ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07732842ECRAUpdated Sep 10, 2026

Study of Repetitive Behaviors in Alzheimer's Disease

An observational study in Alzheimer Disease, Anterograde Amnesia and Anosognosia, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Esquirol. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Esquirol · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2021; still recruiting 5 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
103
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by anterograde amnesia, the inability to memorize and remember events occurring after the cerebral lesion. Among the most frequently reported psychobehavioral symptoms are repetitive behaviors (RBs), defined as actions or statements repeated in an inappropriate and non-functional way.

The most commonly used tool to assess repetitive behaviors is the Stereotypy Rating Inventory (SRI). It is a questionnaire that evaluates five types of stereotypical behavior: eating, wandering, speech, movements, and daily routines. The frequency and severity of the behaviors are reported, and a total score can be calculated.

There is no consensus on the types of repetitive behaviors observed specifically in AD, their frequency, or their cognitive correlates, nor is there a hypothesis explaining why these symptoms do not occur in all AD patients. Furthermore, certain parameters, such as anosognosia (lack of awareness of the disorders), have not been linked to RBs in the literature. We propose to evaluate patients with anterograde amnesia in terms of cognition and behavior-specifically, the presence or absence of both RBs and anosognosia-to examine possible links between cognitive performance, anosognosia, and RB.

Moreover, there is no theoretical framework explaining the emergence of RBs in amnesia. We suggest that RBs are linked to a lack of memory updating in the cognitive system. Since episodic memory no longer provides mnemonic feedback, previously encountered stimuli may trigger repeated behavior.

To test this hypothesis, we decided to conduct a multicenter, cross-sectional, case-control study. Patients with AD, with or without RBs, as well as healthy subjects, were repeatedly presented with sentence starters to complete freely, with the aim of studying the similarity of responses across sessions for each participant. We also included a patient with pure anterograde amnesia from a previously submitted case study protocol, who exhibited pronounced RBs symptomatology following neurosurgery (non-AD patient), to examine the phenomenon in a non-Alzheimer's context.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Anterograde Amnesia
  • Anosognosia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Repetitive behavior
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 103 is below the median of 200 across 814 observational studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Esquirol is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of:

  • 42 patients RB+ and 30 patients RB- patients recruited at the CMRR in Limoges and Nantes during their follow-up appointments for Alzheimer's disease.
  • 30 healthy subjects who are caregivers for patients monitored at the CMRR in Limoges.
  • And the patient with AA anterograde amnesia, who was recruited as part of his follow-up at the CMRR in Limoges for his severe anterograde amnesia caused by brain damage to the fornix pillars following complications from neurosurgery.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

I- RB+ (n=42) and RB- (n=30) groups :

  1. > 20
  2. 1 reliable family caregiver identified per patient
  3. Patients under legal protection (guardianship/curatorship) or not
  4. Selection:

4.a. AD patients with an SRI score > 0 will constitute the RB+ subgroup. 4.b. Only the first 30 patients included will undergo V2, V3, and V4. The first 30 AD patients included with an SRI score = 0 will constitute the RB- subgroup.

II- Control group: healthy subjects (n=30)

  1. Healthy subjects
  2. MMSE ≥ 26/30
  3. Men and women matched to AD patients in terms of age and sociocultural level.
  4. Healthy subjects will be included by the CMRR in Limoges

III- Control group: Patient with anterograde amnesia (AA) (n=1):

  1. The patient with anterograde amnesia is a patient who participated in the ANISAAFORNIX study (another study submitted by the investigator) and is included in this study due to rich RB symptomatology. He is a 54-year-old man with lesions of the fornix following complications from neurosurgery, which led to severe anterograde amnesia. This patient does not have AD.
  2. This patient is under legal protection (guardianship).
  3. Patient monitored and included at the CMRR in Limoges.

Exclusion Criteria: I- RB+ and RB- groups and healthy subjects:

  1. Isolated participants (without an identified caregiver) (RB+ and RB- groups)
  2. Participants must not have a history of alcohol or other substance dependence in the past 12 months.
  3. Participants must not have any other neurological condition (with the exception of patients with AA anterograde amnesia). Any history of moderate to severe head trauma, stroke, or developmental disorders is a criterion for exclusion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
103 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with repetitive behavior (RB+)
  • Patients without repetitive behavior (RB-)
  • Control group
  • Patient with anterograde amnesia (AA)

    Patient with anterograde amnesia , resulting from complications following neurosurgery (non-Alzheimer Disease patient).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Characterize the type of repetitive behaviour (RB) observed in AD and estimate its frequency in this disease

    The repetitive behavior score is obtained using the Stereotypy Inventory Rating (SRI) scale after the participant has been included in the study. The five types of stereotypical behavioral disturbances: eating behaviors, wandering, speech, movements, and daily rhythms are collected. A score of zero means no repetitive behavior, and a score strictly above 0 means the presence of repetitive behavior.

    Time frame: At enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Investigate cognitive characteristics in Alzheimer's disease patients that explain the presence or absence of repetitive behaviour (RB).

    Cognitive characteristics are based on scores obtained in the RL/RI16 cognitive tests, which assess learning abilities in verbal episodic memory, particularly the processes of encoding, storage, and retrieval. We believe that we will observe a difference of 2 points out of 16 on the "Recognition" subtest of the RL/RI-16 test between SRI-positive subjects and SRI-negative subjects.

    Time frame: At enrollment

  2. Investigate the possible link between repetitive behavior and anosognosia.

    Investigate the possible link between repetitive behavior and anosognosia is based on a possible correlation between the scores obtained on the SRI, CDS, and MPR. The CDS allows anosognosia to be assessed independently of the cognitive task. It contains a patient questionnaire and an helper questionnaire, which are compared, and a discrepancy between the two reflects anosognosia. The Memory Performance Ratio (MPR) allows anosognosia to be assessed in a manner consistent with the cognitive task. Using a 5-point Likert scale, participants are asked to rate the quality of their performance. The pre- and post-dictions will be compared to the patient's actual performance, allowing a ratio to be established: the more accurate the participant is in their representation of their own performance, the lower the ratio will be. The further the participant's assessment is from their actual performance, the higher the ratio will be, indicating anosognosia.

    Time frame: At enrollment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07732842
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Esquirol
Responsible party
Clément Polin (Principal Investigator, Centre Hospitalier Esquirol) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Jun 24, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 24, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 24, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Clément POLIN, PhD neuropsychology
Contact
clement.polin@ch-esquirol-limoges.fr
555431215 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion