or running, whereas few have investigated the chronic adaptations associated with everyday footwear habits. Furthermore, objective assessments combining plantar pressure analysis and computerized balance evaluation have rarely been used to compare individuals with different long-term footwear preferences.

The aim of this cross-sectional comparative study is to investigate whether habitual use of supportive or flat footwear is associated with differences in foot posture, plantar pressure distribution, and postural stability in healthy adults. Participants aged 18 to 35 years who have consistently worn either supportive or flat footwear for at least six months, for a minimum of six hours per day, will be recruited from the Faculty of Health Sciences at Bahçeşehir University.

Following informed consent, demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and footwear history will be recorded. Static plantar pressure distribution and foot posture characteristics will be assessed using the Footwork Pedobarography System. Static and dynamic balance performance will be evaluated using the Biodex Balance System. Balance measurements will include double-leg and single-leg standing assessments, and objective stability indices will be recorded according to standardized testing protocols.

The primary outcomes will be the Overall Stability Index obtained from the Biodex Balance System and plantar pressure distribution parameters measured using the Footwork Pedobarography System. Secondary outcomes will include anterior-posterior and medial-lateral stability indices, foot contact area, arch-related plantar pressure characteristics, and balance performance during single-leg and double-leg stance.

It is hypothesized that individuals who habitually wear flat footwear will demonstrate different plantar pressure characteristics and balance performance compared with those who regularly wear supportive footwear, reflecting long-term biomechanical adaptations associated with footwear selection.

The findings of this study are expected to improve understanding of the relationship between habitual footwear use and lower extremity biomechanics in healthy adults. The results may contribute to evidence-based recommendations regarding footwear selection and support preventive strategies in physiotherapy, rehabilitation, sports medicine, and footwear design. Additionally, this study may provide a scientific basis for future longitudinal and interventional research investigating the long-term musculoskeletal consequences of everyday footwear habits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Volunteers
  • Foot Biomechanics

Keywords

  • Footwear
  • Balance
  • Plantar Pressure
  • Healthy Adults
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Bahçeşehir University is the lead sponsor of 117 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy adults aged 18-35 years will be recruited from the Faculty of Health Sciences at Bahçeşehir University. Participants must have habitually worn either supportive footwear or flat footwear for at least 6 months, with an average daily use of at least 6 hours. Eligible individuals will be assigned to groups according to their habitual footwear type and will undergo assessments of plantar pressure distribution, foot posture, and balance performance.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years and older
  • Diagnosis of hemophilia A or B
  • Scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Able to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent
  • Willing to participate in the prehabilitation program

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of neurological disorders affecting balance or gait
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Other musculoskeletal conditions affecting lower extremity function
  • Revision total knee arthroplasty
  • Any medical condition that would prevent safe participation in the exercise program
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Supportive Footwear Group

    Healthy adults who have habitually worn supportive footwear for at least 6 months, with an average daily use of at least 6 hours.

  • Flat Footwear Group

    Healthy adults who have habitually worn flat footwear for at least 6 months, with an average daily use of at least 6 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Stability Index (OSI)

    Overall Stability Index measured using the Biodex Balance System.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Plantar Pressure Distribution

    Static plantar pressure distribution assessed using the Footwork Pedobarography System.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Foot Contact Area

    Foot contact area will be assessed using the Footwork Pro pressure plate system (Footwork®, AM CUBE, France). Participants will stand barefoot on the pressure platform during the assessment. The system will record the plantar contact area (cm²) of each foot using computerized baropodometric analysis. Higher values indicate a larger plantar contact area during static standing.

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Arch Index

    The Arch Index is a footprint-based measure used to classify foot arch height. It is calculated as the ratio of the midfoot contact area to the total footprint area (excluding the toes). Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating a flatter foot (lower medial longitudinal arch) and lower values indicating a higher medial longitudinal arch.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Anterior-Posterior Stability Index

    Anterior-Posterior Stability Index is a measure of postural stability in the sagittal plane, assessed using the Biodex Balance System. Scores typically range from 0 upward, with lower scores indicating better postural stability (less sway) and higher scores indicating poorer postural stability (greater sway).

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Single-leg Balance

    Static balance is assessed by measuring the time participants can maintain a one-legged stance. Scores range from 0 to 30 seconds, with higher scores indicating better static balance.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bahcesehir university
    Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sherafat S, Salavati M, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Akhbari B, Mohammadirad S, Mazaheri M, Negahban H. Intrasession and intersession reliability of postural control in participants with and without nonspecific low back pain using the Biodex Balance System. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Feb;36(2):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.12.005. PubMed 23499146 ↗
  • Ridge ST, Olsen MT, Bruening DA, Jurgensmeier K, Griffin D, Davis IS, Johnson AW. Walking in Minimalist Shoes Is Effective for Strengthening Foot Muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jan;51(1):104-113. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001751. PubMed 30113521 ↗
  • Franklin S, Grey MJ, Heneghan N, Bowen L, Li FX. Barefoot vs common footwear: A systematic review of the kinematic, kinetic and muscle activity differences during walking. Gait Posture. 2015 Sep;42(3):230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 Jun 3. PubMed 26220400 ↗
  • Cudejko T, Gardiner J, Akpan A, D'Aout K. Minimal footwear improves stability and physical function in middle-aged and older people compared to conventional shoes. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Jan;71:139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 11. PubMed 31739197 ↗
  • Chen TL, Sze LK, Davis IS, Cheung RT. Effects of training in minimalist shoes on the intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscle volume. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Jul;36:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 10. PubMed 27195735 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Sep 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 30, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    + 4 other changes: verification date, date precision, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07735949
Lead sponsor
Bahçeşehir University
Responsible party
Tuğçe Poyraz İşleyen (Asst.Prof, Bahçeşehir University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2026
Start date
Jul 15, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2026
Completion
Aug 20, 2026
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion