An observational study in Healthy Volunteers and Foot Biomechanics, sponsored by Bahçeşehir University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.
Sponsored by Bahçeşehir University · Observational
Footwear is one of the most important external factors influencing lower extremity biomechanics, plantar sensory feedback, and postural control. Although supportive footwear provides cushioning and arch support, prolonged use may reduce intrinsic foot muscle activity and alter natural foot mechanics. Conversely, flat footwear may enhance plantar sensory input and foot muscle activation. However, evidence regarding the long-term biomechanical effects of habitual footwear use in healthy adults remains inconsistent.
This cross-sectional comparative study aims to compare foot posture, plantar pressure distribution, and balance performance between healthy adults who have regularly worn supportive footwear or flat footwear for at least six months. Static plantar pressure distribution will be assessed using the Footwork system, while static and dynamic balance will be evaluated using the Biodex Balance System. The findings are expected to improve understanding of the long-term biomechanical consequences of habitual footwear selection.
Footwear is one of the most influential external factors affecting lower extremity biomechanics, plantar sensory feedback, and postural control during daily activities. Modern footwear designs differ considerably in their structural characteristics, including cushioning, arch support, sole stiffness, and heel height. These features may alter foot mechanics, proprioceptive input, and neuromuscular control, potentially leading to long-term adaptations in balance and movement patterns. Supportive footwear is designed to improve comfort and reduce plantar loading through enhanced cushioning and medial arch support. However, prolonged use has been suggested to limit the natural motion of the foot and reduce activation of the intrinsic foot muscles. In contrast, flat footwear provides minimal structural support, allowing greater interaction between the plantar surface and the ground, which may enhance sensory feedback and promote more natural foot function.
Despite increasing interest in footwear biomechanics, evidence regarding the long-term effects of habitual footwear use in healthy individuals remains limited and inconsistent. Most previous studies have focused on the immediate effects of different shoe designs during walking or running, whereas few have investigated the chronic adaptations associated with everyday footwear habits. Furthermore, objective assessments combining plantar pressure analysis and computerized balance evaluation have rarely been used to compare individuals with different long-term footwear preferences.
The aim of this cross-sectional comparative study is to investigate whether habitual use of supportive or flat footwear is associated with differences in foot posture, plantar pressure distribution, and postural stability in healthy adults. Participants aged 18 to 35 years who have consistently worn either supportive or flat footwear for at least six months, for a minimum of six hours per day, will be recruited from the Faculty of Health Sciences at Bahçeşehir University.
Following informed consent, demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and footwear history will be recorded. Static plantar pressure distribution and foot posture characteristics will be assessed using the Footwork Pedobarography System. Static and dynamic balance performance will be evaluated using the Biodex Balance System. Balance measurements will include double-leg and single-leg standing assessments, and objective stability indices will be recorded according to standardized testing protocols.
The primary outcomes will be the Overall Stability Index obtained from the Biodex Balance System and plantar pressure distribution parameters measured using the Footwork Pedobarography System. Secondary outcomes will include anterior-posterior and medial-lateral stability indices, foot contact area, arch-related plantar pressure characteristics, and balance performance during single-leg and double-leg stance.
It is hypothesized that individuals who habitually wear flat footwear will demonstrate different plantar pressure characteristics and balance performance compared with those who regularly wear supportive footwear, reflecting long-term biomechanical adaptations associated with footwear selection.
The findings of this study are expected to improve understanding of the relationship between habitual footwear use and lower extremity biomechanics in healthy adults. The results may contribute to evidence-based recommendations regarding footwear selection and support preventive strategies in physiotherapy, rehabilitation, sports medicine, and footwear design. Additionally, this study may provide a scientific basis for future longitudinal and interventional research investigating the long-term musculoskeletal consequences of everyday footwear habits.
Bahçeşehir University is the lead sponsor of 117 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Healthy adults aged 18-35 years will be recruited from the Faculty of Health Sciences at Bahçeşehir University. Participants must have habitually worn either supportive footwear or flat footwear for at least 6 months, with an average daily use of at least 6 hours. Eligible individuals will be assigned to groups according to their habitual footwear type and will undergo assessments of plantar pressure distribution, foot posture, and balance performance.
Exclusion Criteria:
Healthy adults who have habitually worn supportive footwear for at least 6 months, with an average daily use of at least 6 hours.
Healthy adults who have habitually worn flat footwear for at least 6 months, with an average daily use of at least 6 hours.
Overall Stability Index (OSI)
Overall Stability Index measured using the Biodex Balance System.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar Pressure Distribution
Static plantar pressure distribution assessed using the Footwork Pedobarography System.
Time frame: Baseline
Foot Contact Area
Foot contact area will be assessed using the Footwork Pro pressure plate system (Footwork®, AM CUBE, France). Participants will stand barefoot on the pressure platform during the assessment. The system will record the plantar contact area (cm²) of each foot using computerized baropodometric analysis. Higher values indicate a larger plantar contact area during static standing.
Time frame: baseline
Arch Index
The Arch Index is a footprint-based measure used to classify foot arch height. It is calculated as the ratio of the midfoot contact area to the total footprint area (excluding the toes). Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating a flatter foot (lower medial longitudinal arch) and lower values indicating a higher medial longitudinal arch.
Time frame: Baseline
Anterior-Posterior Stability Index
Anterior-Posterior Stability Index is a measure of postural stability in the sagittal plane, assessed using the Biodex Balance System. Scores typically range from 0 upward, with lower scores indicating better postural stability (less sway) and higher scores indicating poorer postural stability (greater sway).
Time frame: Baseline
Single-leg Balance
Static balance is assessed by measuring the time participants can maintain a one-legged stance. Scores range from 0 to 30 seconds, with higher scores indicating better static balance.
Time frame: Baseline
Plan to share: No
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Bahçeşehir University